![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Mad Scientist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Writer • Director
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,035
|
Ebert doesn't usually fail me but sometimes he tends to give a bad movie some praise or a movie I enjoyed a good slamming.
I don't base what I see or my opinions off reviews anymore, I simply go watch it and decide for myself. If it sucks at least I have a lesson in how not to make a film. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Foot Elite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,439
|
To me, he lost all his integrity when he gave a good review to Fast and the Furious, AND its sequal.
__________________
[Insert mildly amusing banner here] |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Mad Scientist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 122 and an eighth
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
As long as a reviewer gives good reasons for their opinion, I could care less what they say. If they didn't like a movie I loved or vice versa, it doesn't bother me. There are some instances, like Warhorse mentioned in The Ring, where they didn't understand the movie so couldn't give it a proper review. So in conclusion, **** em'. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|