| Utrommaniac |
03-09-2019 07:50 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roseangelo
(Post 1797458)
I'm pretty sure all this is saying is that they would like to see IDW go from being a publicly traded company to being a privately owned company. This kind of thing happens pretty regularly in business and doesn't really indicate anything bad in general. The only thing is that once a sale is made, the new owners usually like to change or rearrange the furniture, so to say. The company I used to work for was bought out in Sept. 2017. After a few changes and rearranges, I was shown the door in a round of layoffs March 2018. So that sucked. But the company is still around and is more or less the same as it was before the sale.
|
And would any new investor really want to mess around with the top sellers? Especially with one of the properties that is doing pretty well, all things considered? And with anything the "Big Boys" are giving IDW licence to publish like Marvel/Disney and DC?
But there is something I think is getting lost in translation.
Just because a hedge fund investor with 9% of stock is "calling" for a sale, doesn't mean a sale is going to happen.
What do the other stockholders think? What does IDW management itself think? This seems more like an "this guy made a suggestion to the company" than the company itself making the decision. All that the article is showing is a review of events and sharing the open letter. As far as my reading comprehension can tell, nothing seems to be happening really, except for the change of hands that's presently going through at the top. Which they're probably too busy getting settled with to even bother with any decision making about selling.
Hell, Bobby doesn't even seem that worried
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Curnow
(Post 1797429)
Ok, just read that article. Some things to keep in mind, if i'm reading it correctly:
-This is one guy who represents a 10% controlling interest in the company. A long way to go from anything resembling a majority.
-He's talking about IDW Entertainment partnering with (or yes, being bought by) a larger entertainment company to better leverage IDW's existing IP into more money.
So, in short, this is one guy amongst many, he's not speaking for everyone, or even the majority, on the board of investors. And what he's describing doesn't have anything to do with the publishing branch, especially the side of it dealing with licenses. The profits from our licensed books enable us to take chances on more unknown/risky original IP books, and this guy's goal is to have more original IP, so i'm not seeing any reason to suspect a book like TMNT would in any way be affected.
Now, companies get bought and sold all the time and new owners can have new ways of doing things. But from my understanding, there is zero reason to think any of that is happening. This is one guy stating publicly the direction he thinks the company should go in and that's it.
It should be stated that I got into comics to get away from big business type stuff, so my comprehension of the ins and outs of business is lacking. Maybe i'm missing something. But that's my take on it!
|
The sky's not falling for the TMNT publication. They probably get suggestions like this all the time; they just don't get shared online.
Basically: A guy from a hedge fund with no majority power is making suggestion too big for its britches, and won't even affect the way current publications are going to run anyway.
|