The Technodrome Forums

Go Back   The Technodrome Forums > General Forums > General Discussion > TV and Movies

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2008, 05:04 PM   #21
愛
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,449
Oh man, for once I laughed at a Doom joke. Kudos.
愛 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 05:28 PM   #22
Peanut
Second Gear
 
Peanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The New World
Posts: 15,422
Firstly, Doom, that was f*cking hilarious.

And now on to our local doctor. My problems with your initially retarded post are THUS...

Microsoft has absolutely ZERO to do with the HD Format war. Not only do they have NOTHING to do with HD-DVD, which is a Toshiba created format, but the 360 didn't even have any type of HD format solutions UNTIL ALMOST A YEAR after launch. Microsoft has NO STAKE in the format wars, and Bill Gates has even gone on to say that while they're honoring their friendship with Toshiba by backing HD-DVD first, if Blu-Ray becomes the clear winner, Microsoft won't have a problem backing that either. The HD format wars have NOTHING TO DO with the console wars, but because Sony decided to throw it in the PS3, fanboys and ignorant fools alike have decided that it's part of our industry now, which it isn't.

Next, what console had faulty wiring at launch? Are you just pulling sh*t from the sky here? The original Xbox had 3 cases of power bricks smoking, which turned into a huge thing that people still don't understand, but saying people don't buy consoles at first because they have faulty wiring? Where the f*ck does this come from!?

And last but not least are your views on the HD format in general. First, who the f*ck ever said that a movie being in HD made it good? NO ONE! Bad movies are bad, so your examples of White Chicks and Norbit are completely f*cking retarded. However, good movies with terrific HD transfers are made all the better with the superior picture and sound, and trust me, it IS superior.

And exactly how expensive do you think this sh*t is? My mom and myself bought my dad an entire setup for Christmas. This included a 52" Sony Bravia, a huge wireless Pioneer 5.1 surround sound system, and an HD-DVD player, along with all the cables and a year of HD satellite and it cost is around $2,200 CDN. Now, I don't know what kind of town you come from, but where I'm from, $2,200 for an amazing HD setup isn't bank breaking. It's a lot of money, but I can assure you that neither of us will spend the next 5 years paying it off, and neither of our credit cards are maxed out.

Get a clue, or get out.
Peanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 05:42 PM   #23
Mecha Cow
Gorgeous and modest too
 
Mecha Cow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,699
Quote:
I'd rather play my movies, right guys?
Good show, old boy. Good show.
__________________
Mecha Cow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 06:00 PM   #24
Jester
Rat-faced Dude-guy
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 26,301
I guess if I watched movies somewhere other than my room, I'd be more inclined to actually upgrade from my tube TV and DVD player to an HD setup.
__________________

"Clearly, you're Ninja Turtling incorrectly." - Leo656
Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 06:44 PM   #25
Mr. Snackpants
Keep cool my babies!
 
Mr. Snackpants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mount Pleasant
Posts: 2,239
I put my HD DVD drive and 4 movies on ebay this past weekend. I got almost $150, I'm ok with that. My mom took back a couple HD DVDs she got me for Christmas. So I have about $250 to put towards a PS3 for Blu Ray.
Mr. Snackpants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 07:11 PM   #26
Mandi-chan
Stone Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 932
Yeah, I never got the big deal about High-Def/Blue-Ray.

Personally, I think normal dvds are good enough.

I'll admit, with King Kong there was a more noticeable difference in quality (the High-Def does look a little better...just not enough for me to run out and buy a new player when my regular works just fine)...but the older movies that have been "converted" to High-Def didn't look any different to me at all.

I'm glad to see that the big war is over though, even though I didn't really care about it. I was sick of hearing about it from my mom (she's more into tech stuff than I am).

I'll stick with the regular dvds until they stop making them.
Mandi-chan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 07:12 PM   #27
GK Punk
I'm your Devil
 
GK Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drtooth View Post
Pardon me for not having rich parents, a decent job or credit cards I want to maxx out and have to spend the rest of my life paying the hell off.
You are really exaggerating the cost here. I Don't have rich parents, nor a decent job and credit cards (In fact, no credit cards.) And I have an HD TV. And seriously the difference is large. You may not think it is, but trust me.
GK Punk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 07:15 PM   #28
Jester
Rat-faced Dude-guy
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 26,301
GK, do you have this as part of an entertainment center or is it one you have in your bed room?
__________________

"Clearly, you're Ninja Turtling incorrectly." - Leo656
Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 07:20 PM   #29
GK Punk
I'm your Devil
 
GK Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,439
I actually have one in my room. I tend to watch movies more in bed than anywhere else.
GK Punk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:02 PM   #30
Cure
Y'all need Jesus
 
Cure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,938
Mine is in my room, too. Only about $330.
__________________
Cure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:30 PM   #31
Dr. Doom
Allons-y!
 
