|
Disney + Agatha House of Harkness
|
Didn't know Marvel wanted to make series about FW April's aunt.
|
Quote:
|
So Agatha is going to snap out of it... and do what, exactly?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, I think you both miss the point here. The Fred Wolf show has a ton of characters show up but unless they had toys, they generally never showed up in anything else. Do you think it's a coincidence that a character like Mutagen Man, who was only ever in one episode, appears in both the 2012 cartoon and the IDW comic while someone like Agatha Marbles don't? |
Already this whole thread reeks of "the people of the Technodrome". The irony? Not only has it carried on, but the comment that took it off topic in the first place was a simple cast-off joke.
How on Earth did this reply.... Quote:
I mean... not only does it have nothing to do with the actual thread topic, but it doesn't even match up to the context or contingent of what could have only been an inside joke here on a TMNT community in the first place. I think neatoman needs a Drome Forum break..... Trust me, brother. I know. I've been there myself. :lol:;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And still it will be a 0,5 less than people who talk about FW series in one context or the other. :lol: Quote:
No other reason, like TV series, which was around for 10 years...Nope, just toys, because, according to you, no-one can genuinely like Fred Wolf series and remember it outside of toys, video games and other stuff inspired by it. Like in Russia, most people TMNT, because, of the TV series, toys come second, if it all. |
Quote:
You are correct about the show lasting for as long as it did because of some other reason than toys. It's not hard to "last 10 years" (actually slightly less than 9 but who's counting?) if your studio has no other successes under it's belt and the fact that the actual IP owner won't renew your contract if the show ends because they hate you, of course it kept going under that kind of pressure. Do you think it's a coincidence that the last three seasons were so short and overhauled the stylistic choices? Whatever, the point is more that it is memories of the show and the related products, not so much the show itself that remains in heart of pop culture. It's like Super Friends in that sense, sure people "remember" Super Friends and it was the most well known version of the JLA well into the 2000's, but there's also kind of a reason why the Bruce Timm cartoons largely rejected Super Friends and it has probably been referenced more on Robot Chicken and Family Guy than it has been by official DC material. |
Actually, you know what? Now that I think about it, the TMNT banter in this thread is actually better than the thread-thesis itself. Agatha is not a character that needs a show. It's just an opportunistic pump from Feige's ever growing extremism and drift from the books.
I mean seriously. "Agatha Harkness"? Given other things they could be doing and the time it takes and so on, seems like a huge waste of resources. More and more I'm thinking that Feige's Marvel has entered that liberal-business phase that ruins every organization - the "throw all of the $#!( ideas at the wall and see what sticks". And in the end these people act like they were movers and shakers but all you've got is a wall covered in $#!(. I'm not saying that on it's own merits it couldn't make entertaining T.V. or whatever. Just saying that it's front-loaded and at an opportunity cost for whatever else could be done. |
Alleged plot leak
Spoiler:
|
That sounds horrible.
|
Really thought this thread was gonna be an Agatha Christie murder mystery series reboot.
|
Olsen publicly teasing involvement, maybe the leak is real
https://deadline.com/2023/03/elizabe...sw-1235287018/ |
seeing as how Disney is ****, it wouldn't surprise me if that terrible plot leak is real.
|
I think there is a strong chance the leak is real because they have to get billy and tommy ready for new avengers which we all know is coming, and the existing actors aren't the right age. Also, I like those two characters, so I will be checking it out for that reason. Also Agatha was incredible in that series, of course I want more.
|
Now that the MCU is in trouble, it’s sinking in how goofy it was to green light “Echo” and “Agatha” series, while fans have been clamoring about X-Men for the five years you’ve owned them now.
And sorry Victoria Alonso, but I definitely don’t think we’ll be renaming them to “X-Women” or whatever you were planning on pushing. |
Quote:
|
Who honestly wants this?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bunch of stuff bumped due to strikes
|
|
They changed the title back, now several titles later and several before that one?
Not looking forward to this. Years later, and they're barely cobbling together an Agatha show, while Vision is nowhere even in sight, remotely? |
Quote:
https://variety.com/2024/tv/news/mar...as-1236003735/ |
|
Surely this will set the MCU back on track....
|
|
I don't... think I want to support that.
|
Looks decent enough but it is kind of ridiculous this is even being made, at least as part of the (now apparently more focused and minimized) MCU slate. Sure the characters and maybe events are owned by and part of Marvel but did we really need a whole show on this when there are dozens of more important characters that are in critical need of screen time?
If this show didn't have the Marvel tag I wouldn't tune in and even as being part of Marvel that won't get me to watch it either unless someone I trust on these things tells me its worth it. Just disappointing decision after decision from Marvel Studios. On the brightside Xmen 97 was gold, Deadpool & Wolverine looks good, and there should be a Captain America 4 trailer this week |
Quote:
https://comicbookmovie.com/tv/marvel...3159#gs.en8hkq |
Clearly greenlit before the big Marvel purge of activists.
|
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.