Kung Fu Panda

[Drtooth]

I don't know.... I have to say Dreamworks comes in a very distant second after Pixar for best CGI studio. i like Blue Sky's stuff, but the stories seem uneven (though I LOVE LOVE LOVE robots) and Sony should just stay the hell away from the medium all together.

So it could either be a decent little enjoyable film, or a total "Let's see how many celebrities we can cram into our film" piece of Sharktale.

Honestly, out of all of them, I'm both looking forward and worrying about this one... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagas...e_Crate_Escape I liked the original, but I don't know about a sequel...

I find it disheartening that TMNT 2 is fighting for its life in some studio exec's office while Dreamworks has already got Puss in Boots: The Story of an Ogre Killer greenlit for 2011.

are you serious? Are you serious? Really? You mean that one studio that doesn't know how to get another film to work since it was over shadowed by a crappy Disney film and Will Ferrel pushing the bounds of Homoerotisism and acting like a total D-bag, and another studio is milking the closest thing it has to Mickey mouse?

How long have you been following Hollywood for? 2 weeks? This is the same industry that keeps pooping out Resident Evil movies, dispite the fact no one likes them. These are the people who feel they should just remake Porky's and Animal House over and over again, but give them new shiney titles like "Van Wilder." The ones that make terrible Hip Hop remakes of classic films and then makes sequals to them.

That said, I do not see why TMNT 2 can't be made, as it made a snot load of money in merchandising. And when it all comes down to that, that's all a movie needs.

But as for more Shrek films, 3 was plenty. in fact it was actually overdoing it. The Third one was enjoyable, but not half as good as the others. And I still think monsters Inc was robbed. if the Oscar doesn't go to Ratatoullie, Paprika, or TMNT (bit of a stretch, I know) and goes to anything Dreamworks made, they erred.