New TMNT videogames for Gameboy Advance,Gamecube,PSX2 ZBOX!! - Page 2

*Deathknight* · 01-03-2003, 06:05 PM

3d can be good or bad depending on the game and the same goes with 2d. As long as the fighting works, I don't care which it is. The one game I couldn't stand was the Tomb Raider series. How in gods name you moved without walking into walls constantly is beyond me. There's an example of a 3d environment that just didn't work. A good 2d is the new contra. It all depends on how they use the 3d or 2d environment. Still, I'm a fan of classic games and no system will ever be better than NES or SNES!

*Stone Ill* · 01-03-2003, 06:11 PM

Sure there are systems better than them..But, I guess no other system can capture such memories as they did.

~~Reznorite420~~ · 01-03-2003, 06:46 PM

To clear things up:

I never said 3D was bad. If anything, I love 3D just as much as the next man. What upsets me is when people hate a game just because the graphics aren't in 3D. That's not the defining characteristic of game, ladies and gentlemen.

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-03-2003, 08:51 PM

I think my idea is the best, they would make a lot of money off of it too, because people are going to be getting back into tmnt shortly and younger or new kids want a taste of the original gaming, at least i think they do...
it would be a little something for all of us...

Peanut · 01-04-2003, 01:48 AM

The reason they could do that for sonic was because all the games were 2d and hardly took up any space on the disc. To put all the old games PLUS a new one PLUS extra unlockables...it just wouldn't work. Plus they would NEVER do it. If they came out with a new game they wouldn't give you all that extra stuff with it. Unless you were willing to pay $90-$100 for just the single game. If they were to do it they would make it 2 games. One for the new game and then one for the old game and unlockables with the latter being around $40 and the former being the normal game price.

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-04-2003, 11:46 AM

Yea, I am not saying they can do that all on one disc. They couldn't do it with Sonic either, as they only brought 3 of the good ones and the unlockables seem pretty cheap and they weren't all sonic related. They are probly going to make another disc with the rest of them, I hope...

I think they could have a really great selling revival pack if they put enough thought into the project...maybe they can put 2 discs in the one box and sell it like that, but then again they would have to edit the boxes a bit...

~~Reznorite420~~ · 01-04-2003, 01:20 PM

I say have a whole friggin' LINE of TMNT games: Make the new one for all systems, then perhaps release "vintage" re-releases of the older games separately for the GBA only...

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-04-2003, 01:56 PM

No one is going to buy each game seperately...plus, it is too expensive to sell an old game for 29.99

Zenrick · 01-04-2003, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tokka

No one is going to buy each game seperately...plus, it is too expensive to sell an old game for 29.99

I will buy them seperately

But only if they upgrade the sounds and make some new animations like they did for the Mario Bros. games.

Oh and the new Contra was 3D, not 2D for whoever said it was 2D. Its just sidescrolling.....but completely 3D. Pretty game.

~~Reznorite420~~ · 01-04-2003, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tokka

No one is going to buy each game seperately

I would

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tokka

...plus, it is too expensive to sell an old game for 29.99

Who said they had to sell it at THAT price?

*Stone Ill* · 01-04-2003, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michaelangelo

The reason they could do that for sonic was because all the games were 2d and hardly took up any space on the disc. To put all the old games PLUS a new one PLUS extra unlockables...it just wouldn't work. Plus they would NEVER do it. If they came out with a new game they wouldn't give you all that extra stuff with it. Unless you were willing to pay $90-$100 for just the single game. If they were to do it they would make it 2 games. One for the new game and then one for the old game and unlockables with the latter being around $40 and the former being the normal game price.

I've bought a lot of games around $90-$100...Hell, Grand Theft Auto: Vice City was $79.99...Jak and Daxter was $88.99 or something like that.

*Mr. Snackpants* · 01-04-2003, 08:25 PM

If you payed that much, you got ripped off

*Stone Ill* · 01-04-2003, 08:58 PM

No, because Vice City was what? $50 in America? Well, it was $79.99 in Canada..remember the different values between those countries?

