Gay pride

[1987]

gay pride month is happening now, can’t overlook it when every major corporation has decorated their logos with rainbows. it used to be it’s own thing where most people just like “ahh whatever, let them have their parade” i really didn’t care about it, but now they are desperately trying to make it mainstream.

do you think it’s bigoted how it’s called gay pride month, instead of lgbtqia+ month, cause the term “gay” mainly focuses on cisgendered homosexual men, right? what about the other members of that community, lesbians, transgenders etc, shouldn’t they be represented?

however i think they are taking things a bit far this year, the left is trying to normalize “drag shows for kids” and schools are forcefully indoctrinating a lgbtqia+ woke agenda on their students wtf? for the .01%. how have times changed to this extremism? like they’re trying to force kids to be transgender, it’s sickening, nothing against transgenders, but they shouldn’t be forcing that ideology on kids, let them decide on their own. wow didn’t know the left was so hell bent on abolishing the nuclear family, it’s bigoted.

the left claims to be the party of love and diversity, stand with ukraine, they love their muslim neighbors etc. even though muslims hate gays, the left will quickly label you bigoted and islamaphobic if you speak out against the barbaric practices of the muslim taliban. but what happens when 2 woke ideologies collide?

[superstaff]

Originally Posted by 1987

gay pride month is happening now, can’t overlook it when every major corporation has decorated their logos with rainbows. it used to be it’s own thing where most people just like “ahh whatever, let them have their parade” i really didn’t care about it, but now they are desperately trying to make it mainstream.

It's been mainstream for the last few years already. In fact, I believe it was 2020 when it began to really, really ramp up in 'popularity' with lots of corporate grandstanding.

do you think it’s bigoted how it’s called gay pride month, instead of lgbtqia+ month, cause the term “gay” mainly focuses on cisgendered homosexual men, right? what about the other members of that community, lesbians, transgenders etc, shouldn’t they be represented?

You're right, and wrong. Sort of. A lot of it is exclusively gay (and lesbian, really) focused. A lot. Some places make an effort to include the rest of the community, though not often. Like I've said in other posts on here, I do see a lot of the gay/lesbian community turn their noses on the rest of the 'alphabet groups', and there's a lot of animosity between the groups in reality.

however i think they are taking things a bit far this year, the left is trying to normalize “drag shows for kids” and schools are forcefully indoctrinating a lgbtqia+ woke agenda on their students wtf? for the .01%. how have times changed to this extremism? like they’re trying to force kids to be transgender, it’s sickening, nothing against transgenders, but they shouldn’t be forcing that ideology on kids, let them decide on their own. wow didn’t know the left was so hell bent on abolishing the nuclear family, it’s bigoted.

I think there's a huge difference between educating children on homosexuality, and...'drag shows for kids'. I'll say this right now, I've never liked beauty pageants and the like, especially for children. Little girls being paraded around in very skimpy outfits, and being judged on their looks and weight is gross to me. I see drag shows being more or less the same, it's treating children like playthings and fashion accessories. In both instances, parents are using their kids as well, to show them off like purse poodles. It's just that in the case of these junior drag shows, there's an added component of parents also showing off how 'open minded' and 'accepting' they are. Trust me, my mother tried to turn me into a beauty queen as a kid, so I understood a lot of the 'psychology' behind this stuff. Luckily, I never got accepted into any beauty shows.

Anyway, back on topic. I may or may not be roasted for this here. Though I think banning all education and talk of homosexuality is excessive. Homosexuality and transgenderism and the like all exist. Most kids know they exist, even when parents try to hide it. I know mine did, and I still grew up knowing what gayness was, and am bi myself. Almost as if...trying to hide this stuff from people doesn't work. The healthy medium, of course, is to make it known that they exist, and lightly educate children on it little by little. No, I'm not saying we should teach kindergartners about different gay sex positions either. Obviously, as kids get older, the education on sex becomes more varied, and complicated.

I got most of my sex education in late elementary school (fifth grade) into middle school. It was exclusively heterosexual, and honestly, it was pretty trash. I don't have a very good opinion of the educational system, and I think most people in general are awful teachers, and even worse at teaching sex education of any kind. My experiences are probably weird because I became sexually active as a young teen, and a lot of my 'education' came from early 2000s internet. Even then, I went through a lot of unnecessary stress because I still didn't 'get' certain aspects of biological sex (aka I'd freak out over late periods and thought I somehow got pregnant even if I hadn't had actual sex). My religious parents, predictably, did jackshit to educate me either, and basically tried to paint all sex as deviant and evil (joke's on them, it didn't stick to me the way they wanted it to ). Anyway, a lot of people, even those involved in the LGBT+ community, don't 'get' it.

