The Technodrome Forums

Go Back   The Technodrome Forums > General Forums > General Discussion > TV and Movies

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-06-2007, 04:48 PM   #11
Spitfire
Writer • Director
 
Spitfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neutrino View Post
Yeah, spit. I've seen the second movie. I liked 3 more than one and two. Yes the emo dark paker was a bit lame, but they were trying to get their point across. They must appeal to a larger audience than just you. (young children)
Rami never cared about pleasing anyone he did what he wanted. That's why I respected him. I respect directors who don't let movie studios tell them what to do.

Why do so many people like 300? It has tons of action and no plot. That's the common movie now of days that everyone eats up. I expect Rami to deliver more then that. And he did, but I just didn't find it on par with #2. And if that young children comment is about me I got a few things I could say about that, and instead of jumping the gun and assuming it is I'll just say that a PG-13 movie shouldn't appeal to young children. The less children in the theater during any movie the better.

Quote:
Well, there are more action scenes to level out the drama, so yeah, I think you should give it a shot.
There's only more action because it's a half hour longer. I actually think #2 has more action in it or around the same. Though I more recently watched 2.1 which is a re-cut that has extended fight scenes*And their really cool actually*

Quote:
I could hardly stand 2. Way too many minor annoyances as well as the fact that they over-accentuated the drama.
What annoyed you, out of curiosity? And how was the drama any more over accentuated then this movies? This one was worse in that aspect I thought. Then again you said it has more action then drama and that just proves you fit into the stereotype above of people liking movies better when it's mindless entertainment.

Sorry if I'm a bit harsh but I look at movies as a form of art, and when I see bad art recognized more then good art simply because of who was involved in it I get a little aggressive.

Quote:
If you think of the Symbiote as the main villain and not Venom, then his apperance makes more sense and his screen time (or lack thereof) is justifed.
You know I didn't even think of it that way. I'll have that mind set next time I watch it, I might enjoy it more.
__________________
Check out my online portfolio
http://www.christopherpelletier.com/

Last edited by Spitfire; 05-06-2007 at 04:55 PM.
Spitfire is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.