![]() |
|
|
#21 | |
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,999
|
Quote:
I guess who's the most popular at the moment can be measured by who's starring in their latest movie or something. Batman definitely definitely felt huge when the Heath ledger and Christian Bale Batman movie came out. But a few years before that, Spider-Man felt bigger with the Tobey Maguire and James Franco Spider-Man trilogy. I'm gonna guess Batman also was huge in the 80s and early 90s with the Tim Burton movies and the Batman TAS, but then dropped off a for about a decade until the Nolan movies again. None of the big 3 stop being famous, but clearly each have had their peaks in popularity. Easier for the general audience to remember their existence and care about them when their newest big blockbuster movie is coming out. I always felt Spider-Man was slightly inferior to Superman and Batman. No reason in particular. I just feel that way. I could be wrong. He's huge but always seemed like the smallest of the big 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
I Married a Duck!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The bowels of Hell, Texas(otherwise known as Decatur)
Posts: 8,773
|
Well, to be fair, he hasn't been around nearly as long. His first appearance was only in 1964, so he's relatively "young" compared to those two. And he is more street-level hero than Supes, so not as many big "saving the world" type stories, but he's got powers, unlike Bats, so he tends to go up against bigger threats, which puts him somewhere in the middle of the two in terms of what can be done with him. That, and his rogues gallery is not as well known as Batman's, but better than most of Superman's.
__________________
"You IDIOTS! You've captured their STUNT doubles!" -from "Spaceballs" "Where Science ends, magic begins." -Spiral, Uncanny X-Men #491 My various stories and fan-fics are now here- https://m.fanfiction.net/u/4770494/#end |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 43,887
|
Batman, or BatGod as I like to call him, probably would have been my #1 franchise had the Ninja Turtles franchise never been created. Like say PL and Kevin Eastman never created the Turtles back in 1984 and they never existed, I probably would be some huge Batman fan right now posting on some Batman forum for the last 20 years.
Batman 1989 movie came out when I was 4 years old, and then Batman: TAS came out in 1992, so I was the kid target audience when all this was happening. I always liked Batman, but of course TMNT was my #1 all throughout the 80's and 90's so I was swept up in that instead. It actually really puts into perspective how your fandom interest really depends on what was around when you were a kid growing up and what you got into. Had I been born a decade earlier or a decade later, I'd probably like completely different things. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Detoxed Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 11,222
|
How long before he's public domain?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,999
|
Quote:
If I had never gotten into the Turtles... I dunno. Would I even have a number 1 thing or just cycle through several different properties depending on my mood? But I'm gonna make a wild guess and say Nintendo in general. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 11,089
|
15 years.
Eh... It's entering "not even worth it" territory now. It might even be considered unconstitutional to lebby for the extension of copyright at this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Technodrome Technician
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: third earth
Posts: 4,737
|
??????
Can you please explain I would probably say Batman if you look at monthly comic book sales or at least when I last looked. Batman was regularly on top unless a new #1 came out also Marvel has been doing bad from what I am understanding. If we are talking outside of comics IDK its hard to say who the most popular, but its safe to assume its one of those three.
__________________
GT:Reedeamer THE TECHNODROME REDESIGN 2015 http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/showthread.php?t=51594
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
Lots of different factors go into the discussion of popularity. One could cite comics sales, but those have been down across the board for some time. Likewise, movie tickets are one indicator of popularity but not the largest or only one.
Toys are a reasonable indicator of popularity. On any given day between 1989 and Right Now, you could go into any place that sells toys and buy a Batman figure, often having many to choose from. That's not always true for other popular characters like Superman, Iron Man, Captain America or Spider-Man, who mostly get space on toy shelves when there's a new movie out, but are not a constant presence otherwise. There's not a constant flood of new toys out for them; meanwhile, Mattel has had a new Batman line out for several months that's not even connected to anything specific. Seemingly, "Batman sells, let's do a new toy line" is the only real reason, and that happens all the time, whether there's a new movie or show or not. Adding everything together, I have to say that Batman is most likely the most popular super-hero, if not the most popular fictional character, period. BUT, I think there have been brief windows in the last 20 years where Spider-Man, Wolverine, and Iron Man have each been more popular, but only for a Hot Minute, and it's usually when a new movie comes out. I prefer Superman, but credit where it's due. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,999
|
The idea I've always had is that Marvel overall has more popular characters than DC, but Batman and Superman are more popular than any Marvel character. Marvel seems to have a lot of quite well known superheroes who are all more or less on the same level of popularity and only below Spider-man in the totem pole, while DC seems to have a big drop-off after Batman and Superman. Who are the biggest DC superheroes after Batman and Superman? Wonder Woman? Aquaman?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
At the moment probably Wonder Woman and Aquaman, but a year ago Aquaman wouldn't have been part of the conversation at all.
After Superman, Batman & Wonder Woman, Flash and Green Lantern have consistently been the most popular DC characters. The "Trinity" are the only super-hero characters to have been published non-stop since 1940 or before, while Flash and Green Lantern have been consistently in print since the 1960s. Aquaman, by comparison, may have had a hit movie very recently, but before that he's never been a big seller and has always had trouble staying in print. He's often gone several years without having a book; either he's "dead" or just not doing anything important. So Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Flash and Green Lantern are the undisputed DC Top 5, but after that it's very tough to say. Partly because a lot of the more popular characters like Nightwing are consistently part of a team book, which makes it hard to determine individual popularity. There have also been far fewer DC cartoons, TV shows and movies than Marvel ones, so it's tough to gauge from that angle as well. Green Arrow's popularity got a bump with the TV show, but he's another character whose comic has never been very popular and doesn't move any toys, so it's like he's only "popular" with one specific audience. On the flip side, Harley Quinn has skyrocketed in popularity due to her constant media exposure in recent years, but frankly, her character is rather crap, objectively, and a lot of comics fans are thoroughly annoyed with and sick of her. So she moves a lot of merchandise but she also triggers a lot of resentment. She's inarguably very popular right now but who knows if that will still be the case in 20 years. DC is a lot like the WWE. It's easy to tell who the Top Stars are, but after those 5 or 6 the entire "midcard" is kind of on the same level. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,999
|
Quote:
Right Green Lantern is from DC. I know him only because you and Andrew had a long discussion about him last summer or so. Had no idea Flash was from DC and I honestly had to google the guy to remember who he was. Anyway, DC comes more across as being more adult while Marvel comes across as being more childish. Dunno why, but I always had that feeling. The very few batman and Superman movies I've watched seemed rather well grounded and more appealing to older audiences, while Spider-Man's and X-Men's movies I watched when I was a kid/teen seemed to cater more to younger audiences. I can't help but notice that older adults seem to have more respect for Batman and Superman compared to other superheroes... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 10,481
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|