**Ratking** · 01-05-2003, 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slash89

2D's freakin sucks 3D rules trust me 2d would look like crap and the fighting would look horrible

lol what a load of crap. How many classic 2D games has there been........i mean when u think about there has been quite a few. Mario, sonic, Mortal combat, Street fighter 2, and the other millions i cant think of now.

There is no way 2D games suck, just cause one may suck doesnt mean they all do.

Zenrick · 01-05-2003, 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ratking

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slash89

2D's freakin sucks 3D rules trust me 2d would look like crap and the fighting would look horrible

lol what a load of crap. How many classic 2D games has there been........i mean when u think about there has been quite a few. Mario, sonic, Mortal combat, Street fighter 2, and the other millions i cant think of now.

There is no way 2D games suck, just cause one may suck doesnt mean they all do.

Think with an open mind......I think he meant that any new attempts at a 2D game would suck......and I agree with that, 2D games that WERE made are so completely awesome for the memories they've given me and such, but not to see any improvement over the years would be depressing because we know that it would just be an attempt to stick with something that doesnt work with the times......its kinda like 80's butt-rock.....they had poofy ugly hair and it seemed to work at the time.......now they still have their long hair thinking its cool........but it way isnt cool at all.
My point.......things need change, and 2D is over and stuck in my memories (and on my computer with my millions of roms

) 3D is the standard.

(my opinion!!! Dont harass me over it!!!!

)

**Karpo_007** · 01-05-2003, 08:56 AM

Well License games Today are too often crap. But this is Konami, so We might have a positve suprise.

Peanut · 01-05-2003, 09:53 AM

Exactly Stone I was speaking of the games in american $ terms since most people here are American. I'm Canadian as well so I know how you feel. Anyways they could fit all the Sonic games on the disc they just didn't for whatever reason. They probably figured they could make more money on a Sonic Mega Collection 2.

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-05-2003, 01:45 PM

No, they actually couldn't fit all of the games on one disc, and when asked why the SonicTeam couldn't add Sonic CD and Sonic R, they said they didn't have that kind of space on one disc....I mean, there are already 12 games on it already, there are many other sonic games, so they will probly make a second mega collection, they better.

**Ratking** · 01-06-2003, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zenrick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ratking

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slash89

2D's freakin sucks 3D rules trust me 2d would look like crap and the fighting would look horrible

lol what a load of crap. How many classic 2D games has there been........i mean when u think about there has been quite a few. Mario, sonic, Mortal combat, Street fighter 2, and the other millions i cant think of now.

There is no way 2D games suck, just cause one may suck doesnt mean they all do.

Think with an open mind......I think he meant that any new attempts at a 2D game would suck......and I agree with that, 2D games that WERE made are so completely awesome for the memories they've given me and such, but not to see any improvement over the years would be depressing

because we know that it would just be an attempt to stick with something that doesnt work with the times......its kinda like 80's butt-rock.....they had poofy ugly hair and it seemed to work at the time.......now they still have their long hair thinking its cool........but it way isnt cool at all.

My point.......things need change, and 2D is over and stuck in my memories (and on my computer with my millions of roms

) 3D is the standard.

(my opinion!!! Dont harass me over it!!!!

)

lol well that was my opinion too and i felt harrassed lol

, hehe na, all i was, saying is that u cant say something is crap just because its old. There is thousands of things he COULD have meant.

I wouldnt say 2D is over... i mean what about starcraft and AOE 2 - u cant tell me they werent/are big?. Sure man i totally agree that 3d is better, yet i would class that any game attemp at 2d would be crap

.
I mean look at star wars force commander - that was a totally 3d game, yet it did nothing and was a flop, yet star wars battlegrounds with the 2d AOE engine is easily more popular.

