Jurassic World

[sdp]

Here is the teaser:







Great teaser with all the iconic moments from the first film, full trailer this Thursday.

[Leo656]

Honestly, no, if we're applying any kind of real-world logic to this, I think after the San Francisco disaster, nobody could ever get the project off the ground. The legal liability alone would be far too great. They'd be impossible to insure, for one thing. No insurance company on EARTH would back them. "So... are you SURE that there is ZERO chance of another T-Rex getting loose and chewing apart another major city?" Absolutely impossible. They kind of ruined all future movies just with that one scene. It makes everything BUT "Godzilla, Times A Thousand" a completely implausible scenario, or at least anti-climactic.

Plus, there's those flying dinosaurs. I STILL think that's the biggest lingering plot thread. You have unregistered dinosaurs just flying the f*** around! "Rodan" has already taught us that even one of 'em is a huge problem, and now they're out in the wild, unchecked. And they have been for ten years by the time of this new flick. How is the entire planet not just a big pteranodon nest by now?

These are some things they ought to address. Instead, it kinda looks like they just want to do the first movie over, but Bigger.

[ObiWanFan4life]

Originally Posted by Leo656

Honestly, no, if we're applying any kind of real-world logic to this, I think after the San Francisco disaster, nobody could ever get the project off the ground. The legal liability alone would be far too great. They'd be impossible to insure, for one thing. No insurance company on EARTH would back them. "So... are you SURE that there is ZERO chance of another T-Rex getting loose and chewing apart another major city?" Absolutely impossible. They kind of ruined all future movies just with that one scene. It makes everything BUT "Godzilla, Times A Thousand" a completely implausible scenario, or at least anti-climactic.

Plus, there's those flying dinosaurs. I STILL think that's the biggest lingering plot thread. You have unregistered dinosaurs just flying the f*** around! "Rodan" has already taught us that even one of 'em is a huge problem, and now they're out in the wild, unchecked. And they have been for ten years by the time of this new flick. How is the entire planet not just a big pteranodon nest by now?

These are some things they ought to address. Instead, it kinda looks like they just want to do the first movie over, but Bigger.

May I remind you that the full trailer hasn't come out yet? I'm Sure they'll explain it there.

[TigerClaw]

Originally Posted by Leo656

Honestly, no, if we're applying any kind of real-world logic to this, I think after the San Francisco disaster, nobody could ever get the project off the ground. The legal liability alone would be far too great. They'd be impossible to insure, for one thing. No insurance company on EARTH would back them. "So... are you SURE that there is ZERO chance of another T-Rex getting loose and chewing apart another major city?" Absolutely impossible. They kind of ruined all future movies just with that one scene. It makes everything BUT "Godzilla, Times A Thousand" a completely implausible scenario, or at least anti-climactic.

Plus, there's those flying dinosaurs. I STILL think that's the biggest lingering plot thread. You have unregistered dinosaurs just flying the f*** around! "Rodan" has already taught us that even one of 'em is a huge problem, and now they're out in the wild, unchecked. And they have been for ten years by the time of this new flick. How is the entire planet not just a big pteranodon nest by now?

These are some things they ought to address. Instead, it kinda looks like they just want to do the first movie over, but Bigger.

I'm not a fan of bringing RL logic into movies, That just ruins the experience. There will be kids this generation, That will see Jurassic World for the first time and may want to watch the previous films.

You gotta let your imagination run wild and have fun. Its the reason why I go to the movies, To get away from RL.

That San Diego scene was my favorite scene on all the JP films, It really brought the imagination of a Dinosaur running amok in the City.

[Leo656]

I've seen ya. I'm aware you're not a huge fan of logic and movies occupying the same space at the same time.

You got yours an' I got mine, an' together we be fine, brother.

And I'unno if ya heard, but kids are literally incomplete people. Like, they're not even done baking, yet, and are incapable of any rational thought. I'm in no way obligated to care what they think. I don't ask my cat for advice on what makes good TV, I don't judge movies based on what kids like.

[Wildcat]

Ooh that hyped me even more. Love that orb ride thing.

The flying dinosaurs in JP3 is something I see brought up alot. I honestly think people are over thinking that.

First it was only a few following them in the air. They most likely didn't even follow them all the way back. Also I don't know far it is or remember if it was mentioned but I doubt a huge flock of those things would even bother to keep flying so far out and all over the world. Their habitat are those islands and have the ocean all around for food.

Its possible one or two would stray which they might explain in the new one. Also comparing a Pteranodon to Rodan is pretty ridiculous. That's comparing Godzilla to Trex.

Of course in real life a new park, if there was ever a first one, most likely would not be allowed to happen after all the circumstances but for the sake of the movie its at least plausible that that someone would work around the legal system and reopen it. They cloned dinosaurs... the whole world is not going to nod in agreement and forget about it.

[TigerClaw]

Dont think anyone posted this, But here's some plot details about the movie.

This film picks up twenty-two years after Jurassic Park. When Derek [Connolly] and I sat down to find the movie, we looked at the past two decades and talked about what we’ve seen. Two things came to the surface.

One was that money has been the gasoline in the engine of our biggest mistakes. If there are billions to be made, no one can resist them, even if they know things could end horribly.

