![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Foot Elite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,170
|
EA Trying Not to Be a Greedy "Beast," CEO Says
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/ea-.../1100-6434011/
Quote:
__________________
Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/Dead2009/
Backloggd: https://backloggd.com/u/Dead2009/ Dropkickd: https://www.dropkickd.com/user/Dead2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Second Gear
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The New World
Posts: 15,422
|
How are they charging you an arm and a leg to play online multiplayer? What are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 43,895
|
Maybe they should do away with their $50 Battlefront season pass.
Should be $20 at most. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Foot Elite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,708
|
EA sells a lot of DLC, but they are pretty good about using DLC that's nonessential, and easy to ignore. I play FIFA, Battlefront and UFC, and I've been perfectly content to not buy anything extra. Nothing as bad as Mortal Kombat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Second Gear
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The New World
Posts: 15,422
|
I'm glad I really didn't care much about MKX. Between that and Batman, it really seems like WB is gunning for that title EA has been trying to get rid of for years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Like, stupid rich.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Rawkzone
Posts: 2,808
|
The price of Battlefront is pretty gross, to be honest. I've begrudgingly accepted that this is the new norm; that almost every major release will be flooded with more and more DLC, and the main game is coming out more and more bare bones than ever. But with Battlefront it just seems so obvious its insulting. I mean compare this to Battlefront 2 which came out ten years ago...
Battlefront 2 (2005) (before any DLC) Heroes and Villains: Obi-Wan Kenobi, Yoda, Mace Windu, Ki-Adi-Mundi, Aayla Secura, Anakin, Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, Chewbacca, Princess Leia, Count Dooku, General Grievous, Jango Fett, Darth Maul, Darth Sidious, Darth Vader, Emperor Palpatine, Boba Fett, Sith Anakin Skywalker Total: 19 Maps: 27 SW Battlefront (2015) (before any DLC) Heroes and VIllains: Luke, Han, Leia, Darth Vader, Emperor Palpatine, Boba Fett Total: 6 Maps: 12 (based on 4 locations.) Not to mention obvious things like Battlefront 2 had a real story campaign, space battles, being able to fly from the planet into outer space... You just can't tell me with a straight face that they didn't deliberately strip the game down to the absolute minimum content. And then to get the "rest" of the game, you need to pay for the game all over again at the price point they're asking. Do you need to buy it? No, of course not. But then you've still paid 70 bucks for an incomplete game. EA's not the problem to be honest. It's just the way things are. DLC is the main attraction of games now. This is, sadly, the most logical way game companies are capitalizing on it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Foot Elite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,708
|
And really, it's kind of weird that game prices didn't go up, this generation. I'd rather they man up and cross the $60 line than to sell all this DLC. (I don't know where you got $70 from.) The number of maps in Battlefront was disappointing. Not enough to make me buy more. It's still a fun game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Second Gear
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The New World
Posts: 15,422
|
I'm not going to defend Battlefront's price, especially where the awful DLC is concerned, but comparing a late-gen sequel with multiple reused assests made in 2005 to something like the new Battlefront reeks of ignorance on multiple levels.
No thanks! It already costs $90 to buy a f*cking game here. I'd prefer developers to shoot for something more interesting and cost effective than "Ultra realistic" when it comes to their art styles. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Foot Elite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,708
|
That's fine. There are tons and tons of brand new games for $10, $15, $20. There has never been more cheap games on the market, and a lot of the time, they're the interesting, creative ones. I'm just saying that these "ultra realistic," "AAA" titles are super expensive to make. The development costs and times are going up, but the price has a locked max, for some reason. Those are usually the games with the most paid DLC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Like, stupid rich.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Rawkzone
Posts: 2,808
|
Quote:
I'd also argue with an IP like Star Wars, it has the budget to merit a larger, more full release. It's not like this is a new unknown FPS game that they're hoping sells well. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|