![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mad Scientist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 1,224
|
Question about Star Trek Turtles
It is true that each figure in the Star Trek series is individually numbered? Do the numbers really mean anything if they were mass produced?
__________________
You guys mind telling me what you're doing to my little green pal over there, hm? -Casey Jones, TMNT movie... Last edited by BoggleKng; 01-18-2009 at 12:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
WingsOfDarkness! Perkele!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In 7803...
Posts: 4,366
|
I know the old Playmates Trek figs were numbered, honestly I dont think it means a thing.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Stone Warrior
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 630
|
![]() http://www.redshirt.co.uk/toys/star-trek-turtles/ It's a funny take on what was going on with that line.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Mad Scientist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 1,224
|
Yes, I found this article too but didn't answer my question. Is it out of habit because Playmate numbered the regular Star Trek figures too?
__________________
You guys mind telling me what you're doing to my little green pal over there, hm? -Casey Jones, TMNT movie... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Foot Elite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,439
|
You know, if they re-release these in co-ordinance with the new Star Trek movie and the 25th anniversary, I may just pick them up. I scoffed at them before, but they actually look pretty alright. I just never seen the Trekkie Turtles and the regular ones side by side before.
__________________
[Insert mildly amusing banner here] |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hench Mutant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: as far away from reality as possible
Posts: 307
|
Quote:
I'm not really sure what your asking but unless owning a low numbered figure is a really big deal to you then no, it doesn't mean anything. Playmates thought it was cool to number the Trek figures but they screwed it up so much rehashing already numbered legs as well as lotsa times making figures well into the 500,000's that most people didn't really pay attention to it anyway. They did a few cool things with it like offering sets on QVC with matching high numbers or auctioning really low numbered figures at the "One Weekend On Earth" convention in Alabama (I got a pair of wesleys numbered in the 50's that day) but those were the regular Trek figures not the Trek Turtles. Maybe Playmates thought that numbering the Trek Turtles would make them more appealing to the Star Trek collectors who didn't care about TMNT. I think that Playmates thought that the numbering thing was a bigger deal to collectors then it actually was. It's been my experience that unless you have #'s 1-10 or #1,701 it was no big deal to most people. It's been said that Playmates kept like the first 100 of most every figure they made anyway so finding an important low number is extremely hard. There were salesman samples that can fetch higher prices and usually instead of numbers they had something like iiiiii on them. Last edited by NoPressApril; 01-19-2009 at 11:36 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Mad Scientist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 1,224
|
Yeah, I remember when they did number the Trek figures and it did get quite out of hand. I figured the same was true with the Ninja turtle Star Trek figures..
__________________
You guys mind telling me what you're doing to my little green pal over there, hm? -Casey Jones, TMNT movie... |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|