The other was that our relationship with technology has become so woven into our daily lives, we’ve become numb to the scientific miracles around us. We take so much for granted.

[TigerClaw]

Leaked footage from the Trailer, But it looks kind of unfinished.

[AT-Man]

I hope it's not because of just another greedy fat f*ck that things start going downhill.

[Andrew NDB]

Seems both uninspired and uninspiring. And it's all going to come down to a genetically altered Z-Rex or something? With none of the cast from the originals, not even the kids? I dunno...

[TigerClaw]

Originally Posted by Andrew NDB

Seems both uninspired and uninspiring. And it's all going to come down to a genetically altered Z-Rex or something? With none of the cast from the originals, not even the kids? I dunno...

Actually BD Wong is the only cast member from the original.

[Leo656]

Actually, not having any of the original cast involved is one of the things that does make sense. Bottom line, nobody who had been through that situation would ever go through it again, and that's why the sequels didn't work (aside from constantly rehashing moments from the first one... "Oh, look, someone's elbows-deep in dino dung. AGAIN." ). To me, seeing Goldblum and whatsisname come back in II and III was pretty contrived.

Ariana Richards grew up pretty nice, though. She can come back.

[TigerClaw]

Originally Posted by Leo656

Actually, not having any of the original cast involved is one of the things that does make sense. Bottom line, nobody who had been through that situation would ever go through it again, and that's why the sequels didn't work (aside from constantly rehashing moments from the first one... "Oh, look, someone's elbows-deep in dino dung. AGAIN." ). To me, seeing Goldblum and whatsisname come back in II and III was pretty contrived.

Ariana Richards grew up pretty nice, though. She can come back.

For this sequel, From what I read, another company bought iGen and decided to create the Park because it would make them billions of dollars. The Park becomes a success and they had years without any problems.

The movie will pick up with the Park not getting any more visitors, Cause people have gotten bored of the exhibits and such, So the scientists decided to create a new Dinosaur by modifying the DNA, And that's when things go wrong, They have a new Dinosaur called the D-Rex

Concept Art of the D-Rex



These are leaked images of the D-Rex Toys.

[TheCanadiandrome]

that new Dino looks cool

[pennydreadful]

Originally Posted by TigerClaw

The movie will pick up with the Park not getting any more visitors, Cause people have gotten bored of the exhibits and such, So the scientists decided to create a new Dinosaur by modifying the DNA, And that's when things go wrong, They have a new Dinosaur called the D-Rex

Which, right there, is crazy - because how could anybody possibly get bored by dinosaurs? People are fascinated by them, and they've been dead for millions of years. People line up in droves to look at their bones. If we lived in a world where I could see real-life dinosaurs, I'd go there every Tuesday and twice on Sundays!

I can't lie though, I'm interested in seeing what this movie has to offer. I'm curious to know what they've modified the D-Rex to do in order to bring visitors in... I'm guessing something silly like "make it more vicious" or something? To appease the people who got bored waiting for T-Rex to come out and eat the goat during daytime?

I really hope the raptors get a good chunk of the action though. It'd be nice if the Dilophosaurus got a minute or two as well; I always thought they were pretty nifty and they never got mentioned again after the first movie. Spielberg added in the frill and venom ideas to his depiction of the creature so it could've been an interesting way to include some of the progressively "selective" gene splices that InGen had done on the dinosaurs in order to mix and match traits.

[The Stryker]

The thing is named Diabolus?

Did they WANT it to cause problems?

[TigerClaw]

Originally Posted by The Stryker

The thing is named Diabolus?

Did they WANT it to cause problems?

Its a new Dinosaur that has genes of a cuttlefish, a snake, a velociraptor and a T-Rex.

[Sumac]

Honestly, no, if we're applying any kind of real-world logic to this, I think after the San Francisco disaster, nobody could ever get the project off the ground.

By that so called "real logic" nobody should have invetsed into building cruise liners after Titanic, but...

Besides, it was obvious, that as long as dinosaurus are alive at Nublar, somebody will try to find a way to profit from it somehow.

As for modified T-Rex, this stuff looks stupid. Controlling "normal" T-Rexes must be pain in the ass, and they create something even more dangerous and vicious...

[TigerClaw]

The Jurassic World trailer has been released early.

[Leo656]

Originally Posted by Sumac

By that so called "real logic" nobody should have invetsed into building cruise liners after Titanic, but...

Besides, it was obvious, that as long as dinosaurus are alive at Nublar, somebody will try to find a way to profit from it somehow.

Um... you're really gonna compare a sinking boat to a major city being attacked by a dinosaur? Really?

Because one of those things happens all the time and is more or less considered "normal", if tragic... the other thing - that being the city of San Francisco being attacked by a goddamn dinosaur - never happens, and if it happened ONCE, it would be considered Too Many Times. If anything, the U.S. government would have ordered the entire island bombed to smithereens, just to make SURE it never happened again.

No offense, but even Reed Richards would have to stretch a little farther than normal to connect those two dots the way you tried to. I mean, I get that you're trying to justify JP existing as more than just One Movie - doesn't work, but I get why people try - but that particular attempt was pretty shallow.