Zack Snyder's Rebel Moon

[Andrew NDB]

Originally Posted by CyberCubed

Every time I see the title of this thread I think it's a Star Wars movie. Rebel Moon is literally a Star Wars title.

Because it was. This is just Snyder re-purposing his Star Wars pitch that was rejected.

[Andrew NDB]

Ugh... here's Snyder, again with the "I have a director' cut that's a COMPLETELY different movie!"

https://www.darkhorizons.com/rebel-m...ifferent-film/

[Sumac]

Originally Posted by Andrew NDB

Ugh... here's Snyder, again with the "I have a director' cut that's a COMPLETELY different movie!"

https://www.darkhorizons.com/rebel-m...ifferent-film/

Snyder looked at game developers and decided that he too can make "early access movies".
And release "complete version" later, for an additional money.

Retard.
Screw him.

If he, even without any deadlines or outside oversight, can't make a good movie on a first try, he doesn't deserve to "try again". He deserved to be mocked and probably learn how to make good movies. Or **** off from industry in general - world knows there are plenty of one bit hacks with a "vision" who can make slow-mo and gore look good on a screen, without pretending to be "deep philosophers".

[Barkworm]

Snyder has had his moments but he is an idiot.

[IMJ]

I feel like every Director has massive "ego stories" in play nowadays as some opus like they are Beethoven or Shakespeare or something. Even the dramatic naming of these projects gets on my nerves at this point - "Rebel Moon: Part 1 A Child of bla bla bla" just screams of "Creative ego bandwagoning".

Epic film making is awesome - once it's a proven and onboarded concept. Guy should have just made "Rebel Moon" a compelling and fun movie with hints of backstory and if it caught on you make part 2.

But no, he had to make "Rebel MOON!!! Part..... ONE! A Child of bla bla bla"

[Sumac]

Ambitions are great, but they need to be supported by a talent.
Snyder is a visionary and even then he is fairly limited, but that's about it.
He can't tell story at all, unless he works with pre-established script.

[Andrew NDB]

Originally Posted by IMJ

Even the dramatic naming of these projects gets on my nerves at this point - "Rebel Moon: Part 1 A Child of bla bla bla" just screams of "Creative ego bandwagoning".

Yeah, tell me about it.

[ZariusTwo]

Teaser for part two out already

[IMJ]

Sat through this in two sittings.

The irony is that it isn't even as remotely bad as everyone was making it out to be, yet all of my observations about it are somewhat critical and borderline negative. Go figure.

Overall just a very cliche movie. It seemed like a mashup between Star Wars, Firefly and any "Seven Samurai" movie that has ever come out. The slow motion action-scenes are used in cliche and unexciting moments and I imagine they would have played out better in real time.

I also could never tell what act we were in at any given moment and when she finally defeats the "evil General Guy" I actually thought I was only at a battle a quarter of the way through the movie rather than the finale.

Just very confused regarding what else to say. Not remotely as bad as people would have you believe, yet every bit as bad.

[TigerClaw]

I heard he has an R rated version of the movie, Which he said is a completely different movie then what the PG-13 is showing, That version will eventually get released.

This is something that been happening with Zack Snyder these days, He makes a movie, and at some point releases an R rated cut of it, Like what he did with Batman v Superman, and then Zack Snyder's Justice League.

[Sumac]

As I said before, Snyder - is the first director who mastered "art" of "early access movies".
Hopefully he will be the last.