HULK SMASH PUNY HUMANS!.....Hulk lonely....;_;

~~Leo656~~ · 06-10-2003, 05:31 PM

Tokka: Yes, it really does seem a little too heavy on the CGI effects, and that bothers me a little bit, but I've heard the story is really good and that to me is more important than the special effects. I'm looking forward to it. But I do agree with you at least in part about the CGI, I hope it looks better in the actual movie than it does in the trailers. Too many movies rely on CGI nowadays, I miss when directors actually had to create special effects instead of just having people push buttons on a keyboard.

Matthew: Yea, it sure seems that way doesn't it? It all started with Blade... when Blade made money, Marvel finally went ahead with a lot of their long-planned movie projects like X-Men and Spider-Man. Now that the money is rolling in, they're apparently gonna bring some of their other long-awaited movies to life. I know Hulk and Fantastic Four have been in various stages of planning for at least ten years.

Fantastic Four was actually completed back in 1993 or so, but it was shelved on the grounds that it was... well... terrible.

Iron Man... I will probably see it, but I'm not much of an Iron Man fan. This one seems like a "cash in on the Marvel Movie Craze" decision, since I haven't heard anything about it since recently. Same goes for Ghost Rider and Punisher. Wasn't that Dolph Lundren movie enough? LoL I think they just wanna make up for the fact that they didn't put the skull on his shirt the first time around.

The one good thing about all this is it has DC interested in making movies again too, and if the end result is a new (GOOD) Superman movie, and/or a Batman movie, then let the movies keep coming out.

Personally, if I could see any comic book character made into a movie that's never been done before, I'd pick Green Lantern.

06-10-2003, 05:31 PM	#11
~~Leo656~~ Banned Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: nWo Country Posts: 27,703	Tokka: Yes, it really does seem a little too heavy on the CGI effects, and that bothers me a little bit, but I've heard the story is really good and that to me is more important than the special effects. I'm looking forward to it. But I do agree with you at least in part about the CGI, I hope it looks better in the actual movie than it does in the trailers. Too many movies rely on CGI nowadays, I miss when directors actually had to create special effects instead of just having people push buttons on a keyboard. Matthew: Yea, it sure seems that way doesn't it? It all started with Blade... when Blade made money, Marvel finally went ahead with a lot of their long-planned movie projects like X-Men and Spider-Man. Now that the money is rolling in, they're apparently gonna bring some of their other long-awaited movies to life. I know Hulk and Fantastic Four have been in various stages of planning for at least ten years. Fantastic Four was actually completed back in 1993 or so, but it was shelved on the grounds that it was... well... terrible. Iron Man... I will probably see it, but I'm not much of an Iron Man fan. This one seems like a "cash in on the Marvel Movie Craze" decision, since I haven't heard anything about it since recently. Same goes for Ghost Rider and Punisher. Wasn't that Dolph Lundren movie enough? LoL I think they just wanna make up for the fact that they didn't put the skull on his shirt the first time around. The one good thing about all this is it has DC interested in making movies again too, and if the end result is a new (GOOD) Superman movie, and/or a Batman movie, then let the movies keep coming out. Personally, if I could see any comic book character made into a movie that's never been done before, I'd pick Green Lantern.