![]() |
|
|
#36 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
That's why I said there should be some different circumstances when there IS some reasonable doubt. In this case, there's not.
The more time passes and the further we get from the crime, the less horrific it will seem and the more what he did will seem "not as big a deal" to some people. The more easily they'll forget that it was totally premeditated and meticulously executed without remorse. The more easily some will be fooled into believing his bullsh*t "insane" defense. They'll let doubt creep in, and then sympathy, and then you can just go ahead and forget about justice. They'll figure 20 years with good behavior is penance enough, and one day he'll see daylight again. No. There is absolutely no reasonable doubt in this case and no reason to drag it out one second longer than necessary. |
|
|
|
|
|