For instance, I think some kids do suffer from gender dysmorphia. I've witnessed firsthand from people I used to know that it can be crippling and depressing. But then there's kids that got through phases, and believe that preferring a Hot Wheels car to a Barbie makes them trans. In high school, I knew a kid that cycled through phases: he thought he was gay, then he thought he was bi, then he thought he was straight, then he was gay again, etc. We all, him included, would joke about it. "Are you gay or bi this week?" I'd ask him, and he'd go, "Hm...bi? I think?" I feel like...the way things are now, people expect kids who are questioning themselves and their bodies/sexuality to conform to a label IMMEDIATELY AND FOREVER. Thus, to many in the LGBT+ community, a child questioning whether they are trans or not prompts them to immediately pressure that child into conforming to being trans.

It's really not different from other groups. I remember the pressure in church for everyone there to be Christian and become Baptized. As a child, the other churchgoers actually tried to force me to get Baptized. There were a lot of reasons I refused, though they were wholly unsympathetic to it. If I came to church, I needed to be like the rest of them, and get Baptized. The pressure was tough on me. I didn't get Baptized in the end, though I know others who would give in, and do it so they could be considered a part of the group.

the left claims to be the party of love and diversity, stand with ukraine, they love their muslim neighbors etc. even though muslims hate gays, the left will quickly label you bigoted and islamaphobic if you speak out against the barbaric practices of the muslim taliban. but what happens when 2 woke ideologies collide?

https://i.imgur.com/DTLYhTp.jpg?2

I mean.

The right also claims to be the party of love and acceptance. I've had conservatives tell me I deserve to burn in hell for being a 'SJW', bi, being a minority, not being religious, etc. I honestly hate both sides, and their hypocrisy is both hilarious, and sad. Humanity is going down a really dark path right now, and the political discord is going to screw us all over in the end.

To specifically address your hypothetical about Muslims and homophobia, and how the left react to it? I've seen them mostly deflect that notion because, yes, it is contradictory. Thing is, they don't care, and they don't really ponder those notions too deeply. Many of the followers of leftist ideology just follow what they're told by their political overlords. Same with the right, honestly. If you really look into both political ideologies with a magnifying glass, you'll soon discover there's a lot of contradictions in beliefs they follow.

Anyway, going back to the main topic... I don't mind the idea of having themed months like black history month, and the like. It would be a nice opportunity, especially for kids, to learn more about other cultures, and the accomplishments of people within those groups. That's not what these months are for nowadays, and the corporatization and politicization of it all makes it very obvious what the real motive behind it is.

[1987]

Originally Posted by superstaff

I think there's a huge difference between educating children on homosexuality, and...'drag shows for kids'. I'll say this right now, I've never liked beauty pageants and the like, especially for children. Little girls being paraded around in very skimpy outfits, and being judged on their looks and weight is gross to me. I see drag shows being more or less the same, it's treating children like playthings and fashion accessories. In both instances, parents are using their kids as well, to show them off like purse poodles. It's just that in the case of these junior drag shows, there's an added component of parents also showing off how 'open minded' and 'accepting' they are. Trust me, my mother tried to turn me into a beauty queen as a kid, so I understood a lot of the 'psychology' behind this stuff. Luckily, I never got accepted into any beauty shows.

it just seems so forced these days, ever since biden took office and appointed that transgendered health secretary, we been flooded with excessive amounts of lgbtqia+ propaganda and virtue signaling. im sure some of that community also doesn’t want so much attention drawn to them. it seems they just want to encourage more gay/lesbian to adopt and become parents, like modern family. if a child gets adopted by a lgbtqia+ couple then i would imagine they will probably grow up into a similar lifestyle? we’ve been seeing the whole “theybies” saga evolve.

Originally Posted by superstaff

For instance, I think some kids do suffer from gender dysmorphia. I've witnessed firsthand from people I used to know that it can be crippling and depressing. But then there's kids that got through phases, and believe that preferring a Hot Wheels car to a Barbie makes them trans. In high school, I knew a kid that cycled through phases: he thought he was gay, then he thought he was bi, then he thought he was straight, then he was gay again, etc. We all, him included, would joke about it. "Are you gay or bi this week?" I'd ask him, and he'd go, "Hm...bi? I think?" I feel like...the way things are now, people expect kids who are questioning themselves and their bodies/sexuality to conform to a label IMMEDIATELY AND FOREVER. Thus, to many in the LGBT+ community, a child questioning whether they are trans or not prompts them to immediately pressure that child into conforming to being trans.

i’ve always felt they should just be left alone and figure out their own sexual orientation or gender identity whatever and live their own life vs being indoctrinated. that’s how it’s always been but there’s just too much propaganda and manipulation being forced now, most people get sick of it after a while, and if a kid just so happens to be adopted by an lgbtqia+ couple, well, that’s just their fate i guess.

