fox's fantastic four reboot - Page 4

*TurtleTitan97* · 01-27-2015, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdp

Let's hope they don't mess up Doom again, easily the worst part of the first two movies

Considering the fact they turned him into "Victor Domashev" and a computer hacker, I think it's a little too late to be hoping for that.

ScrewtheMirageTMNT · 01-27-2015, 04:42 PM

The tone isn't right at all. It's doesn't align with the type of characters the fantastic four are.

*Bry* · 01-27-2015, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdp

And you may not like what Fox is doing with F4, but maybe they're going with the darker outfits since it fits the X-Men universe better and they already did comic accurate costumes their first tries at the franchise.

All the more reason to give their outfits some colour - they need something to set them apart from the X-Men uniforms. As-is, you could slip them in a lineup with these guys and nobody would notice:

*BabyTurtles* · 01-27-2015, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bry

All the more reason to give their outfits some colour - they need something to set them apart from the X-Men uniforms. As-is, you could slip them in a lineup with these guys and nobody would notice:

http://s17.postimg.org/94b101lq7/xmen.jpg

man those costumes need color XD

TonySiegel · 01-27-2015, 08:15 PM

i picture the fantastic four in more high and vibrant color situations...

B-Man · 01-27-2015, 10:09 PM

Pretty dull/unexciting teaser for a film this big.

~~JakeSully~~ · 01-28-2015, 06:40 AM

Who agrees that we need to make this flop and the rights go back to Disney/Marvel as Disney/Marvel is a better place for FF? and who wants Galactus in Avengers 3 part 2 and Guardians of the Galaxy even Silver Surfer?

Who'd love to see the 1994 film on MST3K/Rifftrack?

~~Amaranthus~~ · 01-28-2015, 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeSully

Who agrees that we need to make this flop and the rights go back to Disney/Marvel as Disney/Marvel is a better place for FF? and who wants Galactus in Avengers 3 part 2 and Guardians of the Galaxy even Silver Surfer?

Who'd love to see the 1994 film on MST3K/Rifftrack?

That's incredibly biased.
Stop hating on Fox just because it isn't Marvel Studios.

*Candy Kappa* · 01-28-2015, 10:34 AM

I'm not a fan of Fox. I don't think the majority of the Marvel based Superhero movies are any good.

Daredevil was bad (only seen theatrical cut though), both Fantastic Four movies was terrible, X-Men 2 is horrible, X-Men 3 is pretty dull, Wolverine Origins is the worst.

I woundnt mind someone else handling FF, someone that isn't afraid of having a fun movie and embrace the comic book aspect.

ScrewtheMirageTMNT · 01-28-2015, 05:30 PM

People don't hate fox cause they aren't marvel studios, it's because they don't make comic book movies faithful enough and well made.

*Autbot_Benz* · 01-28-2015, 05:32 PM

Fox did a great job with Xmen Days of Future Past. This FF movie just looks boring.

*Cure* · 01-28-2015, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeSully

Who agrees that we need to make this flop and the rights go back to Disney/Marvel as Disney/Marvel is a better place for FF?

I wasn't impressed by the trailer, either, but watch the movie first before wanting to make it flop. Damn.

Also, I don't know why it's cool to hate Fox all of a sudden. Days of Future Past and First Class are great.

*ToTheNines* · 01-28-2015, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cure

Also, I don't know why it's cool to hate Fox all of a sudden. Days of Future Past and First Class are great.

Right? They've been making crappy X-Men movies since the dawn of time and it was all cool, but now that they've got their ducks in a row everyone's hating.

Probably just stems from the fact that Marvel is a bfd right now, and they're doing up to three movies a year plus television, comics, Netflix etc. So I can see why people want Marvel to have the rights I guess.

For me personally I think Spider-Man and his rogues can easily hold their own and doesn't need to cross over. And the whole "mutants effing suck" thing works much better in an isolated universe. On top of that if Marvel had Spidey, X-Men, FF... we'd never have **** like Guardians, Ant-Man, Cap Marvel.

*TheCanadiandrome* · 01-28-2015, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cure

I wasn't impressed by the trailer, either, but watch the movie first before wanting to make it flop. Damn.

pretty much

*TheBlueTurtle1* · 01-29-2015, 01:40 AM

You know what I hate about this, these characters and stoies become popular and loved enough to get movies, so what do they do? Change who these characters really are....

