The Technodrome Forums

Go Back   The Technodrome Forums > General Forums > General Discussion > TV and Movies

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-05-2017, 08:03 PM   #19
sdp
Detoxed Member
 
sdp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 11,222
Would any of you consider Riddick a movie franchise? It has 3 movies, an animated special, two highly regarded video games and an upcoming film that who knows when it'll release but it'll eventually come out. I know it has a small fan base but I personally love it and so does Vin Diesel which is why this became a movie franchise instead a one off horror-scifi movie.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew NDB View Post
*The Crow opinions*
The first movie has its "off parts" but overall you can overlook the parts that don't work but man edit/change a few parts and it'd easily be one of the best movies ever made.

City of Angels is terrible, it's a far less interesting remake of the first film except it's a sequel since it has the girl from the first team in a totally depressing role that makes the first movie worse off.

The other two sequels I can't remember much about them except that they both had interesting ideas that would've made great movies but the execution was so bad that it was all wasted potential.

I still need to see the TV series and apparently there was a planned Rob Zombie sequel set in the future that never happened, I would've loved that. There's been a remake planned for quite a while and I'm sure it'll come out one of these days but as much potential as the franchise has I think they'll mess it up again.


Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberCubed View Post
It's weird when we think of movies we also only think of the big name Hollywood franchises.
I mentioned in my post counting big hollywood movies it was alright but yeah tons of great indie and foreign films that came out during the period they just aren't huge franchises, closest one I can think of is Donnie Darko since it did end up getting mainstream success.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew NDB View Post
I wouldn't. And if it came out in '99 that means it filmed in '98.
It still came out in 99 and only became a hit once it hit DVD so basically the impact it had began in the 00's which is why it even got a sequel in 2003 which by then it was a household name. The impact was not done in the 90s so I consider it a 00's franchise but opinons will differ.
sdp is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.