![]() |
Biggest nitpicks with the MCU as an adaptation
Unrelated to any problems with the films themselves, what fundamental elements of the MCU bother you as the "definitive" live action representation of the comics?
Here are some of mine: - Probably my biggest one is Hank Pym having nothing to do with the creation of Ultron. I remember when the Phase 2 slate was released, it seemed pretty obvious that Age of Ultron was going to dovetail into Ant-Man. Wrong! - Goes hand in hand with the above, but Hank and Janet not being founding members of the Avengers. - Much of Tom Holland's Spidey lore having some gaping holes. No Oscorp, no Octavius, no Doctor Connors, apparently uncle Ben doesn't even exist, FAKE Daily Bugle. I could go on. Pretty much all because they're allergic to "retreading" any ground the previous crappy movies covered. Dumb. - Fantastic Four being such a late addition, but that was a legal thing. - Lame version of Adam Warlock. - Brie Larson as Carol and Elizabeth Warren as Mar-Vell. Carol should be about the same age as Tony Stark and have a commanding presence. What do we get? Waify little Brie Larson's scrawny ass. For all of Marvel's cringy virtue signaling, they had to get a young actress instead of appropriately casting a slightly older woman for this role. |
I have a comic with captain marvel in it and she is so like able compared to resting bitch face Larsons take
Smashing the godbomb storyline and Jane becoming Thor into one movie. It doesn’t work. Marvel really ****ed Thor so badly with his cast and supporting cast. |
- Constant removal of helmets/masks/ etc
- nano-tech cheat for EVERYTHING - blending/melding of single source-material characters into hybrids or other deviations - ignoring of source material to satisfy either "China" or "Gen Y Social Nonsense" |
Quote:
|
It's perfect, Marvel can do no wrong and had never reached a wider audience like it has because it is the best version. The MCU is literally the perfect version of the Marvel Universe.
Disney saved Marvel. |
Quote:
Ya this pisses me off too. Dont be surprised if doom does this in doomsday |
Quote:
The changed the Ancient One because of it. There was an entire character practically omitted from Age of Ultron because of it. Shang Chi was guided by it completely ruining the Mandarin as an iron Man villain. There was more too, but I can't recall at the moment..... |
Alright, let's begin:
|
I seem to remember something early on, either in Homecoming or Civil War, where Uncle Ben was lightly referenced. Like it was implied in some dialogue he was gone and missed. But then No Way Home comes out and it's like he never existed so they graft his story onto Aunt May... weird. Unneeded.
And obviously they need to let go of the characters aging with the actors and start recasting (which I think is finally going to happen with Secret Wars?). Everyone of the Avengers are going to be in their 80s by the time the X-Men are fully up and running and then who will care about a crossover then? And other things. Like now we can't even get a Daredevil-Black Widow story because they decided to kill her off at the same time as they were barely introducing Daredevil? I was also really looking forward to finally getting a proper Galactus but the whole thing was kind of nothing. |
I don't think they ever said Uncle Ben didn't exist? I vaguely recall him being referenced in the first movie but its been awhile seen I rewatched it so I could be wrong.
|
Yeah he does exist Peter's briefcase has the letters BFP on it.
|
The biggest missed opportunity was when they had both Toby and Andrew mention Uncle Ben and his famous saying, there was no reaction from Tom, or at least nothing that would imply he has an Uncle Ben too.
Like I know they wanted to fast-track Spider-Man since we already saw two versions of the origin/backstory, but we can assume Tom in Civil War was a post Uncle Ben Spider-Man. That one scene with Toby and Andrew just cemented the fact he either never knew an Uncle Ben or he decided to do good as Spider-Man just because. Like classic Spider-Man wanted to make some money with his powers and only became a superhero after the Uncle Ben incident. Maybe since Tom's world already has Avengers and such in it (he must have been watching TV or something during The Battle of New York), him gaining powers made him think he should be like them and be a hero too. Who knows? I mostly say this because without Uncle Ben, there has to be some reason Tom was already saving people. In the original comics, his particular story didn't really imply other heroes were running around. I believe back then the early comics that would explain the origins of Spider-Man, Iron Man, Daredevil, the Fantastic Four, etc are self-contained and never take into account that there are already 20 other superheroes already out there. |
Yeah, that moment with the other two Spider-Men should have been the place for Tom Holland's Spider-Man to finally tell his own Uncle Ben story... not to tell us that he doesn't have one. Because that's stupid. It'd be like a Batman without a Thomas and Martha Wayne story.
|
I guess cause they just killed Aunt May they didn't want to get repetitive, but I mean that would have been perfect. Tom could have said he lost his uncle and now aunt May too and then we can see Toby and Andrew can emote because neither can imagine losing their own aunt May. Character scene all around.
There was also a missed opportunity with Toby and Andrew reacting so seeing such a younger looking aunt May. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.