Virginia Saying No To Crack - Page 3

**Jester** · 02-09-2005, 04:54 PM

Preach it!!!

愛 · 02-09-2005, 04:56 PM

I was just using that as a mold for the point I was trying to make. I know not everyone is the same way. I just find it easier to have a conversation with swear words included. What, am I not allowed to do that? I find myself to be quite intelligent, not to sound full of myself. I just don't care. I don't care what others think of me when I swear like a sailor. I'm not always thinking, "gee, I better use a more appropriate term or I might offend somebody!" I'm an offensive person, I'll admit. I just don't see the big deal here. We all talk the way we want to. There's no norm here.

I'm done with this thread. Stay on topic, fellas.

02-09-2005, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KROW

Well, I would still like to know what exactly is expressed by this low-riding pants thing. What does it mean? There needs to be proof in this pudding, otherwise the government is not going to consider this as an issue worth looking into.

I don't get it myself either...

These guys who do that look like they havent changed their diapers for a week!

**Jester** · 02-09-2005, 05:01 PM

ha....i wonder if they have a problem with women's hip huggers??

**Jo Dawn** · 02-09-2005, 05:04 PM

Ai... you can do whatever you want. Hence, the freedom of speech thing. Swearing in NO WAY (I'll say AGAIN) makes one less intelligent.

This is a topic no one will win with... everyone is different. So, whatever floats one boat.

*KROW* · 02-09-2005, 05:12 PM

You know, I kind of feel sorry I started this thread.

Weird. I start a topic on a new technology in taxi cabs, and only two people reply. I start one on underwear and the forum goes nuts.

I love you guys.

**Jo Dawn** · 02-09-2005, 05:14 PM

Hehe, oh Krow... you remember the 'underwear thread' on the GD forums and how we loved it so.

02-09-2005, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jester

ha....i wonder if they have a problem with women's hip huggers??

Hmmm... They may or may not... though I honestly don't think so...

Hip huggers are not insightly and crude looking like wearing your pants around your thighs.

Do these silly goofs with their low pants honestly think females find that attractive???

**Jo Dawn** · 02-09-2005, 05:17 PM

Here's the thing with that. They won't say anything about that if they like looking at the hiphuggers.

Totally unfair, I know, but...

And, really. DO they think they look cool with their pants all low like that? As a female, I shudder at that.

Peanut · 02-09-2005, 05:20 PM

Well obviously to the mainstream it's normal, and obviously females so entrenched in the "gangsta life style" are attracted to it. As goofy as they really do look, it's the cool thing.

**ThirdMarioBro** · 02-09-2005, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ai Takahashi

Swear words are just part of my basic conversation vocabulary. It was just all around me in school, and I have yet to rip it out. I'm an adult, anyway, and like DrSpengler said, if an adult can't handle my swear words, then that's his problem.

Well said.

*KROW* · 02-09-2005, 05:52 PM

Yes. No swearing in that post at all.

*Duke* · 02-09-2005, 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KROW

The First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or, abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or of the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Actually it isn't unconstitutional for Virginia to pass a law at all banning expressionism at all. The first admendment clearly states that Congress (the federal government) cannot make a law violating these rights. It was never intended to apply to state governments at all. The whole idea was that if Virginia or any other state passed a law against the freedom of speech then people who disagreed with these laws had the opportunity to move to another state. If the federal government passed these laws then the only choice people would have would to move to another country. Anyways that is how it was intended not how it is.

***This is not a post saying I believe the Bill of Rights should only apply to the Federal Government. I'm simply pointing out a historical fact.***

*jeff the cheff* · 02-09-2005, 08:51 PM

*That Matt Guy* · 02-09-2005, 11:13 PM

Wow, such a heated thread about butt cracks. Nobody enforces laws like this.

And it looks like I'll be moving to Europe.

**ThirdMarioBro** · 02-10-2005, 01:22 AM

Have fun. I'm diying m hair blue and heading for Japan *runs*

*edit*

Correction, the pic loaded. Hold the plane Matt

*KROW* · 02-10-2005, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duke

Actually it isn't unconstitutional for Virginia to pass a law at all banning expressionism at all. The first admendment clearly states that Congress (the federal government) cannot make a law violating these rights. It was never intended to apply to state governments at all. The whole idea was that if Virginia or any other state passed a law against the freedom of speech then people who disagreed with these laws had the opportunity to move to another state. If the federal government passed these laws then the only choice people would have would to move to another country. Anyways that is how it was intended not how it is.

*ahem*

Quote:

Originally Posted by KROW

So, no, expressionism is not in there. But, people can indeed petition this ruling to get rid of it.