Its not about Johnny Storm being black, but is't the fact they have change the characters roots, and Mr fantastic is way to young, Sue and Johnny can't be siblings. Why the f*~# mess with something that didn't need to be messed with.

I wanted to see a movie abot the Fantastci Four, not some rip off team.

*Candy Kappa* · 01-29-2015, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToTheNines

Probably just stems from the fact that Marvel is a bfd right now, and they're doing up to three movies a year plus television, comics, Netflix etc. So I can see why people want Marvel to have the rights I guess.

Something we'd never see if Marvel had the movie rights to X-men and Spider-Man, and I guess Fantastic Four. I'm glad Marvel doesn't have Spider-man and Wolverine, cause then we'd never have Guardians of the Galaxy or in the future Doctor Strange, heck we might have not gotten an Iron Man movie if Marvel had the rights to do a Spidey movie.

*TheSkeletonMan939* · 01-29-2015, 12:24 PM

Someone mixed the Interstellar audio with the FF video.. the fact that this felt like the exact same trailer makes me very very sad...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Candy Kappa

I'm glad Marvel doesn't have Spider-man and Wolverine, cause then we'd never have Guardians of the Galaxy or in the future Doctor Strange, heck we might have not gotten an Iron Man movie if Marvel had the rights to do a Spidey movie.

Yeah, that is one positive to Marvel not having X-Men or Spidey. They're willing to take more risks and try harder to make good movies in order to get the maximum audience possible... now that I think about it, not having Spider-Man might be Marvel's greatest strength.

~~Leo656~~ · 01-29-2015, 12:37 PM

Sure sucks if you actually like Spider-Man, though. Like, if you'd trade all that other stuff for one or two decent Spidey flicks, it's gotta be pretty maddening.

Like, I know I'm in the Nerd Minority, but I'm in the Global Majority when I say I'd trade a dozen "Dr. Strange" movies and another dozen "Ant-Man"s just to get a Spider-Man franchise that didn't start to collapse on itself halfway through the first movie.

I mean, yeah, "Obscure characters/properties, whoo-hoo!" Just sucks when some of the more popular and mainstream ones still haven't been done very well.

Kind of a catch-22, I guess. There's no impetus to do a "good" movie with a big-name character, because the name sells it. We've seen that you can literally make any garbage movie, but stick Spidey, Wolverine, or TMNT in it, and people will go pay to see it. Take something obscure that nobody cares about like "Guardians", though, and you'd BETTER make a good movie or else everyone's gonna laugh you out of the business, asking why you took a gamble on a no-name brand like that in the first place.

Makes sense, I guess. Just frustrating.

*CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy* · 01-29-2015, 02:10 PM

I think another lesson to learn is that if your audience knows that better things are coming (ala Avengers team-up or Justice League), they'll be more forgiving of crappy movies. The Thor franchise in particular sucks, and some would say that the only good Iron Man movie was the first one. Man of Steel as well. But as long as people keep looking to the future, you can skate by on "meh" movies... for awhile, anyway.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leo656

Sure sucks if you actually like Spider-Man, though. Like, if you'd trade all that other stuff for one or two decent Spidey flicks, it's gotta be pretty maddening.

Like, I know I'm in the Nerd Minority, but I'm in the Global Majority when I say I'd trade a dozen "Dr. Strange" movies and another dozen "Ant-Man"s just to get a Spider-Man franchise that didn't start to collapse on itself halfway through the first movie.

I mean, yeah, "Obscure characters/properties, whoo-hoo!" Just sucks when some of the more popular and mainstream ones still haven't been done very well.

Kind of a catch-22, I guess. There's no impetus to do a "good" movie with a big-name character, because the name sells it. We've seen that you can literally make any garbage movie, but stick Spidey, Wolverine, or TMNT in it, and people will go pay to see it. Take something obscure that nobody cares about like "Guardians", though, and you'd BETTER make a good movie or else everyone's gonna laugh you out of the business, asking why you took a gamble on a no-name brand like that in the first place.

Makes sense, I guess. Just frustrating.

*TheBlueTurtle1* · 01-29-2015, 02:34 PM

I think most people want to see a movie about the fantastic 4 not a bunch of modded characters.

Why let a franchise grow enough interest to warrent a movie, then change the core fundaments that actually made it popular to begin with?????

01-27-2015, 04:42 PM	#62
ScrewtheMirageTMNT Hench Mutant Join Date: Jul 2014 Posts: 493	The tone isn't right at all. It's doesn't align with the type of characters the fantastic four are. Last edited by ScrewtheMirageTMNT; 01-27-2015 at 04:48 PM.