Dr. Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Castle Doom
Posts: 4,535
I've been wanting to get a really nice monitor to use for gaming, TV, movies and whatever else, as well as computer type stuff. I think I came to the conclusion taht this would be the cheapest and easiest way to have an HD-type setup. I guess that would severely cut down on my multi-tasking though.
__________________
Dr. Doom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:43 PM   #32
Peanut
Second Gear
 
Peanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The New World
Posts: 15,422
F*ck!

Looks like everyone spoke to soon. Paramount has denied the claims and says they, along with Universal, are still behind HD-DVD. It's going to continue, folks.
Peanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:47 PM   #33
GK Punk
I'm your Devil
 
GK Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,439
It's all a matter of time anyway I think.
GK Punk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:50 PM   #34
Peanut
Second Gear
 
Peanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The New World
Posts: 15,422
You'd think so, but the longer this drags out the worse it gets. It just needs to be over.
Peanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 10:02 PM   #35
Leonardo Mystic
Stone Warrior
 
Leonardo Mystic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 904
I really don't care one way or another what kind of formats exist as long as I can buy my favorite movie and play it. All I know the difference in is price, and that I have a plain, ordinary DVD player and 19" television.

The kind of money you guys talk about spending for an HD setup? It'd take me three months worth of paychecks to have that kind of money. IF I didn't have something called, oh, bills? Like a car payment, gas to put in that car, insurance, cell phone, food to eat, and just enough to tuck away for emergencies and rainy days, which do happen. And I work hard at my job, lousy as it is, to earn it all.

My family isn't poor by any means, they're middle-class, but they could never afford to buy anything like that on their income. They have to eat and live too.

All I'm getting at is you're being completely unfair and condescending to those who simply don't understand what the big deal is, and don't have the money to invest on these kinds of things like all you lords of the electronic world. That's what Dr. Tooth is saying. More than likely not because he's jealous, but because he has more important things on his agenda than worrying what kind of formatted entertainment system he has in his living room or whether or not it's big enough to see from the front yard window.
__________________

Leonardo Mystic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 10:28 PM   #36
Jester
Rat-faced Dude-guy
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 26,301
This thread is starting to remind me of the Weird Al Song "Frank's 2000' TV."
__________________

"Clearly, you're Ninja Turtling incorrectly." - Leo656
Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 10:32 PM   #37
GK Punk
I'm your Devil
 
GK Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,439
or maybe, because posts like his, and yours, is condescending to those of us who DO care? If your point is that you "Can't afford it and don't care" then why bother posting in the thread? If you don't care, you wouldn't say anything. That's what not caring is.

Yeah buying one new TV last year really means I'm a "Lord of the electronic world" and means I have cash to throw around on whatever I want. Sure. That also explains why the TV I replaced was over 15 years old and out right died so I had to replace it.

Yep, That's me. condescending lord of the electronic world.
GK Punk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 10:33 PM   #38
Peanut
Second Gear
 
Peanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The New World
Posts: 15,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonardo Mystic View Post
All I'm getting at is you're being completely unfair and condescending to those who simply don't understand what the big deal is, and don't have the money to invest on these kinds of things like all you lords of the electronic world. That's what Dr. Tooth is saying. More than likely not because he's jealous, but because he has more important things on his agenda than worrying what kind of formatted entertainment system he has in his living room or whether or not it's big enough to see from the front yard window.
If you can't afford to spend $2,000 once every 8-10 or even 15 years, you're not middle-class. Sorry, but it's true. It's not like those of us with HD setups are running out and buying a new TV every other year. And Tooth is getting the hate because he came out and balked about something he doesn't understand. If you don't know sh*t, don't say sh*t. Simple as that.
Peanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 10:35 PM   #39
GK Punk
I'm your Devil
 
GK Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,439
I didn't even pay that much... a couple hundred dollars (Closer to 400) over the course of a few months on a debit card.
GK Punk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 10:36 PM   #40
Peanut
Second Gear
 
Peanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The New World
Posts: 15,422
Which is exactly my point. I got an entire HD setup for just over $2,000. People act like HDTV's still cost that much ALONE. You can get a great HDTV for beans now.
Peanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.