The Apollo Moon Missions Were Faked in a Studio - Page 6

*ZariusTwo* · 12-20-2014, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BubblyShell22

Ah, okay. I always thought there was wind in space.

Watching Power Rangers will convince you of that.

~~Drifty~~ · 12-20-2014, 12:05 PM

Quote:

PS. I've seen the landing sites and flags and footprints through a telescope. Unless you figure out how all that and the footprints got there without man, let me know. Until then, Occam's Razor.

Not even the Hubble can see with enough resolution to be able to make out something the size of the Apollo landing sites.
http://hubblesite.org/reference_desk...t=topten&id=77

Please tell us which telescope you used.

Also, tell us what you think of this.
http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm

More here...
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487

*Candy Kappa* · 12-20-2014, 12:07 PM

Are you the guy who have the picture of the "C" stone?

*Katie* · 12-20-2014, 01:37 PM

It's not hard to find an observatory which has time to view the LRO. Also helps that I live in a NASA town.

Tha paralaxis stuff doesn't convince me.

~~Leo656~~ · 12-20-2014, 01:40 PM

I can't remember what they said but Mythbusters also explained the flag moving thing.

Also, who is "us"? Are you presenting this thread to someone else as part of some kind of sociology study or something? I'm still trying to figure out exactly WTF it is you're doing here besides stirring sh*t.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZariusTwo

Watching Power Rangers will convince you of that.

So will that piece of sh*t Superman IV movie you love so much.

J/K. YOU MY BOY, BLUE!

*snake* · 12-20-2014, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leo656

I can't remember what they said but Mythbusters also explained the flag moving thing.

Also, who is "us"? Are you presenting this thread to someone else as part of some kind of sociology study or something? I'm still trying to figure out exactly WTF it is you're doing here besides stirring sh*t.

So will that piece of sh*t Superman IV movie you love so much.

J/K. YOU MY BOY, BLUE!

I really need to watch that Mythbusters episode. It sounds awesome.

*Katie* · 12-20-2014, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leo656

I can't remember what they said but Mythbusters also explained the flag moving thing.

Also, who is "us"? Are you presenting this thread to someone else as part of some kind of sociology study or something? I'm still trying to figure out exactly WTF it is you're doing here besides stirring sh*t.

So will that piece of sh*t Superman IV movie you love so much.

J/K. YOU MY BOY, BLUE!

He's using us as in him and the rest of the drome. As if you all buy this and I'm defending something no one else believes

~~Leo656~~ · 12-20-2014, 01:45 PM

I wasn't sure if it was just that or if he was showing all this to someone else or something.

~~Drifty~~ · 12-20-2014, 01:49 PM

Quote:

I can't remember what they said but Mythbusters also explained the flag moving thing.

MythBusters was discredited a long time ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7yc2rVOs00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5ajIVmGiQE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23BIb_PMJ4M
http://aulis.com/mythbusters.htm

Here's the MythBusters video you mentioned.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMBCfuKs9i8

The first video on the above list exposes it as lame sophistry.

*ZariusTwo* · 12-20-2014, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leo656

So will that piece of sh*t Superman IV movie you love so much.

J/K. YOU MY BOY, BLUE!

...You have my voice...

"NO, YOU HAVE MY VOICE"

~~Leo656~~ · 12-20-2014, 03:09 PM

Not gonna lie, I loved that part.

*TheCanadiandrome* · 12-20-2014, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZariusTwo

Watching Power Rangers will convince you of that.

bwahahaha!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leo656

So will that piece of sh*t Superman IV movie you love so much.

J/K. YOU MY BOY, BLUE!

haha yes

*BubblyShell22* · 12-20-2014, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZariusTwo

Watching Power Rangers will convince you of that.

I always hated Power Rangers and called it Potty Trainers instead. My brother used to watch it though.

*MsMarvelDuckie* · 12-20-2014, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BubblyShell22

Ah, okay. I always thought there was wind in space. My bad.

Technically, you're not wrong. There IS solar wind, but that is really more like radiation. Still, it's "wind"! And it does affect objects in space, too.

*Mayhem* · 12-21-2014, 06:38 AM

Simplest explanation for the differences in flag movement is... the Mythbusters guys (and gal) used a lot more force in their experiment than was actually needed on the moon. The flag calms down eventually because of the resistance applied against the flag pole and holder itself.

As for the flag moving at 2:37 when the astronaut moves past, I'm pretty certain he touched it ever so slightly with the left side of his suit or arm. But you'll never have a camera angle or better quality footage to prove otherwise.

~~Drifty~~ · 12-21-2014, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Simplest explanation for the differences in flag movement is... the Mythbusters guys (and gal) used a lot more force in their experiment than was actually needed on the moon. The flag calms down eventually because of the resistance applied against the flag pole and holder itself.

Compare the flag movement at the 00:50 and 1:50 time marks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7yc2rVOs00

At the 1:50 time mark the movement of the support rod shows how the astronaut is turning the pole. The astronout is obviously not moving the pole in a way that slows the flag down. The flag slows down the same way it does in air in the MythBusters experiment. Their experiment was an attempt at obfuscation by people who knew the moon missions had been faked in a studio.

