US American politics

[IMJ]

Originally Posted by Mayhem

You do realise not everyone on the left is an atheist and not everyone on the right is a Christian?

Oh I definitely do not need to be lectured on "blanket statements" or absolute-thinking by you.

Nice try.

[Galactus]

Originally Posted by IMJ

Thank God you leftist clowns have no guiding belief system tied to heaven nor hell. No surprise that you'd try to weaponize though.

To be fair, as a right wing christian surely you'd think Lindsey Graham is going to hell for all that gay sex he's had.

[Mayhem]

Originally Posted by Galactus

To be fair, as a right wing christian surely you'd think Lindsey Graham is going to hell for all that gay sex he's had.

Oh yeah I suspect a whole load of people have forgotten some of those incidents… Grindr stock down 1%.

Originally Posted by IMJ

Oh I definitely do not need to be lectured on "blanket statements" or absolute-thinking by you.

You also keep assuming I’m left wing, nice try…

[IMJ]

Originally Posted by Galactus

To be fair, as a right wing christian surely you'd think Lindsey Graham is going to hell for all that gay sex he's had.

I mean...
I don't know.... are you going to hell for it? Is that a thing?

It would be a very strange division of labor for hell to littered with murderers, rapists and... gay people? The math aint mathing.

[ranger_scout]

The Democrats might need to rethink about candidates with extreme socialism. A viral Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) interview on Fox News where things like abolishing the Senate and prisions as well as replacing the Presidency and Supreme Court are not sitting well with moderates.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...view-blowback/

[IMJ]

The entire Democrat party has been contaminated for years now by the extreme-hyperbolic-doctrines of Hilary Clinton's school-of-thought.

They really need a voice of reason as opposed to a voice of rage-bait for extremists and the self-angry.

[Coola Yagami]

I kinda feel the democrats have to tone down all the wilder woke ideas long enough make it into office and win and then do all the gender things after the fact.

People don't want to admit Kamala being on the side 'that can't even define what a woman is' and 'thinks men can have periods too' cost her the election as much as everything else.

Even if they pick the most charismatic and likeable candidate, the moment they open their mouths about multiple genders, it's all over.

I know it's a smaller issue when compared to more important things that actually affect the economy and such, but there are enough voters out there that will vote for the other side because the gender stuff turns them off enough.

[IMJ]

Originally Posted by Coola Yagami

People don't want to admit Kamala being on the side 'that can't even define what a woman is' and 'thinks men can have periods too' cost her the election as much as everything else.

Can't decide what a woman is as you said, yet want Kamala to be the "first woman president". More evidence that these people are endlessly full of $#!( and disingenuous at every turn.

Hence, the "Hilary Clinton school of thought" when it comes to politics. And a lot of this is deeply rooted in Hilary's wildly liberal college-professor-mentor when she was younger. The lineage-of-insanity that has infected the Democrat party is actually quite fascinating.

To your point about getting into office "first", I will say that it won't matter. The democrat party doesn't believe in their hyperbole anyway. They thought to use it to rile up the average peasant-thinker counting on those votes to get them into office - not because they believe in their platform-of-insanity.

I mean let's be completely honest here - what use are the blue-haired tele-tubby community to the Democrat-party once they hold power? Nothing. There is no incentive for that party to do anything but deliver platitudes-for-votes. It's nothing more than having an archetype-of-their-beliefs in office for the blue-hairs.

[Mayhem]

Originally Posted by Coola Yagami

I know it's a smaller issue when compared to more important things that actually affect the economy and such, but there are enough voters out there that will vote for the other side because the gender stuff turns them off enough.

Quite, sadly. Same as you only voting in someone non white male once in your history…

[Andrew NDB]

Originally Posted by Coola Yagami

I kinda feel the democrats have to tone down all the wilder woke ideas long enough make it into office and win and then do all the gender things after the fact.

lol, that's what they always do. And if they're 60, they publicly say they no longer believe things they said they wanted when they were 56. Like, "I was a totally different person then." Like Kamala previously advocating for taxpayer funds to pay for prison inmates' trans surgeries while in prison.

Originally Posted by Coola Yagami

I know it's a smaller issue when compared to more important things that actually affect the economy and such, but there are enough voters out there that will vote for the other side because the gender stuff turns them off enough.

Largely, see: "parents."

[IMJ]

Originally Posted by Mayhem

Quite, sadly. Same as you only voting in someone non white male once in your history…

As a white male yourself you should be ashamed for talking to a hispanic man that way and sit down silently even if his opinion differs from your own. After all, that is your belief-system but you aren't honoring it.

[Mayhem]

Might be the white cucks there but not here heh

[ranger_scout]

What a surprise. Kamala Harris believes in packing the Supreme Court by expanding it to 13 justices.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/31/polit...ourt-expansion

[Andrew NDB]

Originally Posted by ranger_scout

What a surprise. Kamala Harris believes in packing the Supreme Court by expanding it to 13 justices.

That's a great idea. We can use some more conservative leaning ones right now on there.

[neatoman]

Originally Posted by Andrew NDB

That's a great idea. We can use some more conservative leaning ones right now on there.

Aren't literally two thirds of them appointed by Republicans?

[Mayhem]

Originally Posted by neatoman

Aren't literally two thirds of them appointed by Republicans?

Yep, the “problem” is as soon as any of them act in a supposedly anti Republican way (as opposed to you know, upholding the constitution which is their primary goal) they get screamed at for being traitors

[IMJ]

Originally Posted by neatoman

Aren't literally two thirds of them appointed by Republicans?

What he's saying is that Kamala's mouth is going to backfire on her. Again.

[ranger_scout]

This judge is insane!

Judge strikes down Texas ban on drag shows, tells people offended by them ‘just don’t go’

Look at what these performers did and made kids do in a show back in 2022!

Dallas protesters show up to 'Drag the kids to pride' family-friendly drag show

[Andrew NDB]

Apparently the UN just did a big "in remembrance" thing honoring a slain Hamas commander? Is that legit?

[IMJ]

Originally Posted by ranger_scout

This judge is insane!

Judge strikes down Texas ban on drag shows, tells people offended by them ‘just don’t go’

Look at what these performers did and made kids do in a show back in 2022!

Dallas protesters show up to 'Drag the kids to pride' family-friendly drag show

I think it's easy to agree with the judge there, dude. If you aren't into it, just don't go.

But the whole "kids" thing is another story entirely worth examining. But on it's own level? People play dress-up all the time. It's their call.