Demented Utrom · 02-11-2005, 05:04 PM

Nobody wants to see a full moon during the day.

*Anarky* · 02-11-2005, 06:24 PM

And nobody wants to see your random posts neither during the day nor during the night.

Thank you for stopping that behaviour, Shredder Utrom.

**Machias Banshee** · 02-13-2005, 10:10 PM

Update!!

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...0211204334&e=5

the law was kicked out!

02-09-2005, 04:54 PM	#41
Jester Rat-faced Dude-guy Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arkansas Posts: 26,301	Preach it!!! __________________ "Clearly, you're Ninja Turtling incorrectly." - Leo656

02-09-2005, 05:01 PM	#44
Jester Rat-faced Dude-guy Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arkansas Posts: 26,301	ha....i wonder if they have a problem with women's hip huggers?? __________________ "Clearly, you're Ninja Turtling incorrectly." - Leo656

02-09-2005, 05:04 PM	#45
Jo Dawn Inactive Moderator Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Authority On All Things Don Posts: 5,190	Ai... you can do whatever you want. Hence, the freedom of speech thing. Swearing in NO WAY (I'll say AGAIN) makes one less intelligent. This is a topic no one will win with... everyone is different. So, whatever floats one boat. __________________

02-09-2005, 05:12 PM	#46
KROW Meat-n-Potatoes Man Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: State's Anus, NY Posts: 6,472	You know, I kind of feel sorry I started this thread. Weird. I start a topic on a new technology in taxi cabs, and only two people reply. I start one on underwear and the forum goes nuts. I love you guys. __________________ - Optimus Acid Trip - Cult of a Half-Shell - Raiden's Bitter Tongue - *I don't try to be funny; I fail at it naturally.*

02-09-2005, 05:14 PM	#47
Jo Dawn Inactive Moderator Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Authority On All Things Don Posts: 5,190	Hehe, oh Krow... you remember the 'underwear thread' on the GD forums and how we loved it so. __________________

02-09-2005, 04:56 PM	#42
愛 Super Moderator Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 7,449	I was just using that as a mold for the point I was trying to make. I know not everyone is the same way. I just find it easier to have a conversation with swear words included. What, am I not allowed to do that? I find myself to be quite intelligent, not to sound full of myself. I just don't care. I don't care what others think of me when I swear like a sailor. I'm not always thinking, "gee, I better use a more appropriate term or I might offend somebody!" I'm an offensive person, I'll admit. I just don't see the big deal here. We all talk the way we want to. There's no norm here. I'm done with this thread. Stay on topic, fellas.

02-09-2005, 05:17 PM	#49
Jo Dawn Inactive Moderator Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Authority On All Things Don Posts: 5,190	Here's the thing with that. They won't say anything about that if they like looking at the hiphuggers. Totally unfair, I know, but... And, really. DO they think they look cool with their pants all low like that? As a female, I shudder at that. __________________

02-09-2005, 05:20 PM	#50
Peanut Second Gear Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The New World Posts: 15,422	Well obviously to the mainstream it's normal, and obviously females so entrenched in the "gangsta life style" are attracted to it. As goofy as they really do look, it's the cool thing.

02-09-2005, 05:52 PM	#52
KROW Meat-n-Potatoes Man Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: State's Anus, NY Posts: 6,472	Yes. No swearing in that post at all. __________________ - Optimus Acid Trip - Cult of a Half-Shell - Raiden's Bitter Tongue - *I don't try to be funny; I fail at it naturally.*

02-09-2005, 08:51 PM	#54
jeff the cheff Mad Scientist Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: 122 and an eighth Posts: 2,129

02-09-2005, 11:13 PM	#55
That Matt Guy Honey Bunches Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Lone Star State Posts: 5,840	Wow, such a heated thread about butt cracks. Nobody enforces laws like this. And it looks like I'll be moving to Europe.

02-10-2005, 01:22 AM	#56
ThirdMarioBro Tea Time! Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 8,905	Have fun. I'm diying m hair blue and heading for Japan runs edit Correction, the pic loaded. Hold the plane Matt __________________

02-11-2005, 05:04 PM	#58
Demented Utrom Hench Mutant Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 474	Nobody wants to see a full moon during the day.

02-11-2005, 06:24 PM	#59
Anarky Outlaw Hero Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Tannhauser Gate Posts: 4,867	And nobody wants to see your random posts neither during the day nor during the night. Thank you for stopping that behaviour, Shredder Utrom. __________________ Because it's... I dunno... brutal.

02-13-2005, 10:10 PM	#60
Machias Banshee Super Moderator Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 17,163	Update!! http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...0211204334&e=5 the law was kicked out!