GoldenEye 2
 

It's officail, EA's next Bond game will not be the sequel to Everything or Nothing, but the sequel to GoldenEye. As it's set in 1995 (Well before John Cleese was even introduced as R) there is a possibility that Desmond Llewelyn's Q will be used.

1) Welcome to a month ago
2) Get over the fact that Cleese is Q
3) The game'll suck

Yowch.......a bit harsh, dontcha think.......?

Not really. The news is super old, he needs to get over the fact that Cleese is now Q, and the game revolves around you becoming the ultimate Bond villian, and I don't think EA can pull it off, especially since everyone will compare it to Goldeneye and it won't come near what it was.

Well I agree that it probably won't live up to everyone's expectations.

If you thought Zarius hates Venus, you should see what I think of Cleese, don't try me.

John Cleese SUCKS!

I think he's perfectly fine as R. It's a shame that Desmond Llewellyn passed away, but all things considered, I think they did a good job replacing him. John Cleese is a pretty damn funny guy.

I hate him no matter what he does. I wish I could see his decapitated head being pissed on by a herd of goats.

I couldn't think of someone else to play Q after Desmond passed on, I think he's doing a fine job.

Finally, someone who agrees with me.

I can, Peter Burton.

John Cleese is a legend, end of

I for one could careless if they are making Golden Eye 2. I thought the first game sucked. The graphics were horrid compared to a good PC fps, the multiplayer was average compared to a good PC fps, the control scheme was frustrating compared to a good PC fps... get my point? First Person Shooters belong at home, on the PC.

for me and everybody else that was never into PC games tho, it was a great game and kind of brought the FPS to a whole new audience. Plus the fact, it spawned Perfect Dark, one of my favorite games of all time.

Goldeneye was sweet, but Goldeneye 2 will be garbage, as most sequels are.

...story? and Yes I agree with you John Cleese is a Comedic God... :D

EA's Bond games haven't been too great... and lets face it, most of EA's games arn't that great (excluding their sports line, which is only rivaled by SEGA Sports).

Then again, the stupid consumers out there are gonna think it's an actual sequel to Goldeneye and buy it. -_-. Why'd they have to replace him? I think a corpse puppet is JUST what Bond needs.

Dude, if I had a quarter for everytime I've seen you say that something is garbage, I'd be chillin' with Donald Trump. Seriously.
"Anime now a days is garbage," "movies these days are garbage," "sequels are garbage." "Anything that's not an asian girl or Sailor Moon live action is garbage." Honestly, either your standards are too high, or you just plain need to lighten up.

No offense.

Well, he has a point with this one, seeing as the team that made Goldeneye won't have a thing to do with this game (go get Time Splitters 2... made by the same team).

That and EA's Bond games haven't been very good. *shrug*.

Actually, I think you do mean offense, and that's okay. I don't care. I'm just voicing my opinion, but I guess I can't do that according to you. Maybe my standards are too high, but I get tired of these horrible games that keep coming out.