Will Smith slaps Chris Rock at Oscars

[Coola Yagami]

Originally Posted by Leo656

Doing a little more detective work, we can assume Jada didn't end up with Tupac because SHE probably didn't want him to f*ck all the many women he was f*cking (but she most likely wanted to be free to f*ck as many guys as she wanted). And he was probably like, "F*ck that, I can get any woman I want, if you're screwing around then so am I" and so the whole thing went no further. But yeah, it's clear who she WISHED she'd ended up with, if she'd had her way.

Typical modern day hoe. She wants to sleep around but it's a problem if her guy does it.

[Prowler]

If people want to sleep around... why even get in a relationship? I thought the point of a relationship was precisely becoming exclusive to that person?

I don't believe in open relationships. I don't care that there might 4 or 5 successful ones. The vast majority can't be. And if they are... then that's not love. That's two people who just happen to have sex together occasionally.

[Coola Yagami]

Originally Posted by Prowler

If people want to sleep around... why even get in a relationship? I thought the point of a relationship was precisely becoming exclusive to that person?

I don't believe in open relationships. I don't care that there might 4 or 5 successful ones. The vast majority can't be. And if they are... then that's not love. That's two people who just happen to have sex together occasionally.

Because of everything else. They want a relationship where the guy provides the girl with everything, buying her stuff, paying for dinners, taking her to new places, etc. They just don't want to understand that all of that comes with being faithful. They want their guy to give them everything and still sleep around. That's why some get so upset when caught, not cause they broke their man's heart, but because their free ride is over.

Like Jada wants all the money, fame, big fancy house, etc, everything a woman would get by being married to someone like Will Smith.... But still sleep around.

[Anarchistguy]

Originally Posted by Prowler

I don't believe in open relationships. I don't care that there might 4 or 5 successful ones. The vast majority can't be. And if they are... then that's not love. That's two people who just happen to have sex together occasionally.

Exactly. I don't believe in them either.

Open relationships: asking permission to cheat.

That's why some get so upset when caught, not cause they broke their man's heart, but because their free ride is over.

Precisely! There's no remorse. They only feel bad because they got caught!

[Andrew NDB]

Pretty much. Getting in a relationship is basically "You agree not to see anyone else as long as I promise to do the same? OK, deal!"

Because otherwise you're just buddies.

[Coola Yagami]

Originally Posted by Anarchistguy

Exactly. I don't believe it either.

Open relationships: asking permission to cheat.

And then it's a problem if the other partner also now wants permission to cheat.

Despite it being 'open' one partner always benefits more than the other. Usually the problems start once the one with the shorter end of the stick finally wakes up.

[Anarchistguy]

Originally Posted by Coola Yagami

And then it's a problem if the other partner also now wants permission to cheat.

Despite it being 'open' one partner always benefits more than the other. Usually the problems start once the one with the shorter end of the stick finally wakes up.

That's because these so-called open relationships rarely benefit both parties. They're not actually about exploration, adventure or being open-minded. There's always a selfish motive involved...

[AquaParade]

I'm sure for some people it works. Most people would feel jealous or possessive, myself included, but not everyone is wired that way.

I hear you guys though. I've seen the wrong side of it with my own two eyes. My buddies wife cheated on him - with the best man - which led to the "solution" of an open-relationship, which went how one might expect - she got some and he didn't.
Then they divorced.

[Coola Yagami]

Originally Posted by Anarchistguy

That's because these so-called open relationships rarely benefit both parties. They're not actually about exploration, adventure or being open-minded. There's always a selfish motive involved...

Ah but you see, there's the rub. Usually one person tries to sell it as exploration and whatever else and the other person is either too stupid or too much of a soyboy little bitch to actually stand up and say 'hell no'.

Eventually the idiot will either wake up and be like 'hey wait a minute....' or will finally find his balls and end it.

Most of the time it's a woman and 2 guys combo. You very rarely find a guy with 2 women unless the women are bi bordering on gay where the poor guy is just watching.

Women would rather be 'the side chick' to a married guy than actually openly share him with someone in a so-called open relationship.

Of course all my examples are in the 'not all' category. I'm sure there might be one girl ok with 2 guys, though usually the guys are bi and they **** each other as much as they **** the girl. It's when everyone is straight that's the problem. Eventually jealousy will rear its ugly head.

