Celebrity discussion and bitching thread

[Davetello]

Originally Posted by Ninjinister

Less than zero people care about your hard-on of hate for Peanut. By continuing to follow him around the site and harassing him, you are violating the Malicious Communications Act of 1988 as well as the Protection from Harassment Act of 1997. And these are just two that I know from work; you may be violating several more laws both in your own country and his, and depending on what side of the bed an official has found him or herself on this morning, it could be construed as an act of terrorism.

Reign it in and stop being a bully.

Look, look, little man, it's nice that you and Peanut are part of the old-school crowd, so therefore you'll back him up, but the guy can defend himself. And, going by the PMs I've received about him, I'd say quite a lot of people care about my supposed 'hard-on' for him.

Bullies pick on innocent people. Peanut brings it on himself by coming into threads and leaving judgemental attacks on people. Something you haven't condemned him for, unsurprisingly. He deserves everything he gets because he's far, far from innocent. I attacked him because he attacked me and anyone who was posting in this thread. It's not my fault that you're too stupid to understand that attacking the room generally is just as bad as singling someone out - in fact it's worse because it displays cowardice and an inability to confront someone head on. I don't follow him around - I pick out the holes in his nonsense when he makes a judgemental post, or argues via logical fallacies. That's not bullying you moron.

Threatening me with legal action? Truly desperate While we're at it we better alert the Canadian authorities to what Peanut head has been up to himself.

As for bullying, have you seen what Peanut has got up to in the past? He displays all of the classic hallmarks of being a bully. I won't rest until he sorts his behaviour out. Other people let him get away with his disgusting behaviour, either because they're too scared of him or because they're pacifists who wish to avoid drama. I give him it back and then some because tools like him need telling.

"An act of terrorism" rofl. Are you really this pathetic? Are you this desperate for Peanut to not be pulled up on his nonsense? Saying this could be construed as terrorism actually makes light of terrorism. Do you have any idea of how pathetic you sound? Seriously, read that back. I now know why you wear ninja costumes - you ramble such inanities that you can't even bear to look at your face in the mirror. I also like that you're happy to accept officials abusing their power based on their mood (side of bed they got out of). Corrupt people like you are everything that's wrong with society. No wonder you're in the law profession. Morals of an alley cat.

This has fvck all to do with you so get out of my sight you double digit IQ troglodyte.

[Davetello]

By the way, how is it possible for 'less than zero' people to care about something (and the correct grammar is 'fewer' by the way, not 'less')?

Seems like your arithmetic skills are on par with your perceptiveness and understanding of psychology. Stick to posting cringeworthy photos dressed as a ninja and leave the debate to the intellects. Clown.

Choosing this topic as evidence of me 'following him around'. Despite the fact that I was posting in here long before he showed up, and I only replied because his post was antagonistic. We're dealing with a real bright spark here. A ****ing future MENSA member.

[Davetello]

Originally Posted by Peanut

lol. Why you keep turning everything into a battle over perceived levels of education is confusing as sh*t.

Because you're a dummy yet you have the audacity to take me on. And if you're going to use terminology such as 'presenting cases', I'm going to explain that it's wholly out of your league. Stick to the video games ffs, you're out of your depth here. Why bother? You know, I know, and everyone else here knows that I can destroy you in any argument, and have done so repeatedly. You moan about the perceived state of this section whilst making zero attempt to improve it - you barely even post here, you just moan about how bad it apparently is. I would accept that if you were creating thoughtful threads which were being constantly overlooked, but that's not the case here. Shut the fvck up with your whinging - you have no right to do it until you make an effort to improve things yourself. That won't happen though because you have no depth.

[Candy Kappa]

Chill on the double posting, edit button is there for a reason.

[Davetello]

Originally Posted by Candy Kappa

Chill on the double posting, edit button is there for a reason.

Considering there are edit tags under my posts, it's clear that I know that. The double post was to split up a lengthy post and to add more effect to the second one. The third post was because I didn't see Peanut's post until after I replied to the other moron and I am unaware of how to edit to multi-quote numerous people.

The guy obviously doesn't know what a bully is, either. I'm the antithesis of a bully, as I only target bullies themselves. Bullies are people who pick on innocent individuals who are scared of the bully and others. How many bully victims do you know who walk into a crowd of people and make unprovoked aggressive proclamations? The real life equivalent of what Powder has done here? That's right, none.

For this A grade imbecile to call me the bully whilst refusing to castigate Peanut...well, it actually has me seething. It's completely and utterly intellectually dishonest. I can't work out if he knows this but wants to defend Peanut and throw me to the dogs, or if he's just thick. Probably a combination of the two.

Either way, I'm getting a bit sick of the old-school lot on here who will defend one another and treat the likes of myself and others by harsher standards than peanut, cure etc simply because we're not part of their little clique. The pair of them get away with murder just because they're long-term on here and friends with the mods. If they signed up to a random site where they were unknowns and posted this way it wouldn't be fvcking tolerated, which is probably why they stay here and pollute the place with their garbage - because they know every other site would punt them within weeks. The sooner idiots like Peanut realise that they don't own the site, that they're not more important than the person who signed up five minutes ago, and that the site will never go back to the small, tight group it was in 2001, the better. The pr!ck doesn't even like the turtles any more ffs! Fvck off.

[plastroncafe]

And the most important, yet unmentioned, factor:

To up your own post count to lend your diatribes some sort of artificial legitimacy.

[pandaderek]

People, who judge others, based on the worst thing that they've, ever, done, are people who, just, want to feel good about themselves. They want to have some mentality that they're so different and "better" than those people; they allow any one incident to define a person, as a whole.