Originally Posted by superstaff

To specifically address your hypothetical about Muslims and homophobia, and how the left react to it? I've seen them mostly deflect that notion because, yes, it is contradictory. Thing is, they don't care, and they don't really ponder those notions too deeply. Many of the followers of leftist ideology just follow what they're told by their political overlords. Same with the right, honestly. If you really look into both political ideologies with a magnifying glass, you'll soon discover there's a lot of contradictions in beliefs they follow.

that is true because obama is pro muslim, anti christianity and he is idolized by the left. most leftist that tolerate the bigotry from islam and bow down to them, are complete opposite toward “the patriarchy” as they call it, cry white supremacy, and their goal seems to be to abolish the nuclear family in america.

the leftist may stand with ukraine but little do they realize ukraine does not recognize same-sex marriage.

[superstaff]

Originally Posted by 1987

it just seems so forced these days, ever since biden took office and appointed that transgendered health secretary, we been flooded with excessive amounts of lgbtqia+ propaganda and virtue signaling.

This has been happening way before Biden. This happened during and before Trump was in office too.

im sure some of that community also doesn’t want so much attention drawn to them. it seems they just want to encourage more gay/lesbian to adopt and become parents, like modern family. if a child gets adopted by a lgbtqia+ couple then i would imagine they will probably grow up into a similar lifestyle? we’ve been seeing the whole “theybies” saga evolve.

That's really not true... A lot of people don't grow up to be clones of their parents. I didn't. Being raised by gay parents doesn't mean the kid(s) will be gay either. And there's straight parents that have 'theybies', in fact, I see more hetero couples with theybies than not.

i’ve always felt they should just be left alone and figure out their own sexual orientation or gender identity whatever and live their own life vs being indoctrinated. that’s how it’s always been but there’s just too much propaganda and manipulation being forced now, most people get sick of it after a while, and if a kid just so happens to be adopted by an lgbtqia+ couple, well, that’s just their fate i guess.

Propaganda and manipulation exist everywhere, if people can't see past the stuff fed to them by their families, schools, churches, whatever, and form their own opinions then...that's on them, and they'll have to live with the decisions they make subsequently. Like I said in my previous comment, most people seem to do anything so they can fit in with their group. This applies to any organized group.

that is true because obama is pro muslim, anti christianity and he is idolized by the left. most leftist that tolerate the bigotry from islam and bow down to them, are complete opposite toward “the patriarchy” as they call it, cry white supremacy, and their goal seems to be to abolish the nuclear family in america.

The agenda is to divide as many people as possible, and the goal is for the government to step in, and enact a means to control the populace through taxation and making many laws under the cloak of 'safety'. This is also not only happening in the US. However, the 'nuclear family' has been gone for decades now, and gay people aren't the reason why it's been destroyed. There are many reasons for this as well. Most families have been, and still are a f*cked up mess. I don't think I've met a single person who has had a perfect family life (aka husband + wife, happy marriage, '2.5 kids', etc), ever.

[IndigoErth]

Originally Posted by 1987

if a child gets adopted by a lgbtqia+ couple then i would imagine they will probably grow up into a similar lifestyle?

If that's the way humans biologically work, then explain all the gay people who were born from and raised by typical, run of the mill straight parents over the decades and centuries, including long before gayness was a public topic.

i’ve always felt they should just be left alone and figure out their own sexual orientation or gender identity whatever and live their own life

So make sure all the straight kids live in an indoctrinated safety bubble where only straighness exists, any other orientation is viewed as nonexistent, and go back to cruel times when kids who realize they aren't straight have to try to be invisible about it and be on their guard to not accidentally reveal themselves, else the sheltered and entitled straight kids, who aren't exposed to diversity and the concept of tolerance among peers, will behave toward non-straight non-cis peers in reprehensible ways.


