The Technodrome Forums

The Technodrome Forums (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/index.php)
-   TV and Movies (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Three Isn't The Charm Anymore*Movie Sequels* (http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/showthread.php?t=20224)

Spitfire 05-19-2007 06:29 PM

Three Isn't The Charm Anymore*Movie Sequels*
 
Okay seriously how many 3's are coming out this year? Let alone sequels.

Spider-man 3
Pirates 3
Sherk 3
Fantastic Four 2
Saw 4
TMNT 4
28 Weeks Later
Harry Potter*I don't even know*
Hellboy 2

Maybe this is an old topic but sequels are seriously over running our market. And it seems everyone usually lets us down.

Now sometimes the sequel is better then the first one but that hardly ever happens. And I haven't in the entire history of movies seen a 3rd movie that was better then the other ones in the series.

Some will argue that Return Of The King is the best LOTRs movie but I think Two Towers was better, and since it was all filmed at the same time I don't count them as separate films.

But I got to ask. What do you guys think about this? I mean do you guys enjoy sequels or do you want to see some more original stuff? I think how I feel is pretty obvious.

Peanut 05-19-2007 06:31 PM

Yeah, yeah. You hate everything. We know. We all know that.

愛 05-19-2007 06:34 PM

I'd rather see something I'm familiar and enjoyed rather than something new that I know nothing about.

Tinuvielsdreams 05-19-2007 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire666xXxXx (Post 517069)
Okay seriously how many 3's are coming out this year? Let alone sequels.

Spider-man 3
Pirates 3
Sherk 3
Fantastic Four 2
Saw 4
TMNT 4
28 Weeks Later
Harry Potter*I don't even know*
Hellboy 2

Maybe this is an old topic but sequels are seriously over running our market. And it seems everyone usually lets us down.

Now sometimes the sequel is better then the first one but that hardly ever happens. And I haven't in the entire history of movies seen a 3rd movie that was better then the other ones in the series.

Some will argue that Return Of The King is the best LOTRs movie but I think Two Towers was better, and since it was all filmed at the same time I don't count them as separate films.

But I got to ask. What do you guys think about this? I mean do you guys enjoy sequels or do you want to see some more original stuff? I think how I feel is pretty obvious.

I do agree with you on the Two Towers comment, it was my favorite.
I do think movies are overkilled for the almighty dollar most of the time.
I am famous for saying "Someone needs to stop them." This is usually directed to bad Disney sequels but it applies elsewhere.
I hope one day I can take my film and animation knowledge, get hired and do some really awesome independent stuff. In the mean time I will continue going and see every movie I can good or bad, after all if they didn't make bad ones what would we have to b*tch about...:P :D

Spitfire 05-19-2007 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ai (Post 517072)
I'd rather see something I'm familiar and enjoyed rather than something new that I know nothing about.

Yeah that was something I thought about I know people like stuff they already know what to expect.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tinuvielsdreams (Post 517073)
I do agree with you on the Two Towers comment, it was my favorite.
I do think movies are overkilled for the almighty dollar most of the time.
I am famous for saying "Someone needs to stop them." This is usually directed to bad Disney sequels but it applies elsewhere.
I hope one day I can take my film and animation knowledge, get hired and do some really awesome independent stuff. In the mean time I will continue going and see every movie I can good or bad, after all if they didn't make bad ones what would we have to b*tch about...:P :D

Me too, but I watch bad movies to see what they did wrong. That will only strengthen my ability to make movies.

Peanut 05-19-2007 06:40 PM

Christ. Does the world really need another Uwe Boll?

Tinuvielsdreams 05-19-2007 06:42 PM

exactly... You have to know what is bad and what is good.
Learn from other film makers and then go on to make bad ass films.
I love nothing more then to see a film, any film, and talk about it to whoever will listen.

Spitfire 05-19-2007 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peanut (Post 517075)
Christ. Does the world really need another Uwe Boll?

Being as how my standards are extremely high and I'm insanely anal about perfection I doubt you have anything to worry about.

I don't plan on making movies based off of pre-existing material and espcially video games. I'm all original and I plan on making stuff people haven't seen before. Which will require allot of work because the word original doesn't exist in Hollywood.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tinuvielsdreams (Post 517076)
exactly... You have to know what is bad and what is good.
Learn from other film makers and then go on to make bad ass films.
I love nothing more then to see a film, any film, and talk about it to whoever will listen.

Exactly, you ever want to chat about movies hit me up on AIM. I could always use someone to chat movies with. It's hard to find someone because most people are entertained by anything so they never have strong opinions.

ZariusTwo 05-19-2007 07:24 PM

So long as a sequel helps a story, it works

When it does'nt, it should'nt be made. Shrek The Third is one such unnecersary sequel that just cheapens the last two because it regurgitates pretty much the same humour, characters, and jokes from the second.

Voltron 05-19-2007 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire666xXxXx (Post 517079)
I don't plan on making movies based off of pre-existing material and espcially video games. I'm all original and I plan on making stuff people haven't seen before. Which will require allot of work because the word original doesn't exist in Hollywood.

Mark his words. One day, you'll be telling your kids how you've spoken with the producer of "Kill Phil," "Triassic Park," "Star Conflict Part I: The Ghostly Danger," and "Duke of the Tennis Bracelets."

Tinuvielsdreams 05-19-2007 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire666xXxXx (Post 517079)
Being as how my standards are extremely high and I'm insanely anal about perfection I doubt you have anything to worry about.

I don't plan on making movies based off of pre-existing material and espcially video games. I'm all original and I plan on making stuff people haven't seen before. Which will require allot of work because the word original doesn't exist in Hollywood.


Exactly, you ever want to chat about movies hit me up on AIM. I could always use someone to chat movies with. It's hard to find someone because most people are entertained by anything so they never have strong opinions.

