![]() |
|
|
#161 | |
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,904
|
Quote:
The short of it is that there is a fandom that wants to see Luke as a bad ass Jedi in his prime, outside of the whiny boy and the doddering old guy who does nothing in the new flicks. There wasn't any reason in the previous plan to give the O3 any more time in animation given the way Star Wars as an IP has unfolded. If Ruin Johnson didn't come on board and we had a bad ass Luke, Leia and Han movie recently, then you'd bet there'd be something in animation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#162 |
|
Overlord
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 43,899
|
None of that has to do with a series set during the OT trilogy era or directly after it. There's canon Star Wars comics since 2015 that feature Luke/Han/Leia in new stories and we'll never see those animated.
TLJ is 30 years in the future, it has nothing to do with the characters having stories in their prime. Likewise Luke's role on the island was already set up by Lucas and JJ, it has nothing to do with Rian. |
|
|
|
|
|
#163 | |
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,904
|
Quote:
And the Clone Wars was capitalizing on what was known to younger fans then - the prequel trilogy. And that's when Star Wars became a mover again in animation - with the Clone Wars. And with the recency of the prequel trilogy of course they were going to go with the clone wars. Audiences have recency bias and Hollywood capitalizes on it. And so to set an animated series either during the original trilogy or immediately after it using the O3, then the O3 would've needed star exposure from the new films, which they didn't get. They weren't even on screen together. That's how Hollywood works. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
Detoxed Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tokio, Italy
Posts: 11,229
|
i'm sure we'll see cartoons with the OT cast sooner rather than later, they obviously don't care about wacky stories with the cast if the canon Marvel comics have been any indication.
When will Disney dump SWs Detours comedy show? The show has a full season of finished episodes that Disney acquired from Lucas ready to release, can't do more damage than the sequel trilogy. Could even be good. That's the real question. |
|
|
|
|
|
#165 |
|
Ninjutsu Master
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 6,418
|
I suspect someday we'll get a story about Luke's life during his jedi temple period and we'll learn Mara Jade was a part of Luke's life, and fled with Luke's son from the temple as it was being destroyed. Maybe Luke thought she was dead all this time, or felt he had to distance himself from them the same as he was with everyone else. Anything can happen, Star Wars loves to pull this sort of thing
Skywalkers are only as done as Disney wants (or makes) them to be. Rey aside. Last edited by Zulithe; 11-28-2020 at 10:36 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#166 |
|
Mad Scientist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 2,255
|
Talking about Mara Jade, who I just met in the game Jedi Knight: Mysteries of the Sith, I wonder if we will ever see the reintroduction of Kyle Katarn in the canon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,593
|
Like Gina Carano, now the same SJWs are going after Rosario Dawson for "transphobic" stuff, trying to cancel her:
https://www.indiewire.com/2020/11/ro...it-1234601227/
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 | |
|
Annalist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,435
|
Quote:
__________________
ALL THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#169 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
Rosaria Dawson is an incredibly attractive woman who knows she's an incredibly attractive woman. She keeps herself fit and likes when people notice. She understands that many people who look at her are going to think about her in a sexual context, and is okay with that, and doesn't lean away from roles which sexualize her. She specifically did not wear a bra on purpose for a scene in "Clerks II" where she had to dance; this was not something she was asked to do, but something she chose to do, and explained it by saying, essentially, "That one's for the boys."
