![]() |
Did the backlash cause them to backtrack on aliens Turtles and white Shredder?
Does anyone else think the fandom backlash actually made a difference this time?
The Turtles were clearly planned to be aliens from the beginning, as seen in the original scripts and Bay's comments, where the Turtles were actually from an alien Turtle race. But thankfully that alien angle seems to have been dropped, (or so we hope). Then we had white Eric Sachs announced to be Shredder, and now all of a sudden we have indication that Sachs isn't Shredder after all, and that Asian Oroku Saki is indeed in the film. White Shredder caused almost as big a backlash as alien Turtles, and it was reversed. Now obviously stuff like Megan Fox April didn't cause as much an uproar and it was probably too late to recast her role. The only other backlash is against the nostrils and humanoid faces for the Turtles, but the CG was probably too far in production to change it. So do you think fandom backlash made a difference? If this is the case, its proof internet uproar can sometimes makes a change and cause studio execs to backtrack. Never doubt the power of online message board ranting! |
without a doubt, I think the fans put a hell of a dent in this movie's production
|
Yes...Cubed it was all you. Pat yourself on the back.
|
absolutely and thankfully they went back to the drawing board and changed it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I will admit though, Leo is the best looking Turtle out of the four. If face wise Donnie, Mikey, and Raph looked like Leo, and they got rid of some stuff they had on, I'd be more open to the movie and the designs. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Shredder is and has been whats in the movie Since before they filmed, You think the Fans had a hand is shredder you just try to justify Why you feel for the whole thing I will say this the misdirection they were going for was changed because of fans IE the decided not to keep the new shredder(Japanese actor) a secret, because fans were impatient, and could not wait till the movie released to find out. Those who think other wise are just lying to themselves, Adding a whole new character with a whole new story arc Isn't as easy Most certainly could not have been done in two month worth of reshoots. Quote:
|
as much as we think studios like to check these boards, my guess is, nobody with any money/creative pull does. and by extension, they will do what they think is 1) in the best interest of the property (assuming they are actually fans, and 2) what will net the most profit (sometimes that means staying true to the property, other times it may mean deviating from it entirely)
sorry 'Cubed, we all have opinions here, but i doubt anyone outside these forums care what we all think. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So yeah Fan out cry isn't always something to be listened to |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Bioware went back and added more finalized endings...again did you actually play them or are you just going off what you heard. The only current "controversy" is which ending is the real one |
Quote:
http://kotaku.com/5898743/mass-effect-3s-ending-disrespects-its-most-invested-players Ive heard it From tons of different people From several different Game sites i fallow, and different video game developments constantly bring up the ending. |
Sachs was never supposed to be the Shredder, this was just a marketing thing similar to the the last Star Trek film. No whiny fanboy idiot caused the studio to "backtrack" on anything.
|
Quote:
|
William Fitcher seemed to think he was playing Shredder.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
In the Visual History book he talked about having a stunt double, so there was definitely some shreddin' going on at some point. Or something.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.