| Kid Icarus |
01-19-2004 07:27 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gremlin
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTN889
Who voted for original?!?!? are you serious? That game was terrible in my opinion.
|
Change "original" to Ocarina and I'm with ya. I've written several pages of arguments on why ocarina/majora/every 3D zelda is garbage, don't wanna tranlsate all that stuff into english tho. But I find it har to play a game whose camera likes filming a wall instead of something important. Almost every other aspect of the game is kinda crappy too if you ask me. It's not THAT bad, 3/5 would be my score for it since it's lacking tons of stuff to the all time superior "A Link to the Past".
Not trying to bash your opinions, just stating mine and I'll leave you free to think whatever you want about everything
|
The thing with the 3-D Zelda games that bothers me is how long you can walk with out really doing anything... Ocarina of Time's Hyrule Field is a prime example of that.
However, OoT gave the videogame industry a targeting system that could actually work, and it showed other developers how to include weapon combat in their games that wasn't bulky. Not to mention it was the first Zelda game to stress the story line more.
I voted for Zelda 1, but I really do like them all pretty evenly. Infact, LttP was the first Zelda I even managed to beat, and 4-Swords is stupidly fun when you have 4 people playing it XD. But if it wasn't for Zelda 1 there really woulden't be any adventure games, or ther Zelda games. about 70% of the games out there exist because Zelda 1 happend.
|