I read this after I wrote you back. Hell yeah we should chat!

Peanut 05-19-2007 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire666xXxXx (Post 517079)
Exactly, you ever want to chat about movies hit me up on AIM. I could always use someone to chat movies with. It's hard to find someone because most people are entertained by anything so they never have strong opinions.

Dude, you better be careful. If you fall off that f*cking horse, the impact is going to kill you.

Courk 05-19-2007 08:50 PM

Spider-man 3 could have been so much better than it was. The first was good, and while the ending of Spider-man 2 made me chuckle, I remember having an overall positive feeling about that movie.

Pirates 1 = good, Pirates 2 only felt like half of a movie to me, so I'm holding out final judgment until I see Pirates 3, but I did like it for half of a movie.

Harry Potter -- I think the movies are decent. I'm a big fan of the books, so I am disappointed when aspects are changed or when things don't match my imagination. (To me, Sirius is hot. It doesn't really match the descriptions of how he looks in the present in the books, having dealt with everything that's happened, but I don't care.) I prefer the books, but the movies are watchable.

Of course, as a fan of MST3K, I have seen some awful, awful movies. Most main-stream "bad" movies I have seen are nothing compared to those on MST3K. I can think "Wow, that was a bad movie -- Oh, wait, no, Manos was worse."

ThirdMarioBro 05-19-2007 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire666xXxXx (Post 517069)
Okay seriously how many 3's are coming out this year? Let alone sequels.

Spider-man 3
Pirates 3
Sherk 3
Fantastic Four 2
Saw 4
TMNT 4
28 Weeks Later
Harry Potter*I don't even know*
Hellboy 2

Maybe this is an old topic but sequels are seriously over running our market. And it seems everyone usually lets us down.

Now sometimes the sequel is better then the first one but that hardly ever happens. And I haven't in the entire history of movies seen a 3rd movie that was better then the other ones in the series.

Some will argue that Return Of The King is the best LOTRs movie but I think Two Towers was better, and since it was all filmed at the same time I don't count them as separate films.

But I got to ask. What do you guys think about this? I mean do you guys enjoy sequels or do you want to see some more original stuff? I think how I feel is pretty obvious.

Blah blah blah

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peanut (Post 517109)
Dude, you better be careful. If you fall off that f*cking horse, the impact is going to kill you.

That's the greatest line I've ever heard.

gobo 05-19-2007 09:17 PM

Was 'Evan Almighty' mentioned yet? A flaming pile of crap that should be. If Carrey was going to break his "no sequels" policy for anything, that should have been it. Evan was the antagonist in 'Bruce', but now he's a prophet. :roll: And, is 'Rush Hour 3' supposed to be out by year-end?

Brodie 05-19-2007 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire666xXxXx (Post 517079)
Being as how my standards are extremely high

Didn't you like that weird movie about the strange serial killer who killed a cat or something?


Reeeeeeeeaaaallll High, sir.

Duke 05-19-2007 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire666xXxXx (Post 517079)
Which will require allot of work because the word original doesn't exist in Hollywood.

You're like that episode of South Park where Butter's minion keeps saying "the Simpsons did it, the Simpsons did it." All you ever seem to say is how nothing is original and everything sucks because it's all been done before.

ZariusTwo 05-19-2007 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Courk (Post 517116)
Spider-man 3 could have been so much better than it was.

I'd say it's not as bad as people make it out to be. All I've seen are that people did'nt want Spidey dark and brooding (contradicting of course, their love of Lee/Romita and the animated series, which could also be as dark as they wanted to be) or wanted a pile of s*it character in it for more than ten minutes when he probably got his best treatment in any medium besides the animated series.

Spitfire 05-20-2007 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peanut (Post 517109)
Dude, you better be careful. If you fall off that f*cking horse, the impact is going to kill you.

I'm not worried at all. I scrap my own work all the time when it doesn't meet my standards. I haven't done any artwork recently because every time I sit down to it comes out looking horrible and I refuse to accept that so I delete it.

I don't think I'm the best or better then anyone I just know I won't release anything unless I'm seriously satisfied with it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brodie (Post 517136)
Didn't you like that weird movie about the strange serial killer who killed a cat or something?


Reeeeeeeeaaaallll High, sir.

I have no clue what your talking about. If your trying to insult my tastes then pick something I actually said I liked.

Like Silent Hill, which everyone seems to hate. That's a movie I liked for it's art style though and that was pretty much it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duke (Post 517140)
You're like that episode of South Park where Butter's minion keeps saying "the Simpsons did it, the Simpsons did it." All you ever seem to say is how nothing is original and everything sucks because it's all been done before.

If you like monotony fine by me but no need to compare me to an episode of South Park making fun of it's critics claiming it was a Simpsons rip off when SP has been better then Simpsons for years now and is nothing like it.

But thank you to those of you who actually answered my question as opposed to trying to make me look like an ass. I know it's hard to stay on topic and not insult me but I'm sure if you try really hard you could do it.

Ra 05-20-2007 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire666xXxXx (Post 517069)
What do you guys think about this? I mean do you guys enjoy sequels or do you want to see some more original stuff? I think how I feel is pretty obvious.

I honestly don't mind sequels. They make me chuckle, but will never live up to the original. Pirates 2 springs to my mind instantly when I say that, since I was expecting something that would be as great (if not, greater) than the original. All I got out of it was seeing Geffory Rush eating an apple with juice oozing everywhere, an undead monkey, and Johnny getting to sing "I've got a jar of dirt!". Entertaining, but it just doesn't live up to the original.

I really do hope some original stuff will come out soon. I think I will gag when I see a plot for "Shreak 4" released to the public... :dead:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.