Quote:

As for the flag moving at 2:37 when the astronaut moves past, I'm pretty certain he touched it ever so slightly with the left side of his suit or arm. But you'll never have a camera angle or better quality footage to prove otherwise.

This video shows that the flag started moving before he got close enough to touch it.

Initial Apollo 15 Flag Movement
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW9qcL4LiUg

The flag movement is one hundred percent consistent with its being in atmosphere.

Here's something else.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jYLRglPxYo

Look how the guy from MythBusters avoids actually discussing the issue. It seems that he doesn't even want the audience to see what's being pointed out. He's behaving like a cornered sophist.

*Katie* · 12-21-2014, 10:47 AM

Jarrah is an idiot.

Not sure why you worship him so much. Looks like Grant was trying real hard not to tell him what an idiot he is. He used to be a part of this board....for actual TMNT talk.

Physics in a vacuum explains the movement. The flag pole was touched. Action / reaction explains the movement until all the kinetic energy wears out, then the flag remains static, which it would not in an atmosphere considering all the movement around it.

Occam's Razor, dude, Occam's Razor.

Peanut · 12-21-2014, 01:09 PM

Wait...he's linking Jarrah sh*t? There's no way this isn't Jarrah.

*MsMarvelDuckie* · 12-21-2014, 01:47 PM

This brings up a nice little side-note- a Late Renaissance Italian motto of unknown attribution- Se non è vero, è ben trovato ("Even if it is not true, it is well conceived") when referred to a particularly artful explanation. The "fake" lunar landing theory certainly falls under this category.

~~Drifty~~ · 12-21-2014, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Physics in a vacuum explains the movement. The flag pole was touched. Action / reaction explains the movement until all the kinetic energy wears out, then the flag remains static, which it would not in an atmosphere considering all the movement around it.

I showed that the movement in this video...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gn6MTrin5eU
(2:35 time mark)

...started before he got close enough to touch it with these two videos.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFMpmjEv9o0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW9qcL4LiUg

Just saying that it was touched doesn't debunk what those videos show. Tell us why those two videos don't show that the flag had already started moving before he got close enough to touch it.

You've also got these two to explain.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7yc2rVOs00
(00:50 and 1:50 time marks)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgUncG26MMA
(18:50 time mark)

12-20-2014, 12:07 PM	#103
Candy Kappa The Agenda of Existing Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Vikingland Posts: 14,596	Are you the guy who have the picture of the "C" stone? __________________ devianArt Instagram Youtube Tumblr Art Blog Patreon

12-20-2014, 01:37 PM	#104
Katie Just...way too serious. Join Date: May 2005 Location: purgatory Posts: 3,519	It's not hard to find an observatory which has time to view the LRO. Also helps that I live in a NASA town. Tha paralaxis stuff doesn't convince me. __________________ THE WORLD IS JUST AWESOME

12-21-2014, 06:38 AM	#115
Mayhem Foot Elite Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: London, England Posts: 4,079	Simplest explanation for the differences in flag movement is... the Mythbusters guys (and gal) used a lot more force in their experiment than was actually needed on the moon. The flag calms down eventually because of the resistance applied against the flag pole and holder itself. As for the flag moving at 2:37 when the astronaut moves past, I'm pretty certain he touched it ever so slightly with the left side of his suit or arm. But you'll never have a camera angle or better quality footage to prove otherwise. __________________ Lie with passion and be forever damned...

12-21-2014, 10:47 AM	#117
Katie Just...way too serious. Join Date: May 2005 Location: purgatory Posts: 3,519	Jarrah is an idiot. Not sure why you worship him so much. Looks like Grant was trying real hard not to tell him what an idiot he is. He used to be a part of this board....for actual TMNT talk. Physics in a vacuum explains the movement. The flag pole was touched. Action / reaction explains the movement until all the kinetic energy wears out, then the flag remains static, which it would not in an atmosphere considering all the movement around it. Occam's Razor, dude, Occam's Razor. __________________ THE WORLD IS JUST AWESOME

12-21-2014, 01:47 PM	#119
MsMarvelDuckie I Married a Duck! Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: The bowels of Hell, Texas(otherwise known as Decatur) Posts: 8,773	This brings up a nice little side-note- a Late Renaissance Italian motto of unknown attribution- Se non è vero, è ben trovato ("Even if it is not true, it is well conceived") when referred to a particularly artful explanation. The "fake" lunar landing theory certainly falls under this category. __________________ "You IDIOTS! You've captured their STUNT doubles!" -from "Spaceballs" "Where Science ends, magic begins." -Spiral, Uncanny X-Men #491 My various stories and fan-fics are now here- https://m.fanfiction.net/u/4770494/#end

12-20-2014, 01:45 PM	#108
~~Leo656~~ Banned Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: nWo Country Posts: 27,703	I wasn't sure if it was just that or if he was showing all this to someone else or something.

12-20-2014, 03:09 PM	#111
~~Leo656~~ Banned Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: nWo Country Posts: 27,703	Not gonna lie, I loved that part.

12-21-2014, 01:09 PM	#118
Peanut Second Gear Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The New World Posts: 15,422	Wait...he's linking Jarrah sh*t? There's no way this isn't Jarrah.