Remember Matthew Shepard? Is that what you want for kids today via making them exist in the shadows? Because it's that kind of reason why straight people needed exposure to harmless but "different" aspects of some people so they don't go around mistreating, abusing, and sometimes killing them. Insist that kids should but kept in a safe space hetero-only bubble of life knowledge and that mistreatment and ostracization of peers is what you're only going to get more of.



My personal feeling on pride month, etc... Eh? More power to 'em, I'm more or less different. It's not my fight, but don't stand in anyone's way of civil and social issues they face and may need to see improvement on. Their existence and wanting and needing inclusion in society like anyone else doesn't scare me or make me insecure. Them being who they are is not going to somehow makes kids any different than who they themselves are 'intended' to be in life, it doesn't work that way. Gayness (etc) is no more pornographic or scandalous or inappropriate in public unless someone is making it so. Don't feel any of it needs to be pushed and specifically taught, but if kids see a gay couple and have questions, or even questions about their own feelings they think are "different" than their peers, then I see no problem in the proper adult discussing things with them at an age appropriate level.

[superstaff]

Originally Posted by IndigoErth

Remember Matthew Shepard? Is that what you want for kids today via making them exist in the shadows? Because it's that kind of reason why straight people needed exposure to harmless but "different" aspects of some people so they don't go around mistreating, abusing, and sometimes killing them. Insist that kids should but kept in a safe space hetero-only bubble of life knowledge and that mistreatment and ostracization of peers is what you're only going to get more of.

I think there's definitely a happy medium between sheltering children to the point of pretending homosexuality and transgenderism don't exist, and teaching kindergarteners about drag queens, hormone therapy and elective surgery...

Problem is, both sides are so radicalized and unwilling to compromise that they only see two options: a) hide it all away from the children and teens forever, or b) teach small children everything about LGBT+, including subjects they couldn't comprehend at a young age. A happy medium doesn't exist to many people.

[IndigoErth]

Originally Posted by superstaff

and teaching kindergarteners about drag queens, hormone therapy and elective surgery...

I read people going on about this stuff, but I've yet to actually see info on where that has actually happened. (Links anyone? That aren't hysterical conspiracy sources.)

I know a kindergartner. (Okay he just passed kindergarten this week.) Trying to get this kid to listen and pay attention to anything he's being told at this age is near impossible, let alone topics that would be way over his young brain to grasp what the words even mean to begin with. Age appropriate issue aside, it sounds like a waste of time to get this age to listen to anything beyond what actually interests them anyhow, let alone teachers trying to impart the beginnings of learning. (Ghosts, monsters, Minecraft, Plants Vs. Zombies... you'd likely get his attention with those, but he'll barge in and want to do all the talking. Anything else, forget it.)

I think he knows that some men and women love people of their own gender, and that's fine, but he's still struggling with grasping the beginnings of reading and those life basics, so I really think more personal matters of the world around him have plenty of time to come later.

Locally, the only drag queen stuff I've heard of as far as kids are concerned is some kind of story time thing at a library. I don't really have an issue with that. It isn't teaching them about drag queens or any orientation, they're just reading normal storybooks, and if they're all dolled up then honestly, young kids may not really see much difference between the drag queens and, say, other costumed characters at Disney or whatnot, since it is more or less a character they preform. And those who have a problem with it can simply skip that kind of library event.

[Leo656]

I do have some questions about how kids raised in a "gay bubble" (for lack of a better term) turn out, statistically.

While it's 100% true that not everyone grows up to be a mirror reflection of the environment they were raised in, at the same time this is the first time in recorded human history where we have "out and proud" homosexuals raising children openly and I can't help but wonder what kind of effect that has. Like, not for nothing, but I do know a few gay people who are especially spiteful towards "the straights" - which is a bit understandable, don't get me wrong - and while these specific individuals don't have kids, it's pretty clear to me that if they did have kids and those kids turned out straight, they'd be just as aghast and disappointed as a typical conservative Christian whose kids turn out gay. Same thing from the other direction. MANY parents do their level best to turn their kids into smaller versions of themselves, and they do it on multiple levels.

So like... can we prove that at least some of these gay parents aren't "nudging" their kids along on their preferred path? I mean, it's a variable.

[superstaff]

Originally Posted by Leo656

I do have some questions about how kids raised in a "gay bubble" (for lack of a better term) turn out, statistically.

Problem with using statistics nowadays is that they are super skewed in whatever direction the scientists gathering the data want it to go. So the pro-gay stats will say stuff like "89% of kids raised in gay households are now successful and happy, well adjusted citizens". The anti-gay stats will say stuff like "89% of kids raised in gay households are now neurotic, depressed, homicidal criminals". I've seen both online. It's hard to really, truly gauge it with actual cold, hard facts.

