Worst sequels ever! - Page 4

Grave · 05-18-2004, 09:33 AM

Mostly all sequels..I can't name any in particular. The only one I can think of that was not horrible is Terminator 2.
Im not working right today.

*Drtooth* · 05-18-2004, 12:18 PM

Well, I agree with "Any Disney Cheapqual, " But I have to exclude Lion King 2. It proved that if they put their minds to it, they could make a great seqaul. Not as good as the original, but then again, it's not as bad as Cinderella 2. Now what the shell was the point of that?!? Didn't see Lion King 1 1/2 yet, but I hear it's pretty good. At least they tried to get the original voice actors back. Dammit. Tarzan had potential for a sequal... and they squandered it. Extreemly Goofy Movie is pretty good as well... if you ignore the multiple advertisements for ESPN. And Lilo and Stitch 2 is pretty alright.

But I have to say, I think TMNT 2 was much worse than TMNT 3.... I mean, I have to see 2 again, but considering it was just a lame plot of Shredder returning, quashing potential for a story about Utroms, and had Vanilla Ice in it.... a weird trip to Ancient Japan isn't so bad....

*Hannah* · 05-18-2004, 02:15 PM

THE LAND BEFORE TIME. OMFG, it is so crappy. What's the latest sequel now? 12?

**Jo Dawn** · 05-18-2004, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~KenaI~

THE LAND BEFORE TIME. OMFG, it is so crappy. What's the latest sequel now? 12?

I've never seen past two... But I've seen parts of 3 or 4, not sure which.

Peanut · 05-18-2004, 02:39 PM

I've seen them all. My mom loves them. They aren't so bad. Could be worse without a doubt.

05-18-2004, 09:33 AM	#61
Grave Random Punk Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 23	Mostly all sequels..I can't name any in particular. The only one I can think of that was not horrible is Terminator 2. Im not working right today. __________________ All thats left when you think you've done wrong is the feel of a cold heart... <3Stryker<3

05-18-2004, 12:18 PM	#62
Drtooth Foot Elite Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 4,439	Well, I agree with "Any Disney Cheapqual, " But I have to exclude Lion King 2. It proved that if they put their minds to it, they could make a great seqaul. Not as good as the original, but then again, it's not as bad as Cinderella 2. Now what the shell was the point of that?!? Didn't see Lion King 1 1/2 yet, but I hear it's pretty good. At least they tried to get the original voice actors back. Dammit. Tarzan had potential for a sequal... and they squandered it. Extreemly Goofy Movie is pretty good as well... if you ignore the multiple advertisements for ESPN. And Lilo and Stitch 2 is pretty alright. But I have to say, I think TMNT 2 was much worse than TMNT 3.... I mean, I have to see 2 again, but considering it was just a lame plot of Shredder returning, quashing potential for a story about Utroms, and had Vanilla Ice in it.... a weird trip to Ancient Japan isn't so bad.... __________________ [Insert mildly amusing banner here]

05-18-2004, 02:15 PM	#63
Hannah Once more, with feeling! Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 4,111	THE LAND BEFORE TIME. OMFG, it is so crappy. What's the latest sequel now? 12? __________________

05-18-2004, 02:39 PM	#65
Peanut Second Gear Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The New World Posts: 15,422	I've seen them all. My mom loves them. They aren't so bad. Could be worse without a doubt.