~~Tokka-B~~ · 01-06-2003, 02:23 PM

only 3-d game I like is MK: DE

01-03-2003, 06:05 PM	#21
Deathknight Mad Scientist Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: One of the 972 rooms of the technodrome Posts: 1,995	3d can be good or bad depending on the game and the same goes with 2d. As long as the fighting works, I don't care which it is. The one game I couldn't stand was the Tomb Raider series. How in gods name you moved without walking into walls constantly is beyond me. There's an example of a 3d environment that just didn't work. A good 2d is the new contra. It all depends on how they use the 3d or 2d environment. Still, I'm a fan of classic games and no system will ever be better than NES or SNES! __________________ Shredder: "Ninja hall of fame? Ha! Where's MY statue?!" -My Brother, the Bad Guy

01-03-2003, 06:11 PM	#22
Stone Ill Mad Scientist Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Burlington, Ontario Posts: 2,397	Sure there are systems better than them..But, I guess no other system can capture such memories as they did.

01-03-2003, 06:46 PM	#23
~~Reznorite420~~ Banned Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 3,851	To clear things up: I never said 3D was bad. If anything, I love 3D just as much as the next man. What upsets me is when people hate a game just because the graphics aren't in 3D. That's not the defining characteristic of game, ladies and gentlemen.

01-03-2003, 08:51 PM	#24
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	I think my idea is the best, they would make a lot of money off of it too, because people are going to be getting back into tmnt shortly and younger or new kids want a taste of the original gaming, at least i think they do... it would be a little something for all of us...

01-04-2003, 01:48 AM	#25
Peanut Second Gear Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The New World Posts: 15,422	The reason they could do that for sonic was because all the games were 2d and hardly took up any space on the disc. To put all the old games PLUS a new one PLUS extra unlockables...it just wouldn't work. Plus they would NEVER do it. If they came out with a new game they wouldn't give you all that extra stuff with it. Unless you were willing to pay $90-$100 for just the single game. If they were to do it they would make it 2 games. One for the new game and then one for the old game and unlockables with the latter being around $40 and the former being the normal game price.

01-04-2003, 11:46 AM	#26
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	Yea, I am not saying they can do that all on one disc. They couldn't do it with Sonic either, as they only brought 3 of the good ones and the unlockables seem pretty cheap and they weren't all sonic related. They are probly going to make another disc with the rest of them, I hope... I think they could have a really great selling revival pack if they put enough thought into the project...maybe they can put 2 discs in the one box and sell it like that, but then again they would have to edit the boxes a bit...

01-04-2003, 01:20 PM	#27
~~Reznorite420~~ Banned Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 3,851	I say have a whole friggin' LINE of TMNT games: Make the new one for all systems, then perhaps release "vintage" re-releases of the older games separately for the GBA only...

01-04-2003, 01:56 PM	#28
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	No one is going to buy each game seperately...plus, it is too expensive to sell an old game for 29.99

01-04-2003, 08:25 PM	#32
Mr. Snackpants Keep cool my babies! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mount Pleasant Posts: 2,239	If you payed that much, you got ripped off

01-04-2003, 08:58 PM	#33
Stone Ill Mad Scientist Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Burlington, Ontario Posts: 2,397	No, because Vice City was what? $50 in America? Well, it was $79.99 in Canada..remember the different values between those countries?

01-05-2003, 08:56 AM	#36
Karpo_007 Inactive Moderator Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Finland Posts: 8,798	Well License games Today are too often crap. But this is Konami, so We might have a positve suprise.

01-05-2003, 09:53 AM	#37
Peanut Second Gear Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The New World Posts: 15,422	Exactly Stone I was speaking of the games in american $ terms since most people here are American. I'm Canadian as well so I know how you feel. Anyways they could fit all the Sonic games on the disc they just didn't for whatever reason. They probably figured they could make more money on a Sonic Mega Collection 2.

01-05-2003, 01:45 PM	#38
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	No, they actually couldn't fit all of the games on one disc, and when asked why the SonicTeam couldn't add Sonic CD and Sonic R, they said they didn't have that kind of space on one disc....I mean, there are already 12 games on it already, there are many other sonic games, so they will probly make a second mega collection, they better.

01-06-2003, 02:23 PM	#40
~~Tokka-B~~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The Lost Sewer Posts: 1,829	only 3-d game I like is MK: DE