01-31-2019, 12:31 PM
|
#11
|
|
Annalist
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AquaParade
I think it's more nebulous than that.
Mirage itself managed to capture a semi-wide range of tones in just the first volume. I imagine we are mostly just speaking to the Laird/Eastman - penned issues though, and when it comes to those, I think it captures more than half of what was conveyed in the books.
From the story beats of Saki/Splinter's origin (nobody misses Nagi), Casey's introduction, the final rooftop battle, to the character work on Raphael, and the dark, grainy, DIY aesthetic that I mentioned above, which was a great asset in relating the movie back to those original black and white issues.
Obviously it's not a straight outline of those first twelve-issues (which would be boring - please creators, have some creative liberty when switching storytelling mediums), but you really can't ask for much more...I mean, except for more. We can't really expect him to encompass all that Mirage fully represents in one film.
Had the first film had sequels by Steve Baron, I imagine we could have seen more Mirage elements thrown into the stew.
I mean, for the 90 minutes it has available, what 60% of crucial elements is it missing from Mirage? I still agree that it's not a perfect Mirage adaption, but unless you're just being facetious, your argument of it only containing "40%" of Mirage - DNA (this is a really tricky thing to accurately measure) is sort of dumbfounding to me.
If using these inadequate measurements, I'd say the film is at least 70% Mirage-fueled. Probably more.
|
Only non-Mirage things I can think of are April being a reporter and colored bandannas. (And, arguably, the characterization of the Turtles.)
And, of course, the Penningtons. Ugh.
__________________
ALL THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED
|
|
|