![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: The sewers.
Posts: 118
|
Texas
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...-to-sue-509244
Hours after justices issued their 5-4 decision early Thursday, top Republicans in Florida, Arkansas and South Dakota said they were examining how the law’s unique “private right of action” enforcement structure could be used for look-alike abortion bans in their own states. Dear Republican Men of the The Technodrome, Could you please explain to me how you can support a party that supports actions that are so clearly anti-women, so clearly designed to keep women "in their place" as this does? You talk about how terrible Democrats are. How awful Joe Biden is. That's fine. You certainly have that right (this is, after all, America). However, no one on the left, no Democrat supports a ban on abortions at six weeks (few women even know they're pregnant at six weeks!). So, yeah. I'm genuinely curious. It is "cool" to hate on Democrats because it allows you to ignore the fact that you support a political party that hates on women, on women's right to choose? If you could please explain this... what's the word I'm looking for here? I want to say "duplicity," but I'm not sure that's it. Explain how you can support a party that obviously harbors some sort of resentment, some type of hate, for half of it's citizens (women). I'm not... I just don't get it? I mean, maybe I *do* get it. I certainly *suspect* what might be behind it. But I don't know for sure. To quote the great Sherlock Holmes, "Data! Data! Data! I can't make bricks without clay." Please, kind sirs, give me some clay for my bricks. Explain yourself in a way that I, a dumb liberal (who believes in the Equal Rights Amendment, that women should be paid the same amount as men for doing the same job, that the choices of a women's body should be between her and her Doctor. The list goes on and on...) could easily understand. Thanks for your time, and your input. I really would like to understand. And right now, I just don't. |
|
|
|
|
|