Basically, she's everything the Leftist Feminist Brigade hates. Her very existence reminds them of everything they aren't, and they feel bad about themselves when they see an attractive and intelligent woman who isn't afraid of being sexy. They're jealous, because they're overweight and unshaven and unfortunate-of-face or whatever else or any combination of those things, and so they see someone like her and cannot stand that she even exists. How dare she be attractive! How dare she be successful! Worst of all, how dare she be sexy! Doesn't she understand that women like her who embrace their attractiveness and sexuality make it HARDER for the couch potatoes with hairy armpits to hang onto their self-esteem? They know that if given the choice, any guy would always take someone like Her over someone like Them, and they find that "unfair". Therefore, she is The Enemy. And to "level the playing field", the "We have EVERY right to be fat and slovenly!" brigade has to find SOME thing to attack her for. They need her off the board. She wrecks the curve. I mean, in theory they COULD just fix themselves, because self-improvement is a virtue, but they don't see it that way. "We shouldn't HAVE to, dammit! People should just accept us the way we are, even if we're fat, or have mustaches, or runaway body hair that makes us smell like hamburger meat when it's hot out! We shouldn't have to be 'conventionally attractive', people should just accept that we're slobs and deal with that!" Yeah, well... they don't. Deal with THAT. I mean, you have to notice when the Feminazis go after someone, it's never someone who looks like Them. It's always someone hot. That's not by accident. It's just their way of lashing out at anyone who makes them feel "inferior". "You're better than me, and that hurts my feelings, because you're in a place I'll never be. And rather than get off my ass and try to improve myself, I'd just as soon see YOU not exist." And if there is no reason, they'll invent one. A girl I knew well went to UMass. Through her and her friends, I learned a LOT about "feminism". And there is NOTHING a "modern, liberated feminist" hates more than a hot chick who's successful. They can't stand them, and will do absolutely anything to get rid of them. If they had their way, Wonder Woman would be 300lbs with hairy pits. Any woman who takes care of herself and keeps fit may as well be committing a hate crime, the way they see it. There's no reasoning with those types of people. They're lunatics. This may come off as rather harsh, but only because it's 100% true. I've seen and heard way too much about how those people think, up close and personal. They have an agenda, and it involves wiping the Earth of good-looking people so they can sit around and stink without anyone judging them. By Any Means Necessary. It's gross. |
|
|
|
|
|
#170 | |||
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,904
|
Quote:
Quote:
And even when it isn't BS, it isn't general society's right or place to play judge jury and executioner. We do that with the ebb and flow of our dollars, not by sabotaging livelihoods. This has been bizarre for years, brother. Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
Haven't seen it, but I can buy it. She's definitely a good actress, I've been a fan of hers for a while and not just because she's hot. That definitely helps, but that's not all of it.
As to why The Left would suddenly try and attack her, though... that's what it comes down to. "She's hot, she wrecks the curve, thus she must be eliminated by any means necessary." People said it was weird that she'd be a target, I was merely explaining where it comes from, that's all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#172 |
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,904
|
Sin City.... yeesh! Great flick too....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,593
|
She was also the only good part in "Alexander."
You know which part...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,904
|
I haven't seen it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#175 |
|
Emperor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,904
|
Oh geeze, just by coincidence I ran into this on YouTube. Look at that... looks terrific as Luke!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#176 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
She was pretty good in "Death Proof", but good Lord, I am not into feet and Tarantino really needs to talk to someone about that stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#177 | |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,593
|
Quote:
I really dig Rosario, though. She has a certain disarming sensuality about her in just about every performance... yet can flip around and be a kind of scary rage monster, too. Also, a lot of actors and actresses, you can enjoy their performances but for many (and the "behind the scenes"/interview type stuff too) you just know that if you were ever in a room with them, you would be beneath them. I feel like the Rosario Dawson who shows up to shoot for Oliver Stone or Tarantino is probably the same Rosario Dawson who would, like, have a pizza with her buddies. Does anyone have any guesses as to who they'll cast as Grand Admiral Thrawn? Surely it'll be a Name, as they'll be having Gus from Breaking Bad taking orders from him. Once upon a time as a kid I figured that an icy cool (as in, not jokey Bond swagger mode) Roger Moore would have been picture perfect. But that was some time ago.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nWo Country
Posts: 27,703
|
I hope Kurt Russell got his shots after. That's all I'm sayin'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#179 |
|
Weed Whacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 34,593
|
I honestly had no idea she was in that 90s "KIDS" movie.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#180 |
|
Foot Elite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London, England
Posts: 4,087
|
Given they went with Katie Sackoff for Bo-Katan, they could quite easily have a look at Lars Mikkelson for Thrawn... face might not be angular enough though.
__________________
Lie with passion and be forever damned... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| cancelculture, gaydro pascal, star wars is dead |
|
|