Trump not involved in 6th riot
 

So, now that the FBI (and BIDENS FBI, mind you) seems to have cleared him of all wrong doing (like most people figured out the day it happened)....what is the narrative going to be now? they can't really call it an insurrection anymore. because it wasn't.

I'm curious ifany news networks even covered this news. And why release this news now? is something else being developed that the FBI is afraid we are going to find out and blame them, and this is being used as a distraction?

Were there any links or article quotes you'd like to include or discuss...?


There's a reason he told people he'd be walking to the Capitol with them and then didn't, instead going and excitedly watching it on tv, as he'd never actually get his own hands dirty with it, because that would be instant accountability. A better plan is to rile people up so that they'll do the work for you so they take the blame, and many that got swept up into it ended up being upset that Trump did not pardon them like they believed he would. Trump has been doing this crap forever, getting people to do his dirty work so they take the fall for him instead.

There's also the small matter of top Republican officials desperately trying to contact Trump to tell him to call it off as it was happening.

Good point... Even if he's let off the hook because he stayed in the background, things like that are pretty damning against any suggestion that he's just entirely clueless and disconnected from the whole thing...

It never was an insurrection... if it was, folks would have been armed. GTFOH if you still can't see that. Thick headed numbskulls. MSM has been straight up lying about the events of that day, including about the exact words Trump made during his statement. BLM terrorists have done far more damage at their smallest riots than January 6th.

Not to mention, those protesters were let into the People's House.

Have you learned nothing from the TMNT. It might be fiction, but they're right about that part.

https://64.media.tumblr.com/29fe9d1e...t2ko1_400.gifv

If you're swinging something at someone's head and trying to cause injury, then you're armed in some shape or form. Guns did not magically become the ONLY form of weapons/arms or the only way of being armed. Maybe there were few people visibly flashing guns in the crowd, at least not noticeable in the chaos, but BS they weren't armed with other objects they were using as weapons to attack and hurt the police. Not to mention trying to steal their weapons to use against them, as proven in audio recording via a cop that was being attacked.

They were never LET in. Breaking windows and climbing through them is not being let in.

No source that I wouldn't trust to slant things like just done above.

maybe he didn't go because he was smart enough to know that THAT building was the LAST place on earth he should have been? Imagine if he had gone? then the headlines would have read 'SITTING PRESIDENT LEADS INSSURECTION!' even more so than they already have implied.

what about all those guard troops told to 'sit and wait' in some shopping center somewhere while the riot was going on? What happened to the report of some repubs AND democrats giving the rioters a tour of the building the day before? THAT vanished fast.

I've said it before, that this riot was a last ditch BI PARTISON PLOT to get trump convicted on SOMETHING so he couldn't run again. as they knew the two impeachments would not work by law and where just for show. at the very least, this was something they could use in news updates to make people angry or doubt. cause quite frankly, he was doing just fine until then.
and they STILL couldn't legally get him a third time. yet, one of their own in NY just got gone by resigning super fast. go figure.

where he screwed up, was taking it too personally, and not immediately denouncing things. but considering the 24/7 attacks by children, I think that can be forgiven a little.

We're still talking about Trump in mid/late 2021? Who cares what he does anymore or what people think of him? It's old news.

The leftist media definitely still is. Ratings haven't been the same since he left office. They need to keep him alive in news.

And yet, quite a few of them WERE armed, with guns. Among other weapons. They were even using DOORS as weapons to injure/kill people. Including cops. And exactly how is it lying about his exact words when those are literally a matter of record? Rioters may have done more monetary damage, but they weren't literally hunting down members of Congress to LYNCH them. With ropes and flagpoles for weapons.

Those people were basically hooligans and vandals.
Idiots? Yes. Dangerous "revolutionaries" who present a great threat? No.

Real revolutionaries would have a better plan than "get in and make selfies" and, of course, they would have been better prepared. You don't go against good security with stones and bottles..

You obviously aren't familiar with what passes for "Revolutionaries" in the states. Most are redneck idiots with more guns than brains, out in the middle of nowhere, bragging about how they intend to overthrow the Man.

these arn't revolutionaries. these are morons..the types we used to ignore but now get made famous on twitter ;o)

We have plenty of those idiots in Russia. Just like in US most of the time they drink on their kitchens.

Neither is a serious threat for any serious armed force.
If bunch of idiots with guns can overthrow government - its either a spectacle or...such government not worthy of being saved.

It's pretty funny.

Biden: "You'd need F15s and nuclear weapons to stand a chance at taking down the government!"

Also Biden: "Unarmed Trump supporters nearly took down our democracy on January 6th! We came THIS close!"

Not saying they COULD do it, but the sentiment and the "planning" is certainly there. Most are just too dumb to realize the futility of such an effort. But that doesn't stop them from planning it out. :trolleye:

Outside of Biden being "not entirely there", he has no reason to diminish "Trumps' threat". Afterall he was elected not because of of his positive qualities, but because he was marketed as "anyone, but Trump".

I don't really see how it incriminates Trump.

If, in theory, he was somehow connected to it - such riot would've achieved completely opposite. Anti-Trump media have a firm control over most of the country, not to mention mega corporations. If anything, it would have payed right at the DemocRATS hands, as it eventually did, more or less.

There was that, but there was also an understanding that he would be a very traditional, moderate democrat president. Not a radical leftist or anything. But sure enough, once he got into office everything he has been pushing is the radical left agenda... so I think a lot of even democrat voters feel a bit betrayed.

The people saying he is are the same people who went, "SEE?!?! He's a racist!" when that KKK guy "endorsed" him during the first election. Which is beyond stupid to say and anyone above a 2nd grade education who thinks about why that is for more than 2 seconds would know that.

The guy was put in as a patsy elect to fulfill the leftist agendas in Washington. Many people were saying that he wouldn't even make the term health wise, leaving Harris to come in.

The Dems don't care about running the country, they care about some social agenda, although I'd love to know the real reasons why. Fools and chicks on the forums here with gout and health problems will say that the reason why is that the Dems "care" about people. But that's complete nonsense.

Power, I guess.
Or at least I hope so. Elites saw an opportunity to ensure they will have a complete control over population via new technologies, like Internet and total espionage, so they just do that under the guise of "democracy" and "social justice". They basically trying to become new monarchy, with license to do whatever they want and their children being born into power.

Worst case scenario, they genuinely believe they MUST control people, because, they are smarter than everyone else.