Batman '89

*ZariusTwo* · 03-09-2016, 02:49 PM

Last year, DC actually turned down a series based off the Burton Bat-films

http://joequinones.blogspot.co.uk/20...batman-89.html

*CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy* · 03-09-2016, 02:54 PM

Wouldn't have been interested at all.

The Ivy concept looks good, though. The hood is a cool touch.

*Autbot_Benz* · 03-09-2016, 02:59 PM

as a huge fan of the Burton movies I would have loved to see this happen.

*plastroncafe* · 03-09-2016, 03:05 PM

With Billy Dee as Dent and Two-Face.
Bold.

*Spike Spiegel* · 03-09-2016, 03:05 PM

Would have liked to see this. Ah, well.

Anybody know if Robin might have been modeled after anyone in particular? I know Marlon Wayans was supposed to play the character, but it doesn't exactly look like him.

*Krutch* · 03-09-2016, 03:14 PM

Never seeing Billy Dee as Two Face is one of the biggest tragedies known to man.

*Candy Kappa* · 03-09-2016, 03:24 PM

Just Billy Dee as Two-Face should have warranted a ongoing series, damn that artwork is nice.

*TurtleTitan97* · 03-09-2016, 03:25 PM

Well that sucks.

*DarkFell* · 03-09-2016, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZariusTwo

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CIdECjKwv...9f2o1_1280.jpg

Last year, DC actually turned down a series based off the Burton Bat-films

http://joequinones.blogspot.co.uk/20...batman-89.html

I really liked the first movie as a kid. The other films were sorta 'meh' to me, but they did have their moments.

Even though I'm not a huge DC fan, I would have liked to see this idea happen.

*NormalGamer* · 03-09-2016, 04:59 PM

Wow. A very missed opportunity for DC.

The Turtle Terminator · 03-09-2016, 05:10 PM

Would've subscribed to this and it's a wasted opportunity for dc

*myconius* · 03-14-2016, 11:32 PM

i subscribed to Batman 66.
it was really good at first but went south fast, and became just another Batman title in an already flooded market.

i can see this being good for 3-6 issues depending if this is actually what the interior art looked like and not just cover art?

still though, i'd rather have had an actual Tim Burton sequel than just a "what if it had never ended" comic series. they tend to run out of workable material fast!

~~Sumac~~ · 03-15-2016, 10:07 AM

Good and fun idea shot down by DC?
Why I am not surprised...*sigh*

It's like they hate fun stuff.

*CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy* · 03-15-2016, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sumac

Good and fun idea shot down by DC?
Why I am not surprised...*sigh*

It's like they hate fun stuff.

They don't hate fun... they've given us Lobdell's "Red Hood & the Outlaws" and Nocenti's "Catwoman!"

*myconius* · 03-15-2016, 10:20 AM

wouldn't they have to get permission from all the actors for use of their likenesses?

*MikeandRaph87* · 03-15-2016, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy

Wouldn't have been interested at all.

The Ivy concept looks good, though. The hood is a cool touch.

Agree 100% on every word.

And you said we don't agree on anything.

*CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy* · 03-15-2016, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeandRaph87

Agree 100% on every word.

And you said we don't agree on anything.

We agree on like 50% of what we discuss.

Daredevil, IDW TMNT, 50% Batman preferences...

03-09-2016, 02:49 PM	#1
ZariusTwo Overlord Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Britain, DINO THUNDER...POWER UP! Posts: 22,491	Batman '89 Last year, DC actually turned down a series based off the Burton Bat-films http://joequinones.blogspot.co.uk/20...batman-89.html __________________ Spider-Man: The Rescue Spider-Man: The Galloping Cat Spider-Man: Scarlet Mirror Doctor Who: Child of the Daleks

03-09-2016, 02:54 PM	#2
CylonsKlingonsDaleksOhMy Annalist Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 16,435	Wouldn't have been interested at all. The Ivy concept looks good, though. The hood is a cool touch. __________________ *ALL THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED*

03-09-2016, 02:59 PM	#3
Autbot_Benz Hellblazer Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Ventura California Posts: 9,190	as a huge fan of the Burton movies I would have loved to see this happen. __________________ I respect what FW cartoon did for the turtles franchise but it is the most overrated and hard to watch of the 3 turtles cartoons.

03-09-2016, 03:24 PM	#7
Candy Kappa The Agenda of Existing Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Vikingland Posts: 14,596	Just Billy Dee as Two-Face should have warranted a ongoing series, damn that artwork is nice. __________________ devianArt Instagram Youtube Tumblr Art Blog Patreon

03-09-2016, 03:25 PM	#8
TurtleTitan97 Space Cowboy Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Speed Force Posts: 7,043	Well that sucks. __________________

03-09-2016, 03:14 PM	#6
Krutch Like, stupid rich. Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: The Rawkzone Posts: 2,808	Never seeing Billy Dee as Two Face is one of the biggest tragedies known to man.

03-09-2016, 04:59 PM	#10
NormalGamer Random Punk Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 43	Wow. A very missed opportunity for DC.

03-09-2016, 05:10 PM	#11
The Turtle Terminator Mad Scientist Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,110	Would've subscribed to this and it's a wasted opportunity for dc __________________

03-14-2016, 11:32 PM	#12
myconius Abby Normal Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: the grave marked "Unknown" right beside Arch Stanton. Posts: 2,857	i subscribed to Batman 66. it was really good at first but went south fast, and became just another Batman title in an already flooded market. i can see this being good for 3-6 issues depending if this is actually what the interior art looked like and not just cover art? still though, i'd rather have had an actual Tim Burton sequel than just a "what if it had never ended" comic series. they tend to run out of workable material fast! __________________

03-15-2016, 10:07 AM	#13
~~Sumac~~ Banned Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 6,129	Good and fun idea shot down by DC? Why I am not surprised...sigh It's like they hate fun stuff.

03-15-2016, 10:20 AM	#15
myconius Abby Normal Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: the grave marked "Unknown" right beside Arch Stanton. Posts: 2,857	wouldn't they have to get permission from all the actors for use of their likenesses? __________________