28 Weeks Later

*Spitfire* · 01-31-2006, 07:41 PM

I was looking up movie stuff and I came across this
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0463854/

Now this site probly isn't always 100% correct but yeah. I'm excited still ^_^ I loved 28 Days Later. The infected ruled in that movie. Way better then any zombie. I wonder what it's all about. It doesn't say much in the description.

~~Turtledude2k3~~ · 01-31-2006, 09:07 PM

I believe it's the sequal to 28 days later.
Not sure but this is just a good guess.

Remember what happened at the end of 28 days later?

Jo269976 · 02-05-2006, 08:36 AM

I don't think 28 Days Later needs a sequel, the story is kinda finished at the end, all of Britain is dead and most of the world could be too
unless it was different characters i don't think it should be made

Peanut · 02-05-2006, 09:48 AM

Am I the only one who thought 28 Days Later got so horrificly bad after the father died? I found it almost impossible to watch.

*cqb101* · 02-05-2006, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peanut

Am I the only one who thought 28 Days Later got so horrificly bad after the father died? I found it almost impossible to watch.

The ending in the military compound is my favorite part.

**Barkworm** · 02-05-2006, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peanut

Am I the only one who thought 28 Days Later got so horrificly bad after the father died? I found it almost impossible to watch.

I was hoping it would be... you know, scary?! Instead it was just boring. I liked the mood of the movie though.

Peanut · 02-05-2006, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cqb101

The ending in the military compound is my favorite part.

Really? I thought the movie got a bit too creepy in that part. The whole "I can't wait to rape this 13 year old girl" thing kind of made me sick. I'm not into that stuff. As far as zombie movies go, if that's what you can call the things in this movie, I thought it was alright. There are definately others I enjoy 100x more than this one.

*damnhooligan* · 02-05-2006, 10:47 AM

I remember catching the first one on TV a while ago and I had no idea what movie it was, but I was digging it. Only after a quick IMBD search did I learn it was 28 Days Later. From the trailors, it always looked like a standard BOO!/zombies out of nowhere/token black guy is the first to die sort of scary movie. Instead, it was plotting, suspenseful and had amazing character depth. I loved how the movie ended. Even though it the story was unresolved at the end, I felt rather satisfied. I was also thoroughly creeped the hell out.

With that said, I really like the idea of a sequel. I'd always wondered "What about the rest of the world? What happened with them?" and I think that'd make a great tangent to go off on.

*Spitfire* · 02-05-2006, 03:38 PM

I assume that's what it's about, I think it mentions the US and what happened there.

*Anarky* · 02-05-2006, 04:14 PM

I see it coming "28 days later: Faroe Fatalities" or "28 days later: Manila Mayhem" or "28 days later: the Kopenhagen killings"... some movies just don't need a sequel, despite the fact that there could be one.

*Sewer Bull* · 02-05-2006, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anarky

I see it coming "28 days later: Faroe Fatalities" or "28 days later: Manila Mayhem" or "28 days later: the Kopenhagen killings"... some movies just don't need a sequel, despite the fact that there could be one.

"28 days later: Gallen Gore"

*Anarky* · 02-06-2006, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sewer Bull

"28 days later: Gallen Gore"

"28 days later: St. Gallen Splatter" would be for me, Mr. "28 days later: Warsaw Warzone".

*Duke* · 02-06-2006, 01:55 PM

I really don't think this movie warrents a sequel but to tell the truth i don't think most movies warrent a sequel.

*Spitfire* · 02-07-2006, 09:35 AM

To be honest I can't say I'm excited about it. I just happened to come across and posted it since I just saw 28 Days Later recently. Your right they couldn't make a sequel unless they show what happened in other parts of the world. But I don't see how it could be the same. Oh well, Hollywood and everyone els eare out of ideas. Remakes and sequels are the future of movies -_-

01-31-2006, 07:41 PM	#1
Spitfire Writer • Director Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 12,035	28 Weeks Later I was looking up movie stuff and I came across this http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0463854/ Now this site probly isn't always 100% correct but yeah. I'm excited still ^_^ I loved 28 Days Later. The infected ruled in that movie. Way better then any zombie. I wonder what it's all about. It doesn't say much in the description. __________________ Check out my online portfolio http://www.christopherpelletier.com/

02-05-2006, 08:36 AM	#3
Jo269976 Stone Warrior Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Arkham Asylum Posts: 592	I don't think 28 Days Later needs a sequel, the story is kinda finished at the end, all of Britain is dead and most of the world could be too unless it was different characters i don't think it should be made __________________

02-05-2006, 10:47 AM	#8
damnhooligan Mad Scientist Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Dorksville, USA Posts: 1,745	I remember catching the first one on TV a while ago and I had no idea what movie it was, but I was digging it. Only after a quick IMBD search did I learn it was 28 Days Later. From the trailors, it always looked like a standard BOO!/zombies out of nowhere/token black guy is the first to die sort of scary movie. Instead, it was plotting, suspenseful and had amazing character depth. I loved how the movie ended. Even though it the story was unresolved at the end, I felt rather satisfied. I was also thoroughly creeped the hell out. With that said, I really like the idea of a sequel. I'd always wondered "What about the rest of the world? What happened with them?" and I think that'd make a great tangent to go off on. __________________

02-05-2006, 03:38 PM	#9
Spitfire Writer • Director Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 12,035	I assume that's what it's about, I think it mentions the US and what happened there. __________________ Check out my online portfolio http://www.christopherpelletier.com/

02-05-2006, 04:14 PM	#10
Anarky Outlaw Hero Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Tannhauser Gate Posts: 4,867	I see it coming "28 days later: Faroe Fatalities" or "28 days later: Manila Mayhem" or "28 days later: the Kopenhagen killings"... some movies just don't need a sequel, despite the fact that there could be one. __________________ Because it's... I dunno... brutal.

01-31-2006, 09:07 PM	#2
~~Turtledude2k3~~ Banned Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Canada, BC Posts: 783	I believe it's the sequal to 28 days later. Not sure but this is just a good guess. Remember what happened at the end of 28 days later?

02-05-2006, 09:48 AM	#4
Peanut Second Gear Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The New World Posts: 15,422	Am I the only one who thought 28 Days Later got so horrificly bad after the father died? I found it almost impossible to watch.

02-06-2006, 01:55 PM	#13
Duke Mad Scientist Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 1,913	I really don't think this movie warrents a sequel but to tell the truth i don't think most movies warrent a sequel.

02-07-2006, 09:35 AM	#14
Spitfire Writer • Director Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 12,035	To be honest I can't say I'm excited about it. I just happened to come across and posted it since I just saw 28 Days Later recently. Your right they couldn't make a sequel unless they show what happened in other parts of the world. But I don't see how it could be the same. Oh well, Hollywood and everyone els eare out of ideas. Remakes and sequels are the future of movies -_- __________________ Check out my online portfolio http://www.christopherpelletier.com/