Baxter Stockman Figure - Page 3

milweskee · 05-05-2004, 02:20 PM

Criticizing a product from Playmates is a good thing no matter how you want to look at it. If you don't like it you should definitely not buy it. Otherwise they're going to think we'll buy anything they put out there and they won't try anymore. Just like the video game. The name alone sells it, but if it sucks you shouldn't buy it. That way, the next one we get will be a lot better. Truth is, I'd rather not have a Stockman figure at all if that's what their giving us. And I don't think I'm alone there. What's the use? Playmates is not going to take the criticism personally. They need to know if their customers hate it for so many different reasons.

JaffleMan · 05-06-2004, 03:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikesPizzaShack

ya if i was a playmayes staff and surfed this forum and saw ppl hateing what baxter looked like from the pics, to me that would mean they well they hate it and its not gonna sell. so i would then go back and tell ppl that customers who saw the pics hated it and wont get a good responce. just ignoring the comments like u said u would only means that then u truley wouldnt care about customer satisfaction.

That's a fair enough comment and I fully respect that, but the difference is I was reffering to if ""I"" was part of Playmates staff. I agree with both of you that letting the company know that you both don't like the toy is a good idea but what the main partthat I was trying to argue is that people shouldn't be bagging Playmates directly such as the comment's like "PLAYMATES SUCKS" etc etc.

Trust me, compared to a "LOT" of other toy companies out there, Playmates is doing extraoardingly well and the company and staff deserve our appreciation.

**Jester** · 05-10-2004, 09:04 AM

i think playmates is doing a steller job so far with the TMNT line....but baxter misses the mark. i think they should just release a basic baxter with interchangable heads and a mini spider body sccessory. this fig is grossly toon in acurate...but if it comes down to having a baxter...i'd probably "shell" out the cash to get him...then make a custome outta him...maybe use the xtra limbs with nano who knows....hey maybe they should release a huge nano, like krang's android body in the old line....

05-10-2004, 09:04 AM	#43
Jester Rat-faced Dude-guy Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arkansas Posts: 26,300	i think playmates is doing a steller job so far with the TMNT line....but baxter misses the mark. i think they should just release a basic baxter with interchangable heads and a mini spider body sccessory. this fig is grossly toon in acurate...but if it comes down to having a baxter...i'd probably "shell" out the cash to get him...then make a custome outta him...maybe use the xtra limbs with nano who knows....hey maybe they should release a huge nano, like krang's android body in the old line.... __________________ "Clearly, you're Ninja Turtling incorrectly." - Leo656

05-05-2004, 02:20 PM	#41
milweskee Foot Soldier Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin Posts: 184	Criticizing a product from Playmates is a good thing no matter how you want to look at it. If you don't like it you should definitely not buy it. Otherwise they're going to think we'll buy anything they put out there and they won't try anymore. Just like the video game. The name alone sells it, but if it sucks you shouldn't buy it. That way, the next one we get will be a lot better. Truth is, I'd rather not have a Stockman figure at all if that's what their giving us. And I don't think I'm alone there. What's the use? Playmates is not going to take the criticism personally. They need to know if their customers hate it for so many different reasons.