Great news about Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows!! - Page 3

*BubblyShell22* · 03-19-2008, 08:59 AM

POA was okay, except they left out Lupin revealing that he was one of the Marauders and that Harry's dad and Sirius were also a part of the Marauders. That bugged me to no end.

I thought OOTP was very good. Imelda Staunton was awesome as Umbridge.

Having the final book in two movies is a good thing because it means they may not have to do too much editing with it. I'm quite excited to see these movies.

*Tinuvielsdreams* · 03-21-2008, 07:48 PM

I was so happy when I heard about this! The movie I thought would have really benefited from having 2 parts would have been the goblet of fire. There are just so many details that unfortunately have to be ignored.

Peanut · 03-21-2008, 09:02 PM

I would have said OotP.

GoF was fine in terms of plot points, but some of the changes they made were just completely unnecessary. I would have gladly lost that stupid scene where the kids are taught how to dance in exchange for 10 minutes worth of Winky stuff. And it was simple things like Harry not having to say "pine fresh" to enter the prefects bathroom, Neville being the one to give Harry the Gillyweed instead of Dobby, the entirety of the Quidditch Cup scene, etc etc. The list for GoF could really just keep going.

OotP was just an utter mess in every regard. So much, in fact, that I still haven't even bought it. I saw it once in the theatre and that was it.

03-19-2008, 08:59 AM	#41
BubblyShell22 Leo-holic Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Indiana Posts: 16,912	POA was okay, except they left out Lupin revealing that he was one of the Marauders and that Harry's dad and Sirius were also a part of the Marauders. That bugged me to no end. I thought OOTP was very good. Imelda Staunton was awesome as Umbridge. Having the final book in two movies is a good thing because it means they may not have to do too much editing with it. I'm quite excited to see these movies.

03-21-2008, 07:48 PM	#42
Tinuvielsdreams Nothing without passion Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Pennsylvania Posts: 1,722	I was so happy when I heard about this! The movie I thought would have really benefited from having 2 parts would have been the goblet of fire. There are just so many details that unfortunately have to be ignored.

03-21-2008, 09:02 PM	#43
Peanut Second Gear Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The New World Posts: 15,422	I would have said OotP. GoF was fine in terms of plot points, but some of the changes they made were just completely unnecessary. I would have gladly lost that stupid scene where the kids are taught how to dance in exchange for 10 minutes worth of Winky stuff. And it was simple things like Harry not having to say "pine fresh" to enter the prefects bathroom, Neville being the one to give Harry the Gillyweed instead of Dobby, the entirety of the Quidditch Cup scene, etc etc. The list for GoF could really just keep going. OotP was just an utter mess in every regard. So much, in fact, that I still haven't even bought it. I saw it once in the theatre and that was it.