![]() |
|
|
#41 | |
|
Foot Elite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,708
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Britain, DINO THUNDER...POWER UP!
Posts: 22,505
|
Quote:
Thanks for proving most people against this movie and it's fans have acted way more juvenile than most little kids. The poll shows a lot of people enjoyed it, so I guess that means we're all "juvenile" to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 11,089
|
Quote:
What I meant was that the movie itself is juvenile and looked like it wasn't even remotely intended for adults in any other way than the nostalgia elements, so trying to market this movie towards adults failed because it's fundamentally not the kind of movie most adults are interested in. Fanservice is a cheap trick, that's why a huge portion people here liked it but they still didn't make a good movie as far as anyone outside the TMNT is concerned. Putting Bebop and Rocksteady in a bad movie doesn't make it a good movie somehow, it just makes it a bad movie with Bebop and Rocksteady in it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Stone Warrior
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: WI
Posts: 654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Random Punk
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NY
Posts: 28
|
It didn't earn 500 million, it scratched it's way over 400 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Foot Elite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,390
|
The failure of the 2nd movie is tied to the 1st movie though. I've said it before but it's tough to build something on a weak foundation. People didn't want to see a sequel to the 2014 movie. Blind nostalgia only gets you so far.
I also wouldn't call the 2014 a financial success either since they barely broke even on it according to reports. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | ||
|
Kitchen Ninja
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: I currently live in Cape may NJ im from Hillsboro Oregon
Posts: 2,788
|
Quote:
__________________
AVATAR ^_^ ....love you mom... Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Lord of Cinder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,646
|
Quote:
Of COURSE the first movie made more money because there was a sense of mystery to it. The mystery of whether or not it'd be good or not. People had hope. And then, that hope was shattered by the April O'Neil movie. They listened to fans for the second film (More Turtles, less April, Bebop/Rocksteady/Krang) and it came back to bite them in the ass because they screwed up that badly for the first film. They were banking on Bebop and Rocksteady being seat-fillers, but it seems that people don't want to go pay just for nostalgia. Anywho, the only actual con I can think of for a reboot (unless it's worse than these movies) is the fact that I really like the actors for the Turtles. I saw OOTS the other day (My friend was kind enough to take me, given that I didn't want to pay these bastards.), and quite frankly, those Turtle actors are really good. Everything else was either 'meh' or 'somewhat acceptable', though. The movie's god-tier compared to the first one, though. It's still bad, but it's like it's self-aware that it's bad. "That's how I roll. That's how you roll." Someone was paid to write this. But on the upside, maybe they could get actual teenagers to play/voice the Turtles. It'd make it sound more authentic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Hench Mutant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Toronto-ish
Posts: 341
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Like, stupid rich.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Rawkzone
Posts: 2,808
|
There's a big reason why it wasn't a financial success that most people aren't talking about. Aside from it not being a good movie, kids didn't like it the first time out. This wasn't a movie they watched over and over on Netflix. It was a movie they'd watch once and usually get distracted with something else halfway through. Parents see this, and so when the sequel comes out, they have no reason to shell out the bucks to take them to a movie their kids care for the first time around.
Then there's the whole issue of teenagers to adults simply not liking the movie. I do think if OOTS was the first movie out the gate, it would have been a much larger success than the first one. It's pacing, humour, and action would have kept the kids entertained while all the Fred Wolf pandering would have appeased the adults. As far as Cons go... well, someones gotta be looking at trends. TMNT II Secret of the Ooze underperformed, but still warranted a sequel... TMNT III underperformed... TMNT (2007) underperformed... TMNT (2014) underperformed, but still warranted a sequel... TMNT OOTS underperformed.. ..and none of them are critical hits. At some point someones gonna start believing TMNT works best just as a TV franchise that can move toys by itself and the big movie investment isn't quite worth it. I know some people want different things, whether it be an adaptation of Mirage, IDW, 2k3... but in order for these things to eventaully happen, the franchise needs to show it can still pull in money. It's not rocket science, guys. The more successful the franchise, the longer legs it gets, the more chances it gets to make the version you want to see. So while the Platinum Dunes Turtles are sooooo far away from the Turtles movie I'd like to see, I hope it succeeds enough to warrant the franchise getting another look. |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Annalist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,435
|
While this movie may be making less at the box office, I'm willing to bet it's making more merch sales than the first movie... 'cause B&R, duh.
![]() I mean, those Bebop and Rocksteady action figures look pretty great; I'd rather buy those than the Nick versions. The Turtles are, of course, atrocious. Same for Shredder. Nick versions all the way.
__________________
ALL THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Stone Warrior
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: WI
Posts: 654
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Annalist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,435
|
It's basically damned if you do, damned if you don't.
1. If you support the film franchise, you continue to get terrible movies. 2. If you don't support the film franchise, you run the risk of never getting big-screen TMNT again in the current film-going generation. Myself, I do honestly prefer the second option...
__________________
ALL THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,575
|
Did it? I see it ranked as the 12th highest grossing movie of the year.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Like, stupid rich.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Rawkzone
Posts: 2,808
|
Secret of the Ooze had double the budget and pulled in about half of what the first one did, so yeah, I'd say that probably fell below expectations.
It also played in more theatres than any other movie did that year to boot. Last edited by Krutch; 06-07-2016 at 12:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Hellblazer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ventura California
Posts: 9,193
|
Cons
1.Karai Wasted again 2. Shredder not fighting 3. more splinter would have been nice. I kinda wish he had an opening monolouge like in the 2014 movie.
__________________
I respect what FW cartoon did for the turtles franchise but it is the most overrated and hard to watch of the 3 turtles cartoons. |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Detoxed Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 11,225
|
Well I think for Andrew having TMNT 2 be inspired by the OT is a huge pro for you. Here you have the two things you hate being mixed into one interpretation so next movie version of the turtles won't have either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,575
|
Very true. I'm very, very OK with both being dropped into a barrel and napalmed simultaneously.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Mad Scientist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: North Liberty, Iowa
Posts: 1,234
|
Listening to the 'Most vocal Fans'? Which ones were those? Because they weren't listening to me, my friends, and other folks on here. We wanted Turtles that didn't look like crap, used Martial Arts, had real/concrete relationships between each other, didn't want Megan Fox (should have just recast her), didn't want fart/dick jokes, the characters to go to the Grown Up Table instead of stuck at the kiddie table/kiddie pool, and more. And we're the 'most vocal' fans. They didn't do that. They didn't 'listen'. So which ones were you referring to? To the people who were complaining about not getting Bebop, Rocksteady, Krang, and that's it? If that's the case, then maybe they listened to the wrong 'vocal fans'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,575
|
Pretty much just those. And Angry Nintendo Nerd and Black Nerd and probably Ivey (no offense) and taking that as our spokespeople.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| tmnt: oots |
|
|