![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: N64 vs. GC | |||
| Nintendo 64 |
|
8 | 34.78% |
| GameCube |
|
15 | 65.22% |
| Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,999
|
Nintendo 64 vs. Nintendo GameCube
So I had a discussion about Nintendo consoles in general earlier today. It started on the SNES, and ended up being about comparing both N64 and the NGC.
Both were pretty great consoles. The best domestic Nintendo consoles after the SNES, imo. But which one was better? Let's compare them, shall we? N64 - Had better Mario and Zelda games than the GC. Mario 64 is definitely better than Sunshine, even though the latter is still a good game. As for Zelda, N64 had Ocarina and MM. I'd take both of those over Wind Waker or Twillight Princess. - It was on the market when Rare was at the top of its game. Banjo-Kazooie, Banjo-Tooie, Conker's, Diddy Kong Racing, Blast Corps, Jetforce Gemini, etc. Nintendo GameCube didn't have the same luck. - Had the best Star Fox game; - Had the best Mario Party games; GameCube - Had the best F-Zero game of all time; - Had a better SSB game than the N64; - Had Metroid games, unlike the N64; - Had a better Mario Kart. 64 was fun as hell back in the 90s, but Double Dash is a better game and has aged better as well; - Had Eternal Darkness and also Resident Evil games(one of them an exclusive, I think) and an esclusive Metal Gear Solid game; - Had more RPGs. N64 didn't have a game like Tales of Symphonia, per example. GC aged better than the N64. Although the N64 means more to me nostalgia-wise. That being said, I'd rather play GC nowadays. It's a fairly underrated console and it was the least great domestic Nintendo console, imo. So what about you? |
|
|
|
|
|