Avengers The Kang Dynasty

[Sumac]

Originally Posted by neatoman

Yup. As for X-Men TAS, he's in the episode "End and Beginning" in which he first shows up as a seemingly original character but right at the end her turns into his Immortus Persona. X-Men TAS was a bit weird about using other Marvel characters, Spider-Man TAS may have used the X-Men from X-Men TAS for several episodes but X-Men TAS itself was only allowed to show Spider-Man's hand.

I remember, there was an episode, which a lot of silent cameos from other Marvel characters and Spider-Man was there crawling along the wall or something. Or was it another series?

Originally Posted by Coola Yagami

Of course that would only have made things more awkward when the actor would get in trouble years later.....

Should have just make him green or CGI him, up until his appearance as a proper character, like wit Thanos. Would have saved a lot of troubles.

[Autbot_Benz]

[IMJ]

More of what happens in the culture of "woke". Glad you posted the picture though - some clown-wage-employee here might think he's changing the world by demanding a "source" for this news that couldn't possibly be true.

[Sumac]

More from Deadline.
Now, it will be interesting to see what Disney will do with Kang.

[IMJ]

Originally Posted by Sumac

More from Deadline.
Now, it will be interesting to see what Disney will do with Kang.

What they should do is age him, call him "Immortus" and get Denzel Washington to play him considering that
A) they already "woked" Kang up on film
and
B) Denzel is a neverending super star of coolness

It's a solution.

[TigerClaw]

The Kang Dynasty is now being referred to as Avengers 5.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/mo...ng-1235391129/

Marvel has two courses it could take now. It could recast the part, although it is not clear how many actors would be attracted to a role from which one actor was so publicly fired. The other course is to redevelop its plans and refocus on a brand new villain. While Marvel sources are mum, there is indication that the studio has already been doing just that. In November, Marvel hired Loki creator Michael Waldron to work on a new draft of what was to have been Kang Dynasty, but is now being referred to as Avengers 5, according to sources.

[robertfiduciary]

And is the "clown-wage-employee" in the room with you right now?

As someone in a relationship where, between us, we hold just over 1,000 shares of Disney stock (with a cost basis of just under $25. So, yes. The last few years have been disappointing, but we're more than fine with the growth over the years. Plus, they just reinstated the dividend. So maybe some rocky waters, still. But we'll be fine), I've read every Disney financial report the company has issued since the Marvel purchase (Todd got his Disney stock as a gift from his wonderful Grandmother. Mine came from owning Marvel stock).

As for "clown-wage," well. That's pretty rich from a guy who apparently has all the time in the world to sit at a computer and type. The. Same. F*cking. Thing. Every. Single. Day. Like some sad, modern Don Quixote (that's a book character from a book you've probably never read. But keep tilting at those windmills, little slugger).

Einstein said insanity was doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results. I feel... well, we're all probably guilty of that a bit.
Wouldn't you agree, "IMJ?"

And if you wouldn't, here's a FUN LITTLE EXPERIMENT you can try!

1. Go to the search function of this very website

2. Search the words "peasant" or "peasant-thinker" or "woke."

3. See how many times you, and you alone, decided to sit down and write out the same viewpoint, about the same issues, day after day, months after month, year after year. I mean, none of us are getting any younger. Unless you're a vampire. But if you are, I doubt you'd care much about any of this.

So, yeah. Have fun with that. And there's nothing wrong with asking for sources in the age of AI, deepfakes, and often delusional claims. It's called trust, but verify. I'm surprised you don't approve, considering it was Republican God Ronald Reagan who made it popular.

And, what's more: financially, we're doing fine. House is paid off. Cars (both Toyota Corollas) paid off. Investments in great shape. Our relationship is great. Still considering a move cross country next year, but we'll see.

Also *toying* with the idea of tying the knot, but... a lot of the future of the country (and our rights) feels real "up in the air" still. Don't want to spend all the money, only to have the moment stolen after.

So, we'll see. But, yeah. Maybe find a different hobby? Woodworking? Bird watching? There's so much more to do in this world then just being a P.I.G. (Todd made that up. It stands for "Perpetual Internet Guy").

Love,

Rob

Originally Posted by IMJ

More of what happens in the culture of "woke". Glad you posted the picture though - some clown-wage-employee here might think he's changing the world by demanding a "source" for this news that couldn't possibly be true.

[XERO]

Feel better?

[IMJ]

Originally Posted by XERO

Feel better?

Originally Posted by TigerClaw

The Kang Dynasty is now being referred to as Avengers 5.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/mo...ng-1235391129/

I'm sure it will get another name change as time goes on.

Right now they are more concerned with their flop-in-the-making, "Woke Captain America" that was prepared to lecture people even more than it did in it's T.V. show.