So like... can we prove that at least some of these gay parents aren't "nudging" their kids along on their preferred path? I mean, it's a variable.

I ain't gonna lie here. I'm sure parents like that exist. Because many parents are just bad, and narcissistic...therefore, they are the types who are trying to create Mini Mes of themselves. Believe me, that was how I was raised. My mother wanted a perfect angel that looked and acted like her, she would even lament this to me (and still does now). I think in my specific case, I was somehow a very stubborn, pigheaded child that would disobey when situations became uncomfortable for me.

Like I said above, I had those adults and kids in my former church trying to pressure me into a Baptism as well. It was actually pretty intimidating because they'd be like, "If you don't get Baptized, you might go to hell, sweetie!" They'd say that sort of thing through these Stepford Smiles of theirs, and even kid me could tell it was...creepy. But I just rejected it anyhow. Sadly, most people conform because, well, it's how they get approval from their peers. As you could tell, not conforming came with a huge price for me. I'm not exactly a super beloved person with a close network of friends and family.

Anyway, thing is, bad parents like that come in all shapes and sizes. There are likely gay parents who try to push their kids towards that lifestyle, sure. There are other types of parents who also try to push their kids into all sorts of stuff that they deem for their 'own good' as well. It sucks, but at the very end of the day, people need to say "Stop" if their parents or whoever are trying to muck up their lives and they don't want that. In my experience, that's easier said than done, because most people want to please others around them including their own parents. Thing is, what can be done? I don't think, short of having the government step in (I highly advise against people telling the government to tell them how to raise kids...I really, truly do) with crap like tests or whatever (let me reiterate, never give the government that kind of power ), there's not much else people can do. We're at the mercy of our environments, and how we are raised, though we also possess free will... It's just a very complicated situation with no easy answers.

[Leo656]

Originally Posted by 1987

however i think they are taking things a bit far this year, the left is trying to normalize “drag shows for kids” and schools are forcefully indoctrinating a lgbtqia+ woke agenda on their students wtf?

I have no problem with gay people but it blows my mind how anyone can't see that This Stuff Here is way, way, way too far.

I mean we're pumping out high school graduates who can barely read or write, but it's like SUPER important that we teach 4-year olds about drag queens, hormone therapy and elective surgery, you guys.

[ChosenOne]

The left is a snake eating its own tail. Change my mind.

[Dpooly84]

Sumac is a legend! Way to expose the nazi child molesting left.

[Cowabung-Gal]

https://nypost.com/2023/06/25/drag-q...rt-gay-rights/

If you want to keep LGBTQ support from declining any further, you probably shouldn’t do stuff like this. Just saying.

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status...CwkZmTj7guAAAA

(Those Antifa guys look more like terrorists than the Muslim protestors )

https://twitter.com/GAG_NewYork/stat...Cw0eGShrguAAAA

https://twitter.com/midwesthomo77/st...Cz7afq9bcuAAAA

[ChosenOne]

Not a joke: LGBTs don't reproduce, which is pretty much the same as being sterile, and if they had their way everyone would be in their camp and therefore humans would go extinct in a matter of decades. Who knows if that's their endgame, or even if they have one besides being obnoxious, but it's for sure more of a possibility now than ever before.

[Sumac]

Originally Posted by ChosenOne

Not a joke: LGBTs don't reproduce, which is pretty much the same as being sterile, and if they had their way everyone would be in their camp and therefore humans would go extinct in a matter of decades.

Sounds like a conspiracy ******** and I don't believe in conspiracies.
Besides, even most delusional of those mentally ill people understand that they are more straight people than LGBBQs, even if counting various non-binary triple headed otherkin helicopters as part of their movement.

Their attempts to pretend that LGBBQs can be a separate culture akin to that of cultures of different countries and races are cute and highlight how dumb their whole gimmick is.

Originally Posted by Mayhem

Nope, for all the "trans are bad" and "people in drag are bad" useless rhetoric around here, let's examine the fact that the two other groups I mention are far more "dangerous" in that capacity towards children, based on the news reports and convictions.

You are keep saying that, as if some of the DemRATS were not pedos. But I guess, your hatred dumbs you down, eh?

Also, once again, difference between trans and priests and "le ebil republicanz" is that trans is a group specifically founded around fetish and mental illness. It is a group, which routinely gaslights whole population into accepting them and their perversions as normal. And most people looking at those freakshows would figure that those people don't belong anywhere near children.

