a new Harry Potter movie - Page 2

DarkNinja · 10-17-2003, 09:42 PM

they didn't show everything for movies 1 and 2, and every book has been getting longer. I don't know how they are going to keep it together, cause all the plots eventually run into one another. A good Harry Potter movie would have to be atleast 5 hours long to get everything in, especially book 5.

**Jo Dawn** · 10-17-2003, 10:00 PM

Oh yeah, the movies definitly need to be longer. Now, in the books, it's like almost everything is really important to the story. Lots of details. Last I heard, the movie people were considering either doing a four hour movie with an intermission, or making the movies really long, and having them have two parts for each movie, released on different days.

That might've changed, though, but there's always hope...

*J Legault* · 10-17-2003, 10:10 PM

Ya I'm not sure how many Based off Book Movie would only have less detail. Since for me I thought the 2 movies did a good job. Yes mostly the off subject parts would have to be taken out. Even when I viewed the deleted scene I can tell that there were some parts not nessary to show or just waisted time.

But the movies did do good didn't they?

DarkNinja · 10-17-2003, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Legault

Ya I'm not sure how many Based off Book Movie would only have less detail. Since for me I thought the 2 movies did a good job. Yes mostly the off subject parts would have to be taken out. Even when I viewed the deleted scene I can tell that there were some parts not nessary to show or just waisted time.

But the movies did do good didn't they?

They did very well, but books 4 and 5 are over twice as long as books one and two.

*J Legault* · 10-20-2003, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkNinja

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Legault

Ya I'm not sure how many Based off Book Movie would only have less detail. Since for me I thought the 2 movies did a good job. Yes mostly the off subject parts would have to be taken out. Even when I viewed the deleted scene I can tell that there were some parts not nessary to show or just waisted time.

But the movies did do good didn't they?

They did very well, but books 4 and 5 are over twice as long as books one and two.

The WB network might make those 2, 3 hours long or atleast enough time to fit everything. They'll find a way you'll see.

**Barkworm** · 10-21-2003, 12:37 AM

I wish they would finally show us some Dementor pics. I also wish the new movie would be about three hours long.

Brinatello · 10-21-2003, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barkworm

Who the hell is Lord "Voldermont"???

Voldemort is an evil wizard responsible for killing Harry's parents. He tried to kill Harry as well when he was a baby, but the spell backfired on him and the only thing Harry was left with was his famous lightning bolt scar. All throughout the series, we see (or sometimes don't see) Voldemort still trying his damndest to destroy Harry. Book 5 is a good example of not seeing Voldemort at all until the very end, but during the book, he has ways of making Harry suffer. K, that's all I'm gonna say as far as spoilers go. Ya just gotta READ the books! For very good visuals, watch the movies, too. When I read book 5, all I kept seeing was visions from the films! Very cool!

10-17-2003, 09:42 PM	#21
DarkNinja Foot Soldier Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: USA Posts: 162	they didn't show everything for movies 1 and 2, and every book has been getting longer. I don't know how they are going to keep it together, cause all the plots eventually run into one another. A good Harry Potter movie would have to be atleast 5 hours long to get everything in, especially book 5. __________________ Do not think that you have to win, rather, think that you do not have to lose. -Gichin Funakoshi

10-17-2003, 10:00 PM	#22
Jo Dawn Inactive Moderator Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Authority On All Things Don Posts: 5,190	Oh yeah, the movies definitly need to be longer. Now, in the books, it's like almost everything is really important to the story. Lots of details. Last I heard, the movie people were considering either doing a four hour movie with an intermission, or making the movies really long, and having them have two parts for each movie, released on different days. That might've changed, though, but there's always hope... __________________

10-17-2003, 10:10 PM	#23
J Legault Mad Scientist Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: West Coast Posts: 2,054	Ya I'm not sure how many Based off Book Movie would only have less detail. Since for me I thought the 2 movies did a good job. Yes mostly the off subject parts would have to be taken out. Even when I viewed the deleted scene I can tell that there were some parts not nessary to show or just waisted time. But the movies did do good didn't they? __________________ I am a fan of TMNT and I'm still one today. I got into the habbit back in 1992 or 93' when I was little. I would like to thank my 2 year older cousin for getting me in the habbit. 2001 was when I revised my knowledge on TMNT. And today I'm a bigger fan than I was years ago. I have all 3 TMNT Movies, current Toon, and old school Toon on DVD.

10-21-2003, 12:37 AM	#26
Barkworm Draconian leftist ruler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Germany Posts: 6,766	I wish they would finally show us some Dementor pics. I also wish the new movie would be about three hours long. __________________ Make ****, not kill!