![]() |
|
|
#341 |
|
Thug
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 64
|
I've got a problem with furries but that's because I am one.
Overall this place has a general pessimism but that's not unique. It's pretty much all over the internet. I'm excited to catch up and do my best to inject some positivity when I can. |
|
|
|
|
|
#342 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 11,087
|
... Would you describe Looney Tunes that way?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#343 |
|
Thug
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#344 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
If Lola Bunny is Wrong, then I don't wanna be Right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#345 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 11,087
|
To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure sure what qualifies as furry media. I get that it's not inherently sexual in nature but that seems to be a common association, and I can't say "Let's have the Turtles ****!" or at the very least making it fappable has never been a major aspect of the official TMNT material. I'm also not sure how much focus there needs to be on animal people, sure the Turtles themselves are animal people, but for most installments in the franchise the majority of the characters are humans or aliens (some of which may look like animal people but a lot of them don't), with the exception being the 2012 show, Rise and the current arc of IDW. Then if I'm not mistaken, one of the guidelines for Furry art is to make the characters look kind of cute, and while that may shift the original Laird/Eastman designs are hardly cute with the constant scowling and blank eyes.
I mean most of the new aliens in Star Trek Lower Decks are animal people and that show might have more of them than TMNT typically does, the designs of them are arguably pretty cute and there's even a little bit of sexual stuff with them involved (more than most of TMNT anyway). So does that mean Star Trek (or at least this iteration of it) is more " furry adjacent" than TMNT? Spoiler:
I would include a video/image of the Cat lady straight up saying she wants to **** the Bajoran but I can't find it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#346 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 43,881
|
With TMNT there used to be very few female mutants in the old days (I guess before the Nick/IDW era), with only a few like Mona Lisa or Ninjara but there weren't too many notable ones.
There's been more since IDW/Nick, but I guess I never saw TMNT as a furry franchise because most mutants were just either enemies or friends of the Turtles and relationships has never been a major part of the franchise before. |
|
|
|
|
|
#347 |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,558
|
That show doesn't count. It isn't real Trek.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#348 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 11,087
|
Setting the debate over wheter or not Lower Decks should be thought of as real Trek, because the question is still relevant to the show itself, is it "furry adjacent"?
It doesn't really have more animal people characters than most of TMNT. So does it count as "furry adjacent" if most of the characters are either human or aliens that look like humans with forehead cancer but they constantly run into animal people? |
|
|
|
|
|
#349 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
Sulu once banged M'ress in an officially licensed Trek comic, for whichever way that swings the ol' pendulum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#350 | |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 15,711
|
Quote:
__________________
"I was down with TMNT once, but then they changed what TMNT was. Now what I was down with is no longer TMNT and what TMNT now is seems weird and scary. And it'll happen to YOU." Check out my blog for Comic Reviews and other things. https://markepicblogofrandomness.blogspot.com/ I also started The AEW Crew, the All Elite Wrestling Fan Club! https://www.facebook.com/groups/637508120044168/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#351 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 11,087
|
Oh! Well, I guess in-universe that wouldn't be considered weirder than Sarek and Amanda or Torres' parents... Still, the purring should make it a bit awkward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#352 |
|
Annalist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,435
|
__________________
ALL THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED
|
|
|
|
|
|
#353 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
In Sulu's defense... if M'ress is Wrong then I don't wanna be Right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#354 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 11,087
|
I'm guessing Sulu likes hairy pussy then? M'Ress sure is one hairy pussycat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#355 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
"Oh myyyyyyyy" indeed. "I am a heterosexual! I LOVE vaginas!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#356 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 11,087
|
Well, Sulu was gay in the Abrams-verse. Did we ever get any official word on Sulu's sexuality in the canon main timeline? I know the Mirrorverse Sulu hit on Uhura, but DS9 pretty much confirmed that the Mirrorverse might as well be renamed the "Bisexual Nymphomaniac" universe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#357 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
I think that I read that Takei was a little annoyed about that bit in the Abrams-verse, and that he himself didn't ever play Sulu as "gay" specifically, he felt like that was just something they tacked on for the reboot because they assumed "Since George Takei was gay, so was his character by default". But I guess maybe that isn't true?
I know some gay actors and voice actors come right out and say, "All my characters I play are gay unless it's stated otherwise," but I'm sure that's not a blanket rule, people are individuals. Based on Takei's nonplussed reaction, if true, perhaps George Takei was gay but Sulu was straight. I mean, I was kinda just taking a chance to make a silly joke about the M'ress thing, but like many things, at the time it was published it WAS stated as being "totally canon, you guys". So in at least one universe, Sulu was either straight or bisexual. And also, a furry. ![]() I ain't mad. Must get lonely in space. Kirk had the right idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#358 |
|
Annalist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,435
|
Sulu had a daughter (Demora, as seen in Generations). So assumption was that he was hetero. (Until Takei came out, of course.)
__________________
ALL THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED
|
|
|
|
|
|
#359 |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,558
|
Which is dumb. Should Spock suddenly be a homosexual because Zachary Quinto came out?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#360 |
|
Mutant Tiger
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hialeah, Florida, USA
Posts: 14,165
|
I recall when Star Trek Beyond came out. The filmmakers wanted to make Sulu homosexual to honor George Takei. But he was against the idea because he always portrayed Sulu as Hetero.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| i_need_a_adult, panda cuck fan, sumac vs plastroncafe, toxicity |
|
|