In the meantime I'll be finding more and more clever ways to define and describe your average peasant thinker in clear and concise ways.

[Andrew NDB]

Originally Posted by robertfiduciary

Also *toying* with the idea of tying the knot, but... a lot of the future of the country (and our rights) feels real "up in the air" still. Don't want to spend all the money, only to have the moment stolen after.

hahahahahahahahaha!!!

[neatoman]

So like... Recast or a different character? If the latter, then which character would be reasonably similar to Kang to fill a similar role? Apocalypse? Beyonder? Galactus? Unless of course they just scrap the current direction entirely...

[XERO]

It just sucks because I was enjoying this guy's career so much. Not just in MCU, but overall.

[ZariusTwo]

Originally Posted by Sumac

I remember, there was an episode, which a lot of silent cameos from other Marvel characters and Spider-Man was there crawling along the wall or something. Or was it another series?

You're right, Spidey (or at least his arm) made a cameo in the Phoenix Saga finale. His clone Scarlet Spider also cameoed at one point.

[Andrew NDB]

Originally Posted by neatoman

So like... Recast or a different character? If the latter, then which character would be reasonably similar to Kang to fill a similar role? Apocalypse? Beyonder? Galactus? Unless of course they just scrap the current direction entirely...

MY hope is that they just recast and include the "real" Kang in whatever big Avengers 5 stuff is going on, but also have another heavy.

Kudos to Marvel/Disney, though, for at least sticking by Majors until he was found guilty in a court of law and not just the court of public opinion. This will probably f*** up Michael B. Jordan's plans for Creed 4, too... he was definitely going to come back as supporting cast in it. Now he just has Victor Drago and that's it, unless Winkler somehow makes nice with Stallone. You can recast superheroes but recasting wouldn't really work in something like the Rocky/Creed films.

[Sumac]

Originally Posted by robertfiduciary

And is the "clown-wage-employee" in the room with you right now?

As someone in a relationship where, between us, we hold just over 1,000 shares of Disney stock (with a cost basis of just under $25. So, yes. The last few years have been disappointing, but we're more than fine with the growth over the years. Plus, they just reinstated the dividend. So maybe some rocky waters, still. But we'll be fine), I've read every Disney financial report the company has issued since the Marvel purchase (Todd got his Disney stock as a gift from his wonderful Grandmother. Mine came from owning Marvel stock). ...

You are rambling like an A class schizoid.

You need a ****ing doctor, man.
Like now.

[IMJ]

Originally Posted by Sumac

You are rambling like an A class schizoid.

You need a ****ing doctor, man.
Like now.

You are trying to talk to a Technodromer who is trying to prove that he has an "investor presence" by owning 1,000 shares of Disney stock. That right there is evidence of the kind of phony @$$wipe you are conversing with. Any investor worth anything or with any research time under his belt would not dig in deep on Disney in this climate for .15 a share, and would have known better than to by-in during a social-agenda-movement by the company.

Probably inherited 15 grand from his Grandmother and thought he was changing his family's trajectory by investing it in Disney stock. And then proud enough to use 1,000 shares of Disney stock as a prove-tool on the Technodrome forums.

Guy uses a username like "robert fiduciary" to project some kind of 'knowledge" to anyone who sees his name but I've yet to see him ever post anything of reason outside of circular "REEEEEE!!!! I MUST BE RIGHT!" liberal arguments. His username should be "Notary Public" - busy witnessing and signing off on life-angry liberal tears.

So let him ramble. He has literally never, not once made a cogent, respect earning post.

[XERO]

Originally Posted by Andrew NDB

Now he just has Victor Creed and that's it

Victor Creed. Hahahaha.

Creed III was amazing, and Majors carried that film. Even if Dame was gonna be a supporting character in IV, it might just get reduced to a name mention and that's being lenient.

I dunno, man, it's just sad. Guilty or not guilty, evidence or no evidence, judicial system all be damned, he dug a hole too deep to climb out of.

[oldmanwinters]

Brilliant!
https://www.instagram.com/p/C1Cs7IIu..._web_copy_link

[Andrew NDB]

Originally Posted by oldmanwinters

Brilliant!
https://www.instagram.com/p/C1Cs7IIu..._web_copy_link
https://i.imgur.com/YUKuzr1.jpg

I'd be OK with that, honestly. I saw some pretty convincing Denzel mockups, too, but there's 0 chance he would agree to it.

[TheCanadiandrome]

Originally Posted by neatoman

So like... Recast or a different character? If the latter, then which character would be reasonably similar to Kang to fill a similar role? Apocalypse? Beyonder? Galactus? Unless of course they just scrap the current direction entirely...

I've heard/read rumors of Doctor Doom, but I don't think he's a major threat the likes of those you listed for sure. I do think they'll most likely recast