![]() |
Ace Ventura 3 with Sonic Writers for Amazon in development
https://collider.com/ace-venture-3-s...gehog-writers/
Quote:
|
We already have an Ace Ventura Trilogy with the prequel, this will be the fourth. I wonder if this will be better received than the sequel to dumb and dumber, which featured pretty much the same humor from the "classic" but wasn't loved. Also in the PC era many jokes will be too sanitized, they wanted to cancel the original movie not too long ago for being transphobic.
|
Quote:
|
The first Ace Ventura is one of the few straight-up comedy movies I sincerely enjoyed and still find funny. As well as one of the few Jim Carrey movies I can actually tolerate. "Man on the Moon" remains his best work, but Ace 1 is tolerable. I still think it holds up.
The second Ace Ventura made me want to puke. And no, nobody counts that stupid straight-to-video one. S'wrong wit'chu? :lol: I don't know. Can't see this going well, but We'll See. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....8L._SY445_.jpg |
- It is not a prequel, it's about his stupid kid with stupid "Character Played By Courtney Cox Who Is Now NOT Courtney Cox For Budget Reasons." Do your research.
- The Home Alone movies all come in a box set, too. That's called "marketing". If you ask any sane person if Home Alone 4 is actually in-canon with Home Alone 1 and 2, they'd shoot you in the face for asking such a ridiculous question. - Same with the Terminator movies. They come in a box set and NONE of those movies are even canon within their own universe. But they sell them in a package because it's just easier that way. - Superman Returns is sold in box sets with all four Chris Reeve Superman movies, even though Superman Returns is only canon with Superman 1 and Superman II (specifically, the Donner Cut of Superman II). - My point is that just because movies are sold in the same box for "completionists" does not mean they are "canon". - It is not canon because it is a Very Bad Movie. And that should be Good Enough. |
Also Robocop. Every attempt at a continuation tries to retcon 2 and 3, including the one they're trying to develop right now.
|
a bad movie doesn't mean its not canon unless retconned, remakes are a different beast. Superman Returns is only a loose sequel to the reeve's movies. Terminator's time travel timelines means pretty much anything is canon in that franchise in its own timeline.
#stillcanon #deadbeatdad #aceventura4 #thenewnew |
What continuations try to retcon 2 and 3? The TV show worked fine with 2 and 3, as did Prime Directives (though I don't think Prime Directives works with the TV show, or vice versa). And it's not clear what -- if anything -- Robocop Returns will try to retcon.
|
Quote:
|
Everything is in canon until a new chapter of a franchise comes out and retcons it, that's the basic rule.
|
Quote:
So its not like Sarah Connor Chronicles, which explicitly states that T3 is non-canon. |
Quote:
|
Dumb & Dumberer definitely stood until Dumb & Dumber To retconned it (one of their pairs of parents was made into an Asian family in the latter). Though it's fairly OK.
Son of the Mask is still canon until a Mask 3 tells us it's not. Same story with the Ace Ventura Kid Detective. Quote:
|
Sequel canon get especially hilarious when you add direct to video movies, you enter a rabbit hole. The DTV Addams Family Reunion tries to be in continuity being a sequel to the previous two live action movies w ith a few light references but it just doesn't fit well at all. The same company made the new addams family live action show just a year or two later and the dtv feels more in line with that continuity but even then it really doesn't.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Jaws 4 also invalidates some of the events of Jaws 3D, too. But they sell those movies together in box sets. Just sayin'. Jaws 4 overrides Jaws 3D in being a sequel to Jaws and Jaws 2. Even though 3D is the better movie and most people just prefer to pretend Jaws 4 never even happened.
I'm also not inclined to accept that "Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein" is canon with the other Universal films, just because they come in a case together. These things are more complicated than some people realize. |
Yeah. It's a combination of sequels invalidating previous sequels... but sometimes also creating pathways of "Choose Your Own Adventure."
Examples: Halloween (and what a horrible, horrible movie series rendered unnecessarily toxic by weird continuity) a) You can watch H1, H2, H4, H5, and H6. b) You can watch H1, H2, H20, and H8 c) You can watch H1 and H30 (and the upcoming two sequels as well) d) You can watch the H1 and H2 remakes. TMNT a) You can watch TMNT 1, TMNT 2, TMNT 3, and TMNT 2007. b) You can watch TMNT 1, TMNT 2, TMNT 3, and NT:TNM. c) You can watch TMNT 2014 and TMNT: OotS. And then burn them in a fire. Terminator a) You can watch T1, T2, T3, T4 b) You can watch T1, T2, T5 c) You can watch T1, T2, T6 d) (if you squint and apply fan theories) You can watch T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6... but you won't be happy and it won't be coherent. But it's time travel and intersecting loops so... Highlander a) You can watch H1 and H2 b) You can watch H1 and H3 c) You can watch H1 (as long as you pretend they're not the last Immortals and no Prize is won), H4, and the TV series, and H5 d) You can watch H1, H3 (as long as both in H1 and H3 you pretend they're not the last Immortals and no Prize is won), H4, the TV series, and H5. Texas Chainsaw Massacre I'm not even sure. I've only seen the TC1 and TC2 remakes from the 2000s. But I know there's been a slew of sequels that ignore a bunch of old sequels and pretend to be "the one true sequel" to the original movie, including the one coming up. Maybe somebody more versed in the Texas Chainsaw movies can chime in. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.