![]() |
|
|
#11 | |
|
trash
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,546
|
Quote:
On the other hand, you've got Dahmer, who was not particularly socially functional and was very quiet and withdrawn. What's fascinating about serial killers is that there are so many different sub-categories. Some of them are highly organized - like Gacy or Ivan Milat; they're methodical in planning out their hunt, choosing a victim, the body disposal etc. Then you've got the disorganized serial killers like Richard Ramirez or Ottis Toole, where there's minimal planning, victims are chosen at random and there's little effort made to cover up the crime. Disorganized serial killers tend to differ significantly from organized serial killers in that they have lower IQs and are obviously antisocial (for example, poor hygiene and scruffy appearance, unemployed, minimal effort made to fake normal human emotions etc). Both disorganized and disorganized types are antisocial and psychopathic, but the psychology and behaviors displayed by the two generally have significant differences. Not only that but then you have the additional sub-categories where there's further ground for psychological exploration; you've got your necrophiles, 'angel of death'/medical killer types, sexual sadist/torture-murderers, cannibalistic murderers, black widows... There's this myth that serial killers are all these reclusive, dysfunctional losers, and generally, they aren't - they look just like us, they hide among us. In a way, they're the ultimate bogeyman because they're the real thing.
__________________
![]() Creator of the Technodrome After Dark Discussion Group. PM for an invite (must be over 18 - no exceptions). |
|
|
|
|
|
|