![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,574
|
THAT'S what you got out of 4? I didn't get that at all from it. Like the Wachowski that did 4 said, it was just a different sort of movie about resurrecting "mom and dad," with not a whole lot of interest in getting back to the superheroics of 2 and 3. Not because there's any resentment for them, but just because that's a radically different story than what's going on in 4.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Detoxed Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 11,222
|
If you want me to expand then sure:
The movie acknowledges 2/3 happened, but reboots it as "well the machines are still doing what they want even if humans are technically free". So it kinda goes back to the ending of the first movie where the power dynamic of yeah you have the machines but at the same time humans now have power as well. The movie in general is a love story about Trinity and Neo and it worked really well for me while at the same time setting up a universe where they can make new movies after this one. Which clearly didn't happen since this one bombed so bad. But yeah, I liked it but I understand how the meta commentary of the first 40 minutes filtered pretty much everyone. That's another trend from the 2000s that should come back. Those weird Direct to video anime interquels of movies. Animatrix was great, Riddick got one of those as well, Batman Begins also had one. There's others I'm forgetting, Hellboy and some others. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,574
|
They're making Matrix 5 right now. Like I just said.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,895
|
Yeah the second Riddick movie really drew me in, and I bought (and I think I still have) that animated bridge-flick. But then as I saw the rest of them I realized that the 2nd Riddick flick was the odd-man-out and that I didn't really like the franchise all that much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,574
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 43,888
|
It's funny how many movie series were in their early installements in the early 2000's. Mission Impossible with Tom Cruise only had 3 movies by the early 2000's...can you believe that? Fast and Furious got their start back then and now have like 10+ movies, the Harry Potter movies just started, the James Bond movies with Daniel Craig had just begun, the MCU wouldn't even start till 2008 and we just had Spider-man and X-men basically. Batman Begins had come in 2005, the Star Wars prequels were still going, etc.
Man, feels like a lifetime ago. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|