[ChosenOne]

Originally Posted by Sumac

Sounds like a conspiracy ******** and I don't believe in conspiracies.
Besides, even most delusional of those mentally ill people understand that they are more straight people than LGBBQs, even if counting various non-binary triple headed otherkin helicopters as part of their movement.

How in hell is it a conspiracy? Who said anything about a conspiracy? Why do you see conspiracies everywhere? Yeesh.

Men x men or women x women cannot reproduce. Period. Now, you may have noticed the Alphabet Agenda doesn't give a rat's *ss about straight people, and in fact sees them as inferior. Something to be "educated" and overwhelmed with propaganda replaced. They're not tolerant at all.

So if they had their way - and fortunately this is the unlikely part but still not impossible by any means - and more and more people, until eventually everyone, joined their ranks... Who would be left to replenish the population as it naturally dies out?

See? Just a bit of abstract thinking taken to its logical conclusion. Not hard at all.

Originally Posted by Mayhem

And I'll give you exhibit A, Oscar Wilde, and every other gay man that's had a beard over the centuries.

Over the centuries, yes. But beards aren't really a necessity anymore, are they?

[Sumac]

Originally Posted by Andrew NDB

I'm skeptical of a conspiracy as well BUT it is interesting that the same people pushing "Pride Progress" are generally people who feel a guilt that people are killing the planet and the different animal species and are raising the temperature, and boy, wouldn't the planet be so much better off if we weren't here or if there was at least a lot less of us, etc..

They are not connected. Not directly at least.
Its just happens that those people support basically everything "anti-establishment" or whatever passes in their wooden heads as "anti-mainstream".

And let me tell you - all those LGBBBQ* would not like the planet to die out. Most of them are mentally ill fetishists who ENJOY attention. Naturally they don't want anyone to die out, they NEED an audience so the whole world could see how GREAT and UNDERAPPRECIATED they are. Without audience they are basically nothing - just boring psychos.

The whole modern LGBBQ- thing is about getting attention and power through it. It is not about "rights", not about fighting Homophobia and whatnot. It is solely about attention and money. Which is why it can be said that LGB movement has been been betrayed from the inside and diffused into complete opposite of what it once meant to be.

Originally Posted by ChosenOne

So if they had their way - and fortunately this is the unlikely part but still not impossible by any means - and more and more people, until eventually everyone, joined their ranks... Who would be left to replenish the population as it naturally dies out?

Hm...

Originally Posted by ChosenOne

How in hell is it a conspiracy? Who said anything about a conspiracy? Why do you see conspiracies everywhere? Yeesh.

Your abstract thinking sounds like a paranoia and there is nothing logical about it.
Its just a typical boring fear-mongering typical for Homophobes and not very different from SJW screaming about "le ebil nazis" waiting to kill them behind every corner.

Originally Posted by TurtleManiac

Society has collapsed.

And more fear-mongering. Boring.

Originally Posted by TurtleManiac

If there were no conspiracies that would mean everything reported by the mainstream news media is 100% true and accurate information.

You do understand that news never have been accurate?
No report is 100% objective, since there are all go from people with various agendas. I don't know what news you are consuming, but I am sure as heck, most of them are subjective to one degree or the other.

Originally Posted by TurtleManiac

Right, if the whole world was gay, wouldn’t all of humanity eventually just die off? I know pretty far fetched but all this LBGTQ+ propaganda in your face everywhere all year round kinda makes you wonder.

They keep moving the goal posts further too, gay is old news, now the trendy popular thing is transgenderism. Even got their own flags up at the White House.

Because, they want more power and attention. Maybe even more attention.
It is not about political goals - it is about throwing a tantrum and getting headpats.

[CyberCubed]

I haven't posted here, but to me I really don't mind how people live their lives, or anyones personal lifestyle (obviously it doesn't affect me in any way). As long as gay people aren't bothering anyone else, it doesn't really matter. I have no problem with gay and lesbian couples, let them love who they want as long as everyone is above 18 years old and it's consenting.

[ChosenOne]

Originally Posted by Sumac

Your abstract thinking (...) there is nothing logical about it.

Yes. That's... Uh, that's what abstract thinking means...

Originally Posted by Sumac

Its just a typical boring fear-mongering typical for Homophobes (...)

I'm bi. Care to try again?

[Mayhem]

Originally Posted by ChosenOne

Over the centuries, yes. But beards aren't really a necessity anymore, are they?

No, but still happens, that’s for sure.