|
03-02-2020, 11:05 PM
|
#21 | |
|
Emperor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,904
|
Quote:
 Think about how appealing that sentence is to the will-never-haves. Not the have-nots, mind you... the will-never-haves; which is a more accurate description of the deepest of the Bernie base. Being a have-not shouldn't be a social pejorative, by comparison with the reality of the will-never-haves. "Have nots" get sick of their situation and work, and elevate their families. I will never hold a negative candle against someone whose current state is a "have not". But the "will-never-haves"? Those are true Socialist sheep. The real question is what is it that's really keeping the will-never-haves" in that structure and how do we address it? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
for a republican president to come in and dismantle whatever he starts to put into play.
Threaded Mode