01-27-2015, 08:15 PM	#65
TonySiegel Stone Warrior Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Worldwide Posts: 638	i picture the fantastic four in more high and vibrant color situations... __________________ "...Color or creed, is no need for a man to bleed/ I believe, we all breathe the same seed/ Unless it's diluted, for somethin to intrude it..." - Kool G. Rap

01-27-2015, 10:09 PM	#66
B-Man Hench Mutant Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: New Zealand Posts: 406	Pretty dull/unexciting teaser for a film this big. __________________ "They were many. But we kicked... We fought well."

01-28-2015, 10:34 AM	#69
Candy Kappa The Agenda of Existing Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Vikingland Posts: 14,596	I'm not a fan of Fox. I don't think the majority of the Marvel based Superhero movies are any good. Daredevil was bad (only seen theatrical cut though), both Fantastic Four movies was terrible, X-Men 2 is horrible, X-Men 3 is pretty dull, Wolverine Origins is the worst. I woundnt mind someone else handling FF, someone that isn't afraid of having a fun movie and embrace the comic book aspect. __________________ devianArt Instagram Youtube Tumblr Art Blog Patreon

01-28-2015, 05:30 PM	#70
ScrewtheMirageTMNT Hench Mutant Join Date: Jul 2014 Posts: 493	People don't hate fox cause they aren't marvel studios, it's because they don't make comic book movies faithful enough and well made. Last edited by ScrewtheMirageTMNT; 01-28-2015 at 10:06 PM.

01-28-2015, 06:40 AM	#67
~~JakeSully~~ Banned Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 782	Who agrees that we need to make this flop and the rights go back to Disney/Marvel as Disney/Marvel is a better place for FF? and who wants Galactus in Avengers 3 part 2 and Guardians of the Galaxy even Silver Surfer? Who'd love to see the 1994 film on MST3K/Rifftrack?

01-28-2015, 05:32 PM	#71
Autbot_Benz Hellblazer Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Ventura California Posts: 9,192	Fox did a great job with Xmen Days of Future Past. This FF movie just looks boring. __________________ I respect what FW cartoon did for the turtles franchise but it is the most overrated and hard to watch of the 3 turtles cartoons.

01-29-2015, 01:40 AM	#75
TheBlueTurtle1 Foot Elite Join Date: May 2012 Location: UK Posts: 2,892	You know what I hate about this, these characters and stoies become popular and loved enough to get movies, so what do they do? Change who these characters really are.... Its not about Johnny Storm being black, but is't the fact they have change the characters roots, and Mr fantastic is way to young, Sue and Johnny can't be siblings. Why the f*~# mess with something that didn't need to be messed with. I wanted to see a movie abot the Fantastci Four, not some rip off team. __________________ http://jandmdev.deviantart.com/ (My Brother and I have a dev page, I am J, brother is M)

01-29-2015, 12:37 PM	#78
~~Leo656~~ Banned Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: nWo Country Posts: 27,703	Sure sucks if you actually like Spider-Man, though. Like, if you'd trade all that other stuff for one or two decent Spidey flicks, it's gotta be pretty maddening. Like, I know I'm in the Nerd Minority, but I'm in the Global Majority when I say I'd trade a dozen "Dr. Strange" movies and another dozen "Ant-Man"s just to get a Spider-Man franchise that didn't start to collapse on itself halfway through the first movie. I mean, yeah, "Obscure characters/properties, whoo-hoo!" Just sucks when some of the more popular and mainstream ones still haven't been done very well. Kind of a catch-22, I guess. There's no impetus to do a "good" movie with a big-name character, because the name sells it. We've seen that you can literally make any garbage movie, but stick Spidey, Wolverine, or TMNT in it, and people will go pay to see it. Take something obscure that nobody cares about like "Guardians", though, and you'd BETTER make a good movie or else everyone's gonna laugh you out of the business, asking why you took a gamble on a no-name brand like that in the first place. Makes sense, I guess. Just frustrating.

01-29-2015, 02:34 PM	#80
TheBlueTurtle1 Foot Elite Join Date: May 2012 Location: UK Posts: 2,892	I think most people want to see a movie about the fantastic 4 not a bunch of modded characters. Why let a franchise grow enough interest to warrent a movie, then change the core fundaments that actually made it popular to begin with????? __________________ http://jandmdev.deviantart.com/ (My Brother and I have a dev page, I am J, brother is M)