Do you think the John Fusco draft was worse than the "Bay" movie?

*pannoni1* · 11-05-2012, 08:36 PM

A movie that is dark/violent doesn't necessarily make a movie "awful", and us hardcore surely would have approved of a darker version which may not do all that well by scaring away some of the more casual crowd, but Fusco's had the potential to really exploit why the original Mirage universe was violent. The studio could have simply PG-13-fied it, but it contained much more of what us was seeking, and most importantly, the lack of aliens. At least have a dark Shredder and Foot that is a REAL threat to the Turtles that no other version has ever shown. The actors/crew could have always ad-libbed some extra jokes/references along anyways that Fusco forgot, which is much easier to do than have some bizarre creatures with a meddled plot.

11-05-2012, 08:36 PM	#6
pannoni1 Foot Elite Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: USA Posts: 3,447	A movie that is dark/violent doesn't necessarily make a movie "awful", and us hardcore surely would have approved of a darker version which may not do all that well by scaring away some of the more casual crowd, but Fusco's had the potential to really exploit why the original Mirage universe was violent. The studio could have simply PG-13-fied it, but it contained much more of what us was seeking, and most importantly, the lack of aliens. At least have a dark Shredder and Foot that is a REAL threat to the Turtles that no other version has ever shown. The actors/crew could have always ad-libbed some extra jokes/references along anyways that Fusco forgot, which is much easier to do than have some bizarre creatures with a meddled plot. __________________ http://forums.thetechnodrome.com/sho...d.php?t=37065- MY WANT LIST TMNT FAN CLUB LINK: http://sot.ag/gCjK/ 30 years of Turtle Power!