Laid-off HBO Max execs confirm WB is ditching wokeness and embracing middle America
 

Well, let's hope so.

https://www.newspageindex.com/08/202...NDG4pylPkPeygc

If it means they will stop race changing characters for DC Movies going forward I'll take it.

Make America Middle Again!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d1/65...e545301a9f.jpg

Remember when every show was white, straight, and had 2.5 kids? No gay or lesbian characters, transgender was not spoken above the level of a whisper, and any black or spanish characters would be token characters or minorities in the shows. Muslims/Indians were not allowed on television, and the only Asians were in Kung Fu films.

Why can't it be 1955 again.

The DCEU movies were woke? I know damn near everything is considered woke now but I never get the impression any of them were particularly progressive. If anything I've heard people say they support them because they were the antithesis of the 'woke' MCU...to be fair I don't buy that they are anti-woke either.

Anyway I've never heard of the site linked and it seems kinda questionable. Like this is something that someone made up to appeal right wingers. Like I said how can they reject wokeness when they were never woke to begin with.

Only woke was considered woke. And there was a lot of woke $#!(, so I think you've created your own blanket statement bias thinking that you were outsmarting everyone you thought had created blanket statements about woke $#!(. That's called circumplexic thinking. The various DC I.P.'s have been littered with woke $#!( and it was getting into the DCEU movie plan as exemplified by Batgirl & weirdo-Supergirl in their planned movie iterations.

Like I've said in a variety of threads - it's a slow moving ship. I'm glad that WB is being proactive, but Disney has dug-in deep on it and will probably be the last institution to correct. Probably won't happen until Kathleen Kennedy has a stroke and Kevin Feige is replaced.

I do agree with this sentence though. Minus your oddly out-of-touch justification that WB hasn't been into woke $#!(, I'd say the same thing about that "news site".

I've heard enough interviews from right wing politicians, evangelical christians and regular conservatives that throw around the term woke constantly then incoherently bluster when asked what exactly they mean by when they call something woke to know that the word has lost all meaning. To the right it's buzz word designed to trigger idiots into being mad at something that makes them uncomfortable.

If we're talking about increased racial and ethnic diversity well the Latina Batgirl movie has been cancelled as a tax write off and I'm not sure if they are still going to use Latina Supergirl in Flashpoint but let's be generous and count them. There's the black Perry White and having Cyborg a founding member of the Justice League although that's mainly because the most recent comic reboot had him as a founder. So...that's it. Four debatably woke things in a decades worth of films. Hardly "littered with woke" as you put it.

WB is so woke that they hired the director of 300, the guy who remade Dawn of the Dead...a movie with an anti capitalist theme into a movie about how god punishes the world for accepting gays and sexually active women to oversee their most important movies. Now I doubt he was fired for his dodgy beliefs but rather his eye for action..still they didn't exactly stop him from inserting his politics into the movies.

So no I don't buy the DCEU was ever woke so by default can't reject it either.

It's true that the word "woke" has lost all meaning, just like the word "racist" has lost all meaning.

Because nuance has been erased.

Probably cause of the internet.

Go and rewatch Birds of Prey and WW84. And check out any synopsis of Batgirl anywhere and the "important" castings within it. Or WB's plans for not one but two black Superman projects. Big plans to replace -- like literally, their whole history and just swap in -- Henry Cavill Superman with Hispanic Supergirl in the Flash. General plans to replace Batman with an elderly Batman who's basically retired (Keaton), so that Batgirl, Supergirl and presumably one of the two black Supermen can be the face of the DCEU.

Also JJ Abrams wants a Black John Constantine from the rumors I have read.

Thank God that black Superman movie never became a thing. The world is not ready for a black Superman.

It is either fat trolling or I don't know what is going on in the head of a certain 'cubed.

So like half of a vocabulary for the Left-wingers, including words "male", "female", "men" and "women"?

Exactly. More support for my point above. WB was going woke - it's not a blanket statement or bias to say so.

AAnnndddd more....

Oh yeah that's right. "Black Superman". Another woke $#!( premise that was to-be at WB.....

And given my original post and the information above, you are just coming across as a denier using framing so as to appear informed, "rising above it all" with your keen thought. :roll:

Learn to accept accuracy or GTFOH instead of pretending at some "higher voice of reason". If you are going to be the "higher voice of reason" you have to actually be accurate. :roll:
Again, and most importantly - :roll:

It didn't start woke but it slowly started to sink in.

Wonder Woman wasn't woke but they pulled the whole 'woman-only' theaters ****.

Birds of Prey went the whole 'we're fighting against mysogny and MeeToo and make gaze' and that bs.

Wonder Woman 84 made the villain have several Trump-isms. For reasons.

Then all the upcoming movies and projects that suddenly started diving headfirst into the 'diversity and representation' crap.

And of course, Batwoman. Just.... Batwoman...

I must admit I'm at a loss at a loss at how bringing Michael Keaton to play his iconic version of Batman was supposed to be woke. Perhaps someone can explain to me because it's not just a stretch but flat out wrong.

Birds of Prey wasn't my cup of tea and wasn't really faithful to the comics but I fail to see what was woke about it other than people finding the concept of an all-female vigilante team to be woke which is stupid when Birds of Prey is a comic series from the 90s there is no reason they shouldn't have a movie. I've long had this theory that if many classic properties came out today they'd be attacked for supposedly being woke and stuff like this makes me think I'm on the money.

