Quote:
Originally Posted by neatoman
So I watched the scene where Spock explains his relationship with Sybock in Star Trek V, because the lack of Sybock in the STD flashbacks seemed odd to me. Sure enough, he does state they were raised together, meaning Sybock and Michael should have been as well and it's never brought up.
... Don't you just love the fact that Spock doesn't just have one but two siblings, both of whom are so irrelevant to him they're never ever brought up in the tiniest little way when it comes to Spock-centric stories that don't revolve around them directly?
|
It's not quite like when the moron fanboys go, "Why doesn't Kirk or Picard ever talk about the NX-01 Enterprise? Why isn't it in Picard's display of ships in his ready room??" because the answer is "It wasn't created yet!" Well, it is for Sybok... but Burnham does not have that excuse. When they made STD Sybok had been a thing for over 20 years... what's
their excuse, exactly?