Nintendo and Super Nintendo - Page 2

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-05-2003, 07:53 PM

Yes, it was for Playstation, they made so many megaman games for that system...the 3-d ones were legends series i think, but then if you want a taste of how 3-d turns a good game crappy, play Megaman 64, LOL!.

Mario 64 was bad for mario, I haven't played sunshine yet though... I'd rather stick to mario party, that is a fun game...

The sonic adventures are such crap...the music is such garbage, they got a stupid band to do there own music instead of actually using instruments to make their own toons...

Deepflame · 01-06-2003, 07:13 AM

"Mario 64 was bad for mario"

Why was it bad for Mario?

**Karpo_007** · 01-06-2003, 07:27 AM

It was a good game. Not he best in the series, but still very good. Personnaly, I like the snes ones the most.

Peanut · 01-06-2003, 10:39 AM

Mega Man 64 is essentially Mega Man Legends for PSX. Mega Man Legends 2 was a much better game. BTW I don't know what you're begining to talk about tokka. Mario 64 was bad for the series? I suppose LoZ:OoT was bad for the Legend of Zelda series too right?

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-06-2003, 02:47 PM

How many times do i have to say I never played a Zelda game???

Anyway, Mario 64 just served no purpose...I mean, was the object to get all the stars or to beat bowser or what??? I mean, there was no level order or anything, I just didn't see the point...whatever

**Karpo_007** · 01-06-2003, 03:05 PM

Well It was a good game, maybe it didn't have a good story behind it, but mario games never do. It's about game play. And it was great.

Deepflame · 01-06-2003, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tokka

How many times do i have to say I never played a Zelda game???

Anyway, Mario 64 just served no purpose...I mean, was the object to get all the stars or to beat bowser or what??? I mean, there was no level order or anything, I just didn't see the point...whatever

Oh my god! That's the best reason for a game not being good I've heard for years! I'm totally on your side now, Tokka. <not>

The purpose, in nearly all Mario's adventures, have been to save the Mushroom kingdom from Bowser/Koopa/whatever, and that's usually it.
So that doesn't make SM 64 different from the others concerning that point, right?
Objective one: Beat Bowser
Objectvie two (only if you found Ob.1 not too challenging): Find all the stars.
Fully understandable, yes.

And the freedom to chose level freely was very good, I don't see anything wrong with that.

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-06-2003, 03:33 PM

I don't know...some of the gameplay was a bit shaky...They were clearly experimenting with 3-d with this game, having no intention on making it quality, since only the name won it big bucks, lol

**Karpo_007** · 01-06-2003, 03:52 PM

It was voted for the bes game of the year in many places... And it is the game that basicly started the 3d platformer genre.

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-06-2003, 04:40 PM

No wonder that genre is so bad...

Peanut · 01-06-2003, 04:41 PM

Tokka that last remark has just shown me what kind of a gamer you are. Basically that's no kind of gamer at all.

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-06-2003, 05:06 PM

So I am not a gamer cause I don't like 3-d games? Who are you?!?!?

**Karpo_007** · 01-07-2003, 05:19 AM

Just to let you know, 90% of the games today are 3d...

*Nickokapo* · 01-07-2003, 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deepflame

"Mario 64 was bad for mario"

Oh no, poor mario!
Someone get mario a psychiatrist..

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-07-2003, 04:26 PM

Ok, I wrote that wrong...I meant I hate most 3-d games...and I realize 90% of them are 3-d, which is why I like the old games...Hmm, for some reason I assumed you knew that, oh well...

*Nickokapo* · 01-07-2003, 04:29 PM

Can someone please think of mario?!

I like games, doesn't matter if it's 2d or 3d, as long as it's a good game

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-07-2003, 04:32 PM

Ummm, what for?!?

Peanut · 01-07-2003, 06:04 PM

No ture gamer in the world can say Mario 64 was a non-quality game. Bottom Line.

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-07-2003, 06:29 PM

Sorry to burst your bubble, but not everyone has to like what you like in order to be what you call a "true gamer"......