I'll give you Supergirl and Batgirl but they are just two examples and ones that may not ever make it to screen in anyway. Same with the black Superman projects but there has been a few black Supermans in the comics and it was inevitable that they'd think about incorporating one into the movies particularly at a time the audience doesn't seem receptive to anything resembling the classic version of the character.

That's the reason for all of this by the way. If someone's mind isn't so fixated on finding wokeness everywhere it would be plain to see the reason they are trying all these things is because the DCEU just commercially imploded. No one knows what to do with all the classic characters; Ben Affleck has spent the last few years wanting out and even though it seems he's open to returning to the role now it may just be for cameos. Cavill is desperate to play Superman but not for the money WB is offering. That's why they are experimenting with lesser known characters with cult followings like Billy Batson, Jaime Reyes etc. That's all they can do until the figure out how to coarse correct their mistake of letting a divisive film maker insert his decidedly non woke ideologies into properties there were an ill fit for.

If by framing you mean I'm citing specific examples and using facts to explain why they are woke or non-woke then yes.

some people are starting to conflate woke with racists. and the mere mention of the word gets them triggered. 'but, it's people like me!'...reeee

I don't think it was so much Keaton himself, but more like they were planning to take advantage of the fact that he's old to retire that version of Batman so Batgirl can replace him. It doesn't sound so bad on paper, but in execution it sounds less like 'Batgirl replaces Batman cause he's too old to continue' and more like 'Batgirl replaces Batman cause men suck and women are better, and Batman was probably racist and sexist anyway'.

Birds of Prey was Birds of Prey in name only. Not only were they seriously miscast, it really 'Harley Quinn and those other girls too'. Plus they ****ed up Cassandra so bad. The movie was one of those ultra-feminist 'every man in the movie is either dumb or evil cause of course they are' kinda movie, kinda like the modern Charlie's Angels.

What also doesn't help is all the marketing and all the interviews. If anything woke marketing is a female-led movie's worst enemy. Even if the movie isn't intended to be as such, they just can't help themselves with all the 'this movie will show men how it's done' and 'this movie is sure to piss off the manbabies' kind of marketing and interviews. Hell, something like the Black Widow had all the 'we're fighting the male gaze' marketing yet it's the movie that shows more shots of Scarjo's ass than any previous MCU movie with her in it.

Ironically, these are the same people that tried to blast Battle Angel Alita, a female led movie that only advertised itself as a bad-ass movie based on a bad-ass series. No woke or feminism undertones to be found. I'm not sure how well it did at the box office but the fact that people liked that one over Captain Marvel got the blue-hairs flipping out despite the fact that if they were truly feminists they should be glad that ANY women-led movie was finding success, not just their woke posterchild.

Perry White was also black in Man of Steel. His last name is Perry WHITE for a reason, otherwise he would be called Perry BLACK.

You kid, but the fact is that the producers were trying to stunt-cast that role as far back as 1992. Before they finally settled on the perfectly-cast Lane Smith to play Perry White on "Lois & Clark", it was announced in Wizard and other places that while they hadn't found an actor yet, Perry would "definitely" be black in the then-upcoming show. I guess there was backlash ("blacklash"?), because obviously that changed by the time the show came out. So then it was announced that instead Perry would be black in the next Superman movie (supposedly set for a 1996 release) which obviously never happened. The point is, they had their heart set on "black Perry White" for a very long time, and again, for no actual reason other than "Tee-hee... his name is 'White' and he'll be a black guy! How clever!" This is evidenced by waaaaaay back in '93, announcing publicly "the next Perry White will be black!" before they'd even had an actor read for the part. Obvious Stunt Casting Is Obvious. I hate sh*t like that, even when it works out.

And in Fishburne's case it definitely did work out fine - although it helps that he's pretty good just in general - but let's make no mistake, "finding the best actor for the role" was never the intention with that character. WB had their heart set on "Black Perry White" for over 25 years and finally got their wish; it was just a happy accident they also picked a great actor. Could've been Jamie Foxx for all they actually cared. I mean Chris Rock was signed up to play Jimmy Olsen at some point. None of this sh*t is new at all.

Personally, while I liked Fishburne just fine, I was a little sad that Hugh Laurie got passed over. He was supposed to play Perry in "Superman Returns" before scheduling conflicts made him leave, to be replaced by Frank Langella (who also did a great job), but I felt like he should've been brought in for "Man of Steel" as a courtesy. I think he would have done a fantastic job and especially within the world that Snyder created, he has a certain intensity I think really would have been great for the role. Ah well.
----------------

As for the marketing stuff, I really do despise when these action movies or comic book movies try and pull the "Chicks Rule, Guys Drool!" approach. It never, ever works, and it's because despite the fact that the internet has exposed that there are more women into that stuff than some people think, it's still a VERY tiny fraction of the audience for those products. Very broadly speaking, chicks don't care about action movies or comic books, they watch them to placate their boyfriends but very few actually like them enough to spend money on them or their associated product. It's a "boys space". Frankly, even making a "girl power" action movie at all is a very questionable business decision. The audience for it is SO small that it's hardly even worth attempting, and they always, always fail, for that exact reason. On one hand, the potential audience is so small you can't make profit, AND the marketing and message push all the male fans away as well. It's just a dumb thing to even bother with.

Oh is that why they are axing female lead movies yet keeping the flash film even though the lead actor has a questionable History?

What is this middle class America they speak of? Firing thousands of employees isn’t helping prove that.