[Anarchistguy]

Some women would rather share a player than have a loser to themselves. It's pretty crazy

[Anarchistguy]

(Please disregard this double reply)

[Coola Yagami]

Originally Posted by Anarchistguy

Some women would rather share a player than have a loser to themselves. It's pretty crazy

True that. Everyone would rather share a winner than date a loser.

All these women can't be that dumb, most must subconsciously know that Mr Moneybags is never going to leave his wife. They just don't want the thrill to end and lie to themselves as much as they need to.

[Anarchistguy]

Originally Posted by Coola Yagami

True that. Everyone would rather share a winner than date a loser.

All these women can't be that dumb, most must subconsciously know that Mr Moneybags is never going to leave his wife. They just don't want the thrill to end and lie to themselves as much as they need to.

When the wake up call comes...it's gonna hurt like hell to them.

[Prowler]

Now I'm sure someone will come ITT to lecture us on how "humans aren't meant to be monogamous creatures".

Well, humans are animals but we're rational ones. Otherwise why would we have society norms and rules? Why do we stand in line waiting for our turn instead of fighting each other to death and adopt a winner takes all approach?

So yeah, don't give me that BS argument please.

It's funny because defending people sleeping around seems like a way to bring society back to the 50s. Difference being, back then men were the ones who had mistresses, while nowadays it seems like some young women want it to be their turn to have lovers and chest in their husbands.

A lot of the people who demand equality don't actually want it. They are just saying "now it's our turn!"
It goes for all sort of activists, whether it's feminazis or BLM.

[Anarchistguy]

Originally Posted by Prowler

Now I'm sure someone will come ITT to lecture us on how "humans aren't meant to be monogamous creatures".

Well, humans are animals but we're rational ones. Otherwise why would we have society norms and rules? Why do we stand in line waiting for our turn instead of fighting each other to death and adopt a winner takes all approach?

So yeah, don't give me that BS argument please.

It's funny because defending people sleeping around seems like a way to bring society back to the 50s. Difference being, back then men were the ones who had mistresses, while nowadays it seems like some young women want it to be their turn to have lovers and chest in their husbands.

A lot of the people who demand equality don't actually want it. They are just saying "now it's our turn!"
It goes for all sort of activists, whether it's feminazis or BLM.

For the most part, feminism today isn't about equality. It's about usurping and diminishing men.

[Andrew NDB]

Originally Posted by Anarchistguy

For the most part, feminism today isn't about equality. It's about usurping and diminishing men.

The opposite. Replacing women with men, who can be better women. Apparently.

[ZariusTwo]

Ten year ban

https://news.sky.com/story/will-smit...stage-12584147

[Leo656]

Yikes!

...Maybe he should come out and admit it was all a work to sell a few more tickets to Chris Rock's shows, huh?

Seriously though, that's a bit harsh. I honestly expected that him resigning in advance would mitigate some of the punishment, but I guess I can see the Academy's point. He technically committed misdemeanor assault on their stage at the biggest awards show of the year and in so doing made a mockery of the entire event for years to come.

10 years though? At his age and ever-decreasing relevance he's basically been banned from ever winning an Oscar again, or at least accepting one in person. Seems a bit excessive. But then I slap lots of people for lots of reasons so my personal views on how far is "too far" are probably skewed.

Many people and entertainers are pointing out that the radio silence from Jada is deafening. This is ALL her fault for emasculating Will to the point where he felt he had to "reclaim his manhood" and look where it got him. And her? She's on camera laughing as it happened. Yet not a single word on the subject from her. What a trash human being.

[DarkFell]

Ten years of no entry from The Oscars should give Will plenty of time to get his head cleared, and for him to decide on what to do about his marriage issue.

Maybe, it's also a much needed break from the public.

[Prowler]

Not to mention the Academy seems inconsistent. I mean, did they ever wipe the names of the likes of Roman Polanski and Harvey Weinstein off the Oscar winners records? And are they banned from ever attending the cerimony again? What they did wa such worse than what Will Smith did. Even though Will Smith did it in public and during the ceremony, it's not like he's getting in legla2 trouble for doing it since Chris Rock did not press charges on him.