Peanut · 01-08-2003, 02:40 PM

No that's not exactly what I mean. I mean there isn't a respectable gamer who can say Mario 64 was a bad game.

01-06-2003, 07:13 AM	#22
Deepflame Hench Mutant Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Deep below the mountains... Posts: 254	"Mario 64 was bad for mario" Why was it bad for Mario? __________________ NoOo! The killer scarfs attack!

01-07-2003, 04:29 PM	#36
Nickokapo Emperor Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Argentina Posts: 5,802	Can someone please think of mario?! I like games, doesn't matter if it's 2d or 3d, as long as it's a good game __________________

01-05-2003, 07:53 PM	#21
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	Yes, it was for Playstation, they made so many megaman games for that system...the 3-d ones were legends series i think, but then if you want a taste of how 3-d turns a good game crappy, play Megaman 64, LOL!. Mario 64 was bad for mario, I haven't played sunshine yet though... I'd rather stick to mario party, that is a fun game... The sonic adventures are such crap...the music is such garbage, they got a stupid band to do there own music instead of actually using instruments to make their own toons...

01-06-2003, 07:27 AM	#23
Karpo_007 Inactive Moderator Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Finland Posts: 8,798	It was a good game. Not he best in the series, but still very good. Personnaly, I like the snes ones the most.

01-06-2003, 10:39 AM	#24
Peanut Second Gear Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The New World Posts: 15,422	Mega Man 64 is essentially Mega Man Legends for PSX. Mega Man Legends 2 was a much better game. BTW I don't know what you're begining to talk about tokka. Mario 64 was bad for the series? I suppose LoZ:OoT was bad for the Legend of Zelda series too right?

01-06-2003, 02:47 PM	#25
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	How many times do i have to say I never played a Zelda game??? Anyway, Mario 64 just served no purpose...I mean, was the object to get all the stars or to beat bowser or what??? I mean, there was no level order or anything, I just didn't see the point...whatever

01-06-2003, 03:05 PM	#26
Karpo_007 Inactive Moderator Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Finland Posts: 8,798	Well It was a good game, maybe it didn't have a good story behind it, but mario games never do. It's about game play. And it was great.

01-06-2003, 03:33 PM	#28
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	I don't know...some of the gameplay was a bit shaky...They were clearly experimenting with 3-d with this game, having no intention on making it quality, since only the name won it big bucks, lol

01-06-2003, 03:52 PM	#29
Karpo_007 Inactive Moderator Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Finland Posts: 8,798	It was voted for the bes game of the year in many places... And it is the game that basicly started the 3d platformer genre.

01-06-2003, 04:40 PM	#30
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	No wonder that genre is so bad...

01-06-2003, 04:41 PM	#31
Peanut Second Gear Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The New World Posts: 15,422	Tokka that last remark has just shown me what kind of a gamer you are. Basically that's no kind of gamer at all.

01-06-2003, 05:06 PM	#32
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	So I am not a gamer cause I don't like 3-d games? Who are you?!?!?

01-07-2003, 05:19 AM	#33
Karpo_007 Inactive Moderator Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Finland Posts: 8,798	Just to let you know, 90% of the games today are 3d...

01-07-2003, 04:26 PM	#35
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	Ok, I wrote that wrong...I meant I hate most 3-d games...and I realize 90% of them are 3-d, which is why I like the old games...Hmm, for some reason I assumed you knew that, oh well...

01-07-2003, 04:32 PM	#37
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	Ummm, what for?!?

01-07-2003, 06:04 PM	#38
Peanut Second Gear Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The New World Posts: 15,422	No ture gamer in the world can say Mario 64 was a non-quality game. Bottom Line.

01-07-2003, 06:29 PM	#39
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	Sorry to burst your bubble, but not everyone has to like what you like in order to be what you call a "true gamer"......

01-08-2003, 02:40 PM	#40
Peanut Second Gear Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The New World Posts: 15,422	No that's not exactly what I mean. I mean there isn't a respectable gamer who can say Mario 64 was a bad game.