Also, I'm not saying that people shouldn't be chastised for what they say and do, but, should, also, be given a chance to redeem their qualities. They shouldn't be criticized for being an idiot, in the past, when they're, currently, wiser and fulfilled their obligation to reconcile with their problems from that past.

[Commenter 42]

Originally Posted by plastroncafe

And the most important, yet unmentioned, factor:

To up your own post count to lend your diatribes some sort of artificial legitimacy.

Hardly. The guy's ticked off, let it alone. Chirping the forums rules like children isn't helping the matter.

Also, nothing here is terrorist anything. I hope you were joking. everyone go back to playing Mario kart and drinking grape soda. This is stupid, and nap time is coming.

[Davetello]

You are predictable, and stupid. I'm on record as saying I hate post counts - I want them abolished. They're a load of bollox and they intimidate new members. I go weeks without logging on partly because I want to try and reign the count in - this wouldn't happen if I desired to up my post count. On every site I've been a part of I've been outspoken on wanting post counts abolished you dumb bitch.

You're a pseudo-intellectual pencil pusher in some backwater town. You're also another idiot jumping on this anti-Davetello bandwagon, because you flock of cowards like to gang up on people. There's plenty of legitimacy in what I say.

Stick to the misandry you bitter cow.

Oh, and the best poster on this site (imo), Refractive Reflections, told me by PM that your posts are full of fallacies, that you have an awful attitude and that I should just ignore your nonsense. Considering he's smarter than you, more educated than you, and doesn't come with the cvntish attitude, I think he has a good point.

I feel sorry for the poor cvnt you are dating. What sort of guy would date a man-hating weapon like you? Must be a beta male, because let's face it, there's no chance of you ever dating a dominant male. Needs to be some sap you can control. Cvnt.

Oh, and only idiots think that there's a correlation between post count and quality. You REALLY know nothing about me, do you? I'm the complete opposite of what you describe.

Will I prove it and implore the moderators to abolish the count? I want it to happen, imminently.

[Davetello]

Originally Posted by Commenter 42

Hardly. The guy's ticked off, let it alone. Chirping the forums rules like children isn't helping the matter.

Also, nothing here is terrorist anything. I hope you were joking. everyone go back to playing Mario kart and drinking grape soda. This is stupid, and nap time is coming.

How embarrassing was that terrorist comment? I actually think I'd kill myself if I ever resorted to something like that.

Look at the way these spineless cowards have ganged up on me - safety in numbers. They're a bunch of loser sewer rats who are needing brought down by several pegs. Referring to me as a bully while they all pile on. Absolute parasites.

[plastroncafe]

Considering all the negging, and the use of "beta male" as a pejorative, I just want to make this clear...so I'll be direct.
We're never going to date, so you can stop flirting.

[pennydreadful]

C'mon everyone - hug it out. The Annual Player Haters Ball isn't til next month!

[Davetello]

Yet again you ignore most of my post, and zone in on my attitude. That's your M.O.

An unoriginal, unfunny photo that's been doing the rounds for years. I'd say I'm surprised but I'm not.

As for me wishing to date you - don't flatter yourself you skank.

If karma existed you'd be joining Cure in the hospital.

Btw, I'm serious. Your partner must have zero self-respect to be with a man-despising lunatic like you. Perhaps you're just insanely good looking but I know from experience that misandrists don't tend to be beautiful.

[Lethal Lullaby]

I'm not sure if I've ever full out bashed a certain celebrity because I didn't like them. I mean there's some that I'm a little iffy about if I've heard bad things about them multiple times, but end up liking them in the end.

[plastroncafe]

More negging.
More PUA language.
More violent rhetoric every time I make it clear that you're not entitled to my time.

It's okay. It'll get better.

[Davetello]

You really are a delusional fvktard. And if you had any perceptiveness whatsoever you'd see that my PUA terminology has been a parody. I was laughing to myself last night while using terms like slayer and norwood cel.

Beta and alpha males is a different case and was a debate long before PUA came on to the scene.

And again, you have a woeful personality, are dismissive, argue via logical fallacies and are a selective quoter. I'm also betting you're not good looking, but even if you are, no woman could possibly be beautiful enough to compensate for a personality like yours.

Given all of the above, why would I ever be interested in you you utter, utter cvnt? You're no doubt frigid as fvck as well - don't want those horrible phallic monstrosities, those symbols of masculinity anywhere near your soaking, steaming, disgustingly stinking horrible Grand Canyon.

You're really pushing my boundaries now. Someone needs to kick your teeth in, female or not. You'd probably fight better than your ****ing cuckold 'man', though.

You weren't even that bothered when your own grandparent expired. I've never seen you display a sliver of empathy or compassion for another person. You're a sociopath.

[Cure]

Threats of violence, murder fantasies, calling people c*nts, bitches, skanks, and wishing death on people is a-ok. But the things I say are atrocities.

Alright, then.

[Candy Kappa]

Originally Posted by Commenter 42

Hardly. The guy's ticked off, let it alone.

Not the first time...

Originally Posted by Commenter 42

This is stupid, and nap time is coming.

Good, someone in the thread severely needs one.

[plastroncafe]

Originally Posted by Cure

Threats of violence, murder fantasies, calling people c*nts, bitches, skanks, and wishing death on people is a-ok. But the things I say are atrocities.

Alright, then.

You know, priorities.

[Davetello]

Originally Posted by Candy Kappa

Not the first time...

Yet Peanut does it all the fvcking time instigates a lot of it, and nobody says a fvcking word, Cure makes little personal attacks on a consistent basis and nobody says a word.

it's a witch-hunt, a fvcking witch-hunt. I'm far from an angel but scapegoated to fvckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.

Are people forgetting that this all began because of